IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/suvges/v34y2024i4p34-57n1002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Organizational Inefficiency Adversely Affects Number-of-Employee Based Production Outputs

Author

Listed:
  • Forrest Jeffrey Yi-Lin

    (Department of Accounting Economics Finance, Slippery Rock University, Slippery Rock, USA)

  • Kara Orhan

    (Department of Economics and Finance, West Chester University, West Chester, USA)

  • Augustin Lua A.

    (Department of Accounting Economics Finance, Slippery Rock University, Slippery Rock, USA)

  • Uzuner Gizem

    (Department of Industrial Management, School of Management, New Uzbekistan University, Uzbekistan & Department of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Economics Administrative and Social Sciences, Istanbul Gelisim University, Istanbul, Turkey)

  • Liu Jun

    (School of Digital Economics and Management, Wuxi University, Wuxi, China)

Abstract

This study uses an analytical approach to investigate the emerging disconnect between firm size and financial performance, as observed recently from a set of long-term data collected from U.S. public firms. By holding all organizational aspects of a firm constant, it confirms the validity of the old saying that the larger a firm is, the better chance it can secure advantages against rivals and the higher returns it can fetch. However, if the assumption about organizational aspects is removed, the present study shows that if a firm employs its assets to increase production output through hiring additional employees, then the consequently increased organizational inefficiency, as caused by interactions of the employees, will soon erase the expected increase in the output. Additionally, it is also shown, among other results, that when a firm hires additional human labor to meet the increasing market demand, the expected profit will decline after first reaching its maximum level. These results crystalize what has been speculated and what have been empirically observed. In the conclusion section, it is recommended that increasing a firm’s size, in terms of the number of employees, is not a realistic, efficient solution to meeting the challenge of increasing market demand. Instead, any genuine solution must satisfy the condition that it does not increase the organization’s inefficiency of the firm, such as increasing the magnitude of automation and/or digitization.

Suggested Citation

  • Forrest Jeffrey Yi-Lin & Kara Orhan & Augustin Lua A. & Uzuner Gizem & Liu Jun, 2024. "How Organizational Inefficiency Adversely Affects Number-of-Employee Based Production Outputs," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 34(4), pages 34-57.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:suvges:v:34:y:2024:i:4:p:34-57:n:1002
    DOI: 10.2478/sues-2024-0017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/sues-2024-0017
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/sues-2024-0017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Diaz & Rosario Sanchez, 2008. "Firm size and productivity in Spain: a stochastic frontier analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 315-323, March.
    2. Liu, Jun & Chang, Huihong & Forrest, Jeffrey Yi-Lin & Yang, Baohua, 2020. "Influence of artificial intelligence on technological innovation: Evidence from the panel data of china's manufacturing sectors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    3. Goddard, John & Tavakoli, Manouche & Wilson, John O.S., 2009. "Sources of variation in firm profitability and growth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(4), pages 495-508, April.
    4. Emanuela Delbufalo, 2018. "Agency Theory and Sustainability in Global Supply Chain," SpringerBriefs in Business, in: Agency Theory and Sustainability in the Global Supply Chain, chapter 0, pages 33-54, Springer.
    5. Paul S. Adler, 2012. "PERSPECTIVE—The Sociological Ambivalence of Bureaucracy: From Weber via Gouldner to Marx," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 244-266, February.
    6. Sandler, Todd & Tschirhart, John, 1997. "Club Theory: Thirty Years Later," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 93(3-4), pages 335-355, December.
    7. Richard P. Rumelt, 1991. "How much does industry matter?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 167-185, March.
    8. Hanousek, Jan & Kočenda, Evžen & Shamshur, Anastasiya, 2015. "Corporate efficiency in Europe," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 24-40.
    9. Justin Tan & Mike W. Peng, 2003. "Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: two studies from an emerging economy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(13), pages 1249-1263, December.
    10. Senthil Kumar Muthusamy & Ramadevi Kannan, 2023. "Profits crisis: evolving patterns of firm size and performance in traditional U.S. industries," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 50(3), pages 575-603, September.
    11. William Greene & Dan Segal, 2004. "Profitability and Efficiency in the U.S. Life Insurance Industry," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 229-247, May.
    12. Emanuela Delbufalo, 2018. "Agency Theory and Sustainability in the Global Supply Chain," SpringerBriefs in Business, Springer, number 978-3-319-72793-6, January.
    13. Riordan, Michael H. & Williamson, Oliver E., 1985. "Asset specificity and economic organization," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 365-378, December.
    14. Jan K. Brueckner & Kangoh Lee, 1991. "Economies of Scope and Multiproduct Clubs," Public Finance Review, , vol. 19(2), pages 193-208, April.
    15. Sara Schumacher & Michael Boland, 2005. "The effects of industry and firm resources on profitability in the food economy," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(1), pages 97-108.
    16. Fabio Pieri & Riccardo Verruso, 2019. "The determinants of corporate profitability in the Italian domestic appliances industry," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 46(1), pages 83-115, March.
    17. Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel & Brooks, Dan & Mulloy, Martin, 2015. "Inside the Ford-UAW Transformation: Pivotal Events in Valuing Work and Delivering Results," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262029162, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Senthil Kumar Muthusamy & Ramadevi Kannan, 2023. "Profits crisis: evolving patterns of firm size and performance in traditional U.S. industries," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 50(3), pages 575-603, September.
    2. Stefan Hirsch & Jan Schiefer, 2016. "What Causes Firm Profitability Variation in the EU Food Industry? A Redux of Classical Approaches of Variance Decomposition," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 79-92, January.
    3. Jan Schiefer & Stefan Hirsch & Monika Hartmann & Adelina Gschwandtner, 2013. "Industry, firm, year and country effects on profitability in EU food processing," Studies in Economics 1309, School of Economics, University of Kent.
    4. Zouaghi, Ferdaous & Hirsch, Stefan & Garcia, Mercedes Sanchez, 2016. "What Drives Firm Profitability? A Multilevel Approach To The Spanish Agri-Food Sector," 56th Annual Conference, Bonn, Germany, September 28-30, 2016 244762, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    5. Schiefer, Jan & Hartmann, Monika, 2013. "Industry, firm, year, and country effects on profitability in EU food processing," Discussion Papers 162878, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
    6. Changhyun Kim & Richard A. Bettis, 2014. "Cash is surprisingly valuable as a strategic asset," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(13), pages 2053-2063, December.
    7. Schiefer, Jan & Hartmann, Monika, 2009. "Industry, firm, year, and country effects on profitability: Evidence from a large sample of EU food processing firms," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49322, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. John Geary & Andrea Signoretti, 2022. "The role of socio-economic embeddedness in promoting cooperation in the workplace: Evidence from family-owned Italian firms," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(4), pages 1867-1890, November.
    9. Michael Rosko & Mona Al-Amin & Manouchehr Tavakoli, 2020. "Efficiency and profitability in US not-for-profit hospitals," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 359-379, December.
    10. Somohano Rodríguez, Francisco M. & López Fernández, José Manuel & Martínez García, Francisco Javier, 2018. "El efecto de la innovación en el resultado empresarial durante la recesión económica. Una aplicación a la industria de la automoción," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 91-105.
    11. Deniz Köksal & Jochen Strähle, 2021. "Social Sustainability in Fashion Supply Chains—Understanding Social Standard Implementation Failures in Vietnam and Indonesia Using Agency Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-36, February.
    12. Baumöhl, Eduard & Iwasaki, Ichiro & Kočenda, Evžen, 2019. "Institutions and determinants of firm survival in European emerging markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 431-453.
    13. Boland, Michael A. & Pendell, Dustin L., 2005. "Persistence of Profitability in Family-Owned Food Businesses," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19216, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Carlo MIGLIARDO & Daniele SCHILIRÒ, 2016. "Mid Sized Italian Manufacturing Firms A Panel Data Analysis on Profitability," Journal of Advanced Studies in Finance, ASERS Publishing, vol. 7(2), pages 129-145.
    15. Philipp Steinbrunner, 2024. "Are governments bad entrepreneurs? On productivity and public ownership in Central European post‐Communist countries," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 33-66, March.
    16. Kohls, Tobias & Mager, Ferdinand & Regele, Tobias, 2023. "Competitive advantage and firm, industry, and country effects: An asset pricing perspective," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    17. Yung Yau & Huiying (Cynthia) Hou & Ka Chi Yip & Queena Kun Qian, 2021. "Transaction Cost and Agency Perspectives on Eco-Certification of Existing Buildings: A Study of Hong Kong," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
    18. Meltem Kılıç & Hasan Emin Gurler & Ahmet Kaya & Chang Won Lee, 2022. "The Impact of Sustainability Performance on Financial Performance: Does Firm Size Matter? Evidence from Turkey and South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    19. Mercè Sala‐Ríos, 2024. "What are the determinants affecting cooperatives’ profitability? Evidence from Spain," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 85-111, March.
    20. Todd Sandler, 2024. "Tiebout jurisdictions and clubs," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 73(3), pages 857-872, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    asset size; capital market; firm size; mission; personnel; scale economy; values and beliefs;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:suvges:v:34:y:2024:i:4:p:34-57:n:1002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.