IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wfo/monber/y2014i3p183-195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Das Gender-Budget-Ziel in der aktiven Arbeitsmarktpolitik: Mindestens 50% der Mittel für Frauen

Author

Listed:
  • Hedwig Lutz

    (WIFO)

Abstract

Seit mehreren Jahren fordert der österreichische Bundesminister für Arbeit, mindestens 50% des Budgets der aktiven Arbeitsmarktpolitik für Frauen zu verwenden. Dieses Ziel wurde österreichweit seit 2004 nur zwischen 2005 und 2007 erreicht, obwohl Frauen häufiger Zugang zu einer Maßnahme finden als Männer. Die Förderung für Frauen ist aber im Durchschnitt niedriger. Um den Anteil der Frauen am Fördervolumen auf 50% zu steigern, muss vom Arbeitsmarktservice strukturell geringeren Förderkosten gegengesteuert werden, was in den einzelnen Landesgeschäftsstellen mit unterschiedlichen Strategien erfolgt. Bedeutsam dafür sind in jedem Fall die Frauenförderprogramme (Wiedereinstieg, Handwerk und Technik). Diese Programme werden durch die Ministervorgabe auch finanziell abgesichert.

Suggested Citation

  • Hedwig Lutz, 2014. "Das Gender-Budget-Ziel in der aktiven Arbeitsmarktpolitik: Mindestens 50% der Mittel für Frauen," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 87(3), pages 183-195, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2014:i:3:p:183-195
    Note: With English abstract.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/47171
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: Payment required
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margit Schratzenstaller-Altzinger, 2012. "Gender-Budgeting im Steuersystem," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 45759, March.
    2. Ben Jann, 2008. "A Stata implementation of the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition," ETH Zurich Sociology Working Papers 5, ETH Zurich, Chair of Sociology, revised 14 May 2008.
    3. Julia Bock-Schappelwein & Helmut Mahringer & Eva Rückert, 2011. "Kurzarbeit in Deutschland und Österreich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 41278, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hedwig Lutz & Margit Schratzenstaller-Altzinger & Andrea Leitner & Andrea Laimer, 2013. "50% des Budgets der aktiven Arbeitsmarktpolitik für Frauen. Implementierung, Umsetzung und Wirkung des Genderbudgetziels," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 46953, March.
    2. Michael E. Martell & Peyton Nash, 2020. "For Love and Money? Earnings and Marriage Among Same-Sex Couples," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 260-294, September.
    3. Button, Patrick & Walker, Brigham, 2020. "Employment discrimination against Indigenous Peoples in the United States: Evidence from a field experiment," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    4. Jakub Picka, 2014. "Problém "public-private pay gap" v České republice [The Public-Private Pay Gap in the Czech Republic]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(5), pages 662-682.
    5. Werner Hölzl & Michael Böheim & Klaus Friesenbichler & Agnes Kügler & Thomas Leoni, 2021. "Staatliche Hilfsmaßnahmen für Unternehmen in der COVID-19-Krise. Eine begleitende Analyse operativer Aspekte und Unternehmenseinschätzungen," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 66624, March.
    6. Michel Lubrano & Abdoul Aziz Junior Ndoye, 2014. "Bayesian Unconditional Quantile Regression: An Analysis of Recent Expansions in Wage Structure and Earnings Inequality in the US 1992–2009," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 61(2), pages 129-153, May.
    7. Jessen, Jonas & Schmitz, Sophia & Waights, Sevrin, 2020. "Understanding day care enrolment gaps," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    8. Niels-Hugo Blunch & Maitreyi Bordia Das, 2015. "Changing norms about gender inequality in education: Evidence from Bangladesh," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 32(6), pages 183-218.
    9. Riccardo Leoncini & Mariele Macaluso & Annalivia Polselli, 2024. "Gender segregation: analysis across sectoral dominance in the UK labour market," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 67(5), pages 2289-2343, November.
    10. JongSoo Lee & Bit Na Choi, 2023. "A Study on Regional Return to Education in South Korea: Comparison of Male and Female Wages," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 202311, University of Kansas, Department of Economics.
    11. Kamila Kolpashnikova & Man-Yee Kan, 2020. "The gender gap in the United States: Housework across racialized groups," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(36), pages 1067-1080.
    12. Liliane Bonnal & Rachid Boumahdi & Pascal Favard, 2013. "The easiest way to estimate the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 96-101, January.
    13. Demombynes, Gabriel & Trommlerova, Sofia Karina, 2012. "What has driven the decline of infant mortality in Kenya ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6057, The World Bank.
    14. Philipp Heimberger, 2017. "Österreichs Staatsausgabenstrukturen im europäischen Vergleich," wiiw Research Reports in German language 8, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    15. Shiba Shankar Pattayat & Jajati Keshari Parida & Kirtti Ranjan Paltasingh, 2023. "Gender Wage Gap among Rural Non-farm Sector Employees in India: Evidence from Nationally Representative Survey," Review of Development and Change, , vol. 28(1), pages 22-44, June.
    16. Michael Martell, 2013. "Do ENDAs End Discrimination for Behaviorally Gay Men?," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 147-169, June.
    17. Eichhorst, Werner & Weishaupt, J. Timo, 2013. "Mit Neo-Korporatismus durch die Krise? Die Rolle des Sozialen Dialogs in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz," IZA Discussion Papers 7498, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Peng Bin & Andrea Fracasso, 2017. "Regional Consumption Inequality in China: An Oaxaca-Blinder Decomposition at the Prefectural Level," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 459-486, September.
    19. Foster, E. Michael & Hillemeier, Marianne M. & Bai, Yu, 2011. "Explaining the disparity in placement instability among African-American and white children in child welfare: A Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 118-125, January.
    20. Mauricio Quinones Domínguez & Juan Antonio Rodríguez Sinisterra, 2011. "Rendimiento de la educación en las regiones colombianas: un análisis usando la Descomposición Oaxaca-Blinder," Revista Sociedad y Economía, Universidad del Valle, CIDSE, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2014:i:3:p:183-195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.