IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/quageo/v37y2018i3p177-190n12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geo-Questionnaire: A Spatially Explicit Method for Eliciting Public Preferences, Behavioural Patterns, and Local Knowledge – An Overview

Author

Listed:
  • Czepkiewicz Michał

    (Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland)

  • Jankowski Piotr

    (Department of Geography, San Diego State University, San Diego, USA)

  • Zwoliński Zbigniew

    (Institute of Geoecology and Geoinformation, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

Geo-questionnaires have been used in a variety of domains to collect public preferences, behavioural patterns, and spatially-explicit local knowledge, for academic research and environmental and urban planning. This paper provides an overview of the method focusing on the methodical characteristics of geo-questionnaires including software functions, types of collected data, and techniques of data analysis. The paper also discusses broader methodical issues related to the practice of deploying geo-questionnaires such as respondent selection and recruitment, representativeness, and data quality. The discussion of methodical issues is followed by an overview of the recent examples of geo-questionnaire applications in Poland, and the discussion of socio-technical aspects of geo-questionnaire use in spatial planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Czepkiewicz Michał & Jankowski Piotr & Zwoliński Zbigniew, 2018. "Geo-Questionnaire: A Spatially Explicit Method for Eliciting Public Preferences, Behavioural Patterns, and Local Knowledge – An Overview," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 37(3), pages 177-190, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:quageo:v:37:y:2018:i:3:p:177-190:n:12
    DOI: 10.2478/quageo-2018-0033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0033
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/quageo-2018-0033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Perchoux, Camille & Kestens, Yan & Thomas, Frédérique & Hulst, Andraea Van & Thierry, Benoit & Chaix, Basile, 2014. "Assessing patterns of spatial behavior in health studies: Their socio-demographic determinants and associations with transportation modes (the RECORD Cohort Study)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 64-73.
    2. Gregory Brown & Maggi Kelly & Debra Whitall, 2014. "Which 'public'? Sampling effects in public participation GIS (PPGIS) and volunteered geographic information (VGI) systems for public lands management," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(2), pages 190-214, February.
    3. Gregory Brown & Pat Reed, 2012. "Social Landscape Metrics: Measures for Understanding Place Values from Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS)," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 73-90.
    4. Suzana Dragićević & Shivanand Balram, 2004. "A Web GIS collaborative framework to structure and manage distributed planning processes," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 133-153, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lo, A. W.-T. & Houston, D., 2018. "How do compact, accessible, and walkable communities promote gender equality in spatial behavior?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 42-54.
    2. Isabelle King & John Martin, 2021. "Exploring Public Recognition and Perceived Cultural Value of the Special Qualities within English Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Kamyar Hasanzadeh & Tiina Laatikainen & Marketta Kyttä, 2018. "A place-based model of local activity spaces: individual place exposure and characteristics," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 227-252, July.
    4. Amalia Vaneska Palacio Buendía & Yolanda Pérez-Albert & David Serrano Giné, 2021. "Mapping Landscape Perception: An Assessment with Public Participation Geographic Information Systems and Spatial Analysis Techniques," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Feuillet, Thierry & Bulteau, Julie & Dantan, Sophie, 2021. "Modelling context-specific relationships between neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and private car use," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Fillekes, Michelle Pasquale & Röcke, Christina & Katana, Marko & Weibel, Robert, 2019. "Self-reported versus GPS-derived indicators of daily mobility in a sample of healthy older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 193-202.
    7. Schröter, Matthias & Kraemer, Roland & Mantel, Martin & Kabisch, Nadja & Hecker, Susanne & Richter, Anett & Neumeier, Veronika & Bonn, Aletta, 2017. "Citizen science for assessing ecosystem services: Status, challenges and opportunities," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 80-94.
    8. Isabelle Soares & Gerd Weitkamp & Claudia Yamu, 2020. "Public Spaces as Knowledgescapes: Understanding the Relationship between the Built Environment and Creative Encounters at Dutch University Campuses and Science Parks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-30, October.
    9. Rico H Herzog & Juliana E Gonçalves & Geertje Slingerland & Reinout Kleinhans & Holger Prang & Frances Brazier & Trivik Verma, 2024. "Cities for citizens! Public value spheres for understanding conflicts in urban planning," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(7), pages 1327-1344, May.
    10. Dharmowijoyo, Dimas B.E. & Susilo, Yusak O. & Karlström, Anders & Adiredja, Lili Somantri, 2015. "Collecting a multi-dimensional three-weeks household time-use and activity diary in the Bandung Metropolitan Area, Indonesia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 231-246.
    11. Timothée Cuignet & Camille Perchoux & Geoffrey Caruso & Olivier Klein & Sylvain Klein & Basile Chaix & Yan Kestens & Philippe Gerber, 2020. "Mobility among older adults: Deconstructing the effects of motility and movement on wellbeing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 383-401, February.
    12. Linjun Yu & Xiaotong Zhang & Feng He & Xiaojun Wang, 2022. "Participatory Historical Village Landscape Analysis Using a Virtual Globe-Based 3D PGIS: Guizhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Matthew R. Sloggy & Francisco J. Escobedo & José J. Sánchez, 2022. "The Role of Spatial Information in Peri-Urban Ecosystem Service Valuation and Policy Investment Preferences," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    14. Anne Marel Hilbers & Frans J. Sijtsma & Tim Busscher & Jos Arts, 2022. "Identifying Citizens' Place Values for Integrated Planning of Road Infrastructure Projects," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(1), pages 35-56, February.
    15. Federica Gobattoni & Raffaele Pelorosso & Maria Nicolina Ripa & Antonio Leone, 2015. "Percezione e identit? paesaggistica: un?opportunit? di sviluppo per i territori rurali," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(3), pages 49-70.
    16. Roberts, Hannah & van Lissa, Caspar & Helbich, Marco, 2021. "Perceived neighbourhood characteristics and depressive symptoms: Potential mediators and the moderating role of employment status," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    17. Samira Ramezani & Tiina Laatikainen & Kamyar Hasanzadeh & Marketta Kyttä, 2021. "Shopping trip mode choice of older adults: an application of activity space and hybrid choice models in understanding the effects of built environment and personal goals," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 505-536, April.
    18. Kirsten McEwan & Miles Richardson & David Sheffield & Fiona J. Ferguson & Paul Brindley, 2019. "A Smartphone App for Improving Mental Health through Connecting with Urban Nature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.
    19. Margaux Sanchez & Albert Ambros & Maëlle Salmon & Santhi Bhogadi & Robin T. Wilson & Sanjay Kinra & Julian D. Marshall & Cathryn Tonne, 2017. "Predictors of Daily Mobility of Adults in Peri-Urban South India," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, July.
    20. Czembrowski, Piotr & Kronenberg, Jakub & Czepkiewicz, Michał, 2016. "Integrating non-monetary and monetary valuation methods – SoftGIS and hedonic pricing," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 166-175.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:quageo:v:37:y:2018:i:3:p:177-190:n:12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.