IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v35y2019i3p358-373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Farmers’ preference for bundled input–output markets and implications for adapted dairy hubs in Tanzania—A choice experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Elizaphan J.O. Rao
  • N. Mtimet
  • E. Twine
  • I. Baltenweck
  • A. Omore

Abstract

Dairy business hubs (DBHs) are flexible mechanisms for linking farmers to input and output markets. Yet participation by smallholders in these hubs will only be realized if the hub options are adapted to the needs of farmers. We analyze preference for DBHs in Tanzania using survey data from smallholder dairy producers in Tanga and Morogoro. Applying choice experiment method, we find significant preference for hub options with higher milk prices and payment for milk on a fortnight rather than cash basis. Farmers also prefer options that bundle milk marketing with input provision. For bundled inputs, farmers prefer hub options that allow payment for such inputs via credit or check‐off rather than cash. Our analyses also reveal significant heterogeneity in preference among farmers that should be considered in adapting dairy hubs to Tanzania. Emerging dairy hubs in Tanzania should be supported to either establish in‐house input provision arrangements or to enter contracts with agro‐input dealers in their environs. [EconLit citations: C25, C99, Q13]

Suggested Citation

  • Elizaphan J.O. Rao & N. Mtimet & E. Twine & I. Baltenweck & A. Omore, 2019. "Farmers’ preference for bundled input–output markets and implications for adapted dairy hubs in Tanzania—A choice experiment," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(3), pages 358-373, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:35:y:2019:i:3:p:358-373
    DOI: 10.1002/agr.21565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21565
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/agr.21565?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kumar, Anjani & Shinoj, P. & Jee, Shiv, 2013. "Do Dairy Co-operatives Enhance Milk Production, Productivity and Quality? Evidences from the Indo-Gangetic Plain of India," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 68(3), pages 1-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Assan Ng’ombe & Mupangi Sithole & Collins Muimi Musafiri & Milka Kiboi & Tomas Sales & Felix Ngetich, 2023. "Building a Resilient and Sustainable Sorghum Value Chain in Tanzania’s Lake Zone Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Shyian, Natalia & Kolosha, Valerii, 2020. "Формування Ціни На Молоко В Україні В Контексті Світових Тенденцій," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 6(4), December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kumar, Anjani & Roy, Devesh & Joshi, Pramod K. & Tripathi, Gaurav & Adhikari, Rajendra P., 2016. "Impact of Contract Farming on Profits and Yield of Smallholder Farms in Nepal: An Evidence from Lentil Cultivation," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235848, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Anjani Kumar & Devesh Roy & Gaurav Tripathi, 2016. "Contracting by Small Farmers in Commodities with Export Potential: Assessing Farm Profits of Lentil Growers in Nepal," Working Papers id:10899, eSocialSciences.
    3. Dongol, P. & Thapa, G. & Kumar A., 2017. "Adoption of Milk Safety Measures and its Impact on Milk Acceptance by Buyers in Nepal," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 30(1), June.
    4. Gaillard, Cédric & Dervillé, Marie, 2022. "Dairy farming, cooperatives and livelihoods: lessons learned from six indian villages," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    5. Kumar, Anjani & Saroj, Sunil & Joshi, P.K. & Takeshima, Hiroyuki, 2018. "Does cooperative membership improve household welfare? Evidence from a panel data analysis of smallholder dairy farmers in Bihar, India," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 24-36.
    6. Guoqiang Liu & Dakuan Qiao & Yuying Liu & Xinhong Fu, 2022. "Does Service Utilization Improve Members’ Welfare? Evidence from Citrus Cooperatives in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Bayan, B, 2018. "EU-Brazil proposal on farm support: strengthening agricultural reforms or undermining them?," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 31(1).
    8. Kumar, Anjani & Roy, Devesh & Trapathi, Gaurav & Joshi, Pramod Kumar & Adhikari, Rajendra Prasad, 2016. "Can contract farming increase farmers’ income and enhance adoption of food safety practices?: Evidence from remote areas of Nepal:," IFPRI discussion papers 1524, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Cédric Gaillard & Marie Dervillé, 2022. "Dairy farming, cooperatives and livelihoods: lessons learned from six indian villages," Post-Print hal-03483394, HAL.
    10. Tripathi, G. & Kumar, A. & Roy, D. & Joshi, P., 2018. "Profits from participation in contract farming: Evidence from cultivators of onion, okra and pomegranate in Maharashtra, India," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277106, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:35:y:2019:i:3:p:358-373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.