IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wea/worler/v2015y2015i5p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Universal Basic Income and the Cost Objection: What are we Waiting For?

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Pereira

    (University of Birmingham, UK)

Abstract

Among the most common objections to providing everyone with an unconditional basic income is the cost objection. It states that the cost of providing everyone with a decent income floor, beneath which no one would fall, is out of reach for governments and public finance. Income taxes would have to be raised to unacceptable levels to accomplish this, the objection claims. This paper addresses the objection by demonstrating its weaknesses and showing that a universal basic income is affordable. It is in fact more affordable than the current wasteful array of often counter-productive, bureaucratic income security programs. Better results can be achieved with lower costs by implementing basic income, or a guaranteed livable income. This study does not seek any cuts to vital public programs such as universal health care or education to attain the result of a basic income sufficient to cover one's needs for food, modest shelter etc. at all times. Personal income taxes are not raised in this proposal and they could even be cut, while improving health outcomes for individuals and reducing health burdens upon the current system resulting from a presently dysfunctional, outdated income security model.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Pereira, 2015. "Universal Basic Income and the Cost Objection: What are we Waiting For?," World Economic Review, World Economics Association, vol. 2015(5), pages 1-1, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wea:worler:v:2015:y:2015:i:5:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wer.worldeconomicsassociation.org/papers/universal-basic-income-and-the-cost-objection-what-are-we-waiting-for/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://wer.worldeconomicsassociation.org/files/WEA-WER-5-Periera.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karl Widerquist, 2006. "Who Exploits Who?," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 54(3), pages 444-464, October.
    2. Karl Widerquist, 2006. "Who Exploits Who?1," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 54(3), pages 444-464, October.
    3. Guy Standing, 2009. "Work after Globalization," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13314.
    4. Stuart White, 1997. "Liberal Equality, Exploitation, and the Case for an Unconditional Basic Income," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 45(2), pages 312-326, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Smith-Carrier Tracy A & Green Steven, 2017. "Another Low Road to Basic Income? Mapping a Pragmatic Model for Adopting a Basic Income in Canada," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Major Aaron, 2016. "Affording Utopia: The Economic Viability of “A Capitalist Road to Communism”," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 75-95, December.
    3. Kim, Steven, 2016. "Complex Factors Behind Misguided Policies in Socioeconomics: From Mass Migration and Persistent Alienation to Rampant Crime and Economic Malaise," MPRA Paper 76733, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew Lister, 2020. "Reconsidering the reciprocity objection to unconditional basic income," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 19(3), pages 209-228, August.
    2. Karl Widerquist, 2006. "Who Exploits Who?," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 54(3), pages 444-464, October.
    3. Joshua Greenstein, 2020. "The Precariat Class Structure and Income Inequality among US Workers: 1980–2018," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 52(3), pages 447-469, September.
    4. Amrita Chhachhi & Saumyajit Bhattacharya, 2014. "Is Labour Still a Relevant Category for Praxis? Critical Reflections on Some Contemporary Discourses on Work and Labour in Capitalism," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(5), pages 941-962, September.
    5. James Copestake, 2010. "The global financial crisis of 2008-2009: an opportunity for development studies?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(6), pages 699-713.
    6. Gasper, D.R. & George, S., 2010. "Cultivating humanity?," ISS Working Papers - General Series 19777, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    7. Andrew Lister, 2017. "Markets, desert, and reciprocity," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 16(1), pages 47-69, February.
    8. Edward A. Page, 2007. "Fairness on the Day after Tomorrow: Justice, Reciprocity and Global Climate Change," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(1), pages 225-242, March.
    9. Deakin, S. F., 2013. "Addressing labour market segmentation : the role of labour law," ILO Working Papers 994834483402676, International Labour Organization.
    10. Artner, Annamária, 2013. "A fiatalok munkanélküliségének kérdéséhez Európa példáján keresztül [Contribution to the problem of the youth unemployment through the example of Europe]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(12), pages 1370-1392.
    11. Karl Widerquist, 1999. "Reciprocity and the Guaranteed Income," Politics & Society, , vol. 27(3), pages 387-402, September.
    12. Amrita Chhachhi & Amrita Chhachhi, 2014. "Introduction: The ‘Labour Question’ in Contemporary Capitalism," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(5), pages 895-919, September.
    13. repec:ilo:ilowps:483448 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Davey, Ryan, 2019. "Financialised welfare and its vulnerabilities: advice, consumer credit, and church-based charity in the UK," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102287, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Standing Guy, 2012. "Why a Basic Income Is Necessary for a Right to Work," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 19-40, January.
    16. Abdul Aziz, 2021. "Globalization, Class, and Immigration: An Intersectional Analysis of the New East End," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    17. Martínez Virto, Lucía & Sánchez Salmerón, Victor, 2019. "Regional inclusion policies in Spain: new approaches and keys to their effectiveness," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 44, pages 17-28.
    18. Kirsten Sehnbruch & Brendan Burchell & Nurjk Agloni & Agnieszka Piasna, 2015. "Human Development and Decent Work: Why some Concepts Succeed and Others Fail to Make an Impact," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 46(2), pages 197-224, March.
    19. -, 2014. "Estudio Económico de América Latina y el Caribe 2014: desafíos para la sostenibilidad del crecimiento en un nuevo contexto externo," Estudio Económico de América Latina y el Caribe, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 36970 edited by Cepal, May.
    20. Jiaqi Yang & Geetha Mohan & Supriya Pipil & Kensuke Fukushi, 2021. "Review on basic income (BI): its theories and empirical cases," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 23(2), pages 203-239, December.
    21. Chakraborty, M., 2013. "Male, migrant, muslim : Identities and entitlements of Afghans and Bengalis in a South Delhi neighbourhood," ISS Working Papers - General Series 552, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wea:worler:v:2015:y:2015:i:5:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jake McMurchie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/worecea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.