IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/quageo/v41y2022i3p169-181n11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geotourism Potential of Show Caves in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Zieliński Artur

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Poland)

  • Marek Aneta

    (Department of Geography and Regional Development, University of Wrocław, Poland)

  • Zwoliński Zbigniew

    (Institute of Geoecology and Geoinformation, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

In the modern world, tourism is a very dynamically growing industry with significant impact on the economic prosperity of many regions or even countries. The paper presents the geotourism potential of the 12 show (commercial) caves in Poland before and during the current pandemic time. Survey results demonstrate that caves are major geotourist attractions. In 2019, they were visited by a total of almost 950,000 people. The attendance might have exceeded even a million if the popular Mroźna Cave in the Tatras had not been temporarily closed to visitors due to a rockfall in winter period 2018/2019. In 2020, all the show caves combined were visited by a more than 390,000 people, which amounted to about 41% of the total attendance recorded for 2019. The most visited cave proved to be Smocza Jama (Dragon's Den) in the centre of Kraków, which recorded almost 422,000 visitors in 2019. A preliminary assessment of the attractiveness of the caves as geosites is given. The most attractive caves as geosites were identified as: Bear Cave, Upper Wierzchowska Cave, and Bat Cave. It is possible to confidently assert that the celebration of the International Year of Caves and Karst (IYCK) in 2021–2022 will increase interest in caves and translate into a revival of cave tourism.

Suggested Citation

  • Zieliński Artur & Marek Aneta & Zwoliński Zbigniew, 2022. "Geotourism Potential of Show Caves in Poland," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 41(3), pages 169-181, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:quageo:v:41:y:2022:i:3:p:169-181:n:11
    DOI: 10.14746/quageo-2022-0032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2022-0032
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14746/quageo-2022-0032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stanislava Pachrová & Petr Chalupa & Eva Janoušková & Alice Šedivá Neckáøová & Leoš Štefka, 2020. "Monitoring of Visitors as a Tool of Protected Areas Management," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 13(1), pages 67-79.
    2. Vladimír Čech & Peter Chrastina & Bohuslava Gregorová & Pavel Hronček & Radoslav Klamár & Vladislava Košová, 2021. "Analysis of Attendance and Speleotourism Potential of Accessible Caves in Karst Landscape of Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Stanislava Pachrová & Petr Chalupa & Eva Janoušková & Alice Šedivá Neckáøová & Leoš Štefka, 2020. "Monitoring of Visitors as a Tool of Protected Areas Management," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 13(1), pages 67-79.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomi Špindler & Miha Lesjak & Mitja Gorenak, 2022. "Changing Values Through Generations: The Case of Mountain Tourists," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 15(1), pages 95-109.
    2. Tamás Telbisz & Zoltán Imecs & András Máthé & László Mari, 2023. "Empirical Investigation of the Motivation and Perception of Tourists Visiting the Apuseni Nature Park (Romania) and the Relationship of Tourism and Natural Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:quageo:v:41:y:2022:i:3:p:169-181:n:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.