IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v220y2019icp193-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-reported versus GPS-derived indicators of daily mobility in a sample of healthy older adults

Author

Listed:
  • Fillekes, Michelle Pasquale
  • Röcke, Christina
  • Katana, Marko
  • Weibel, Robert

Abstract

In light of novel opportunities to use sensor data to observe individuals' day-to-day mobility in the context of healthy aging research, it is important to understand how meaningful mobility indicators can be extracted from such data and to which degree these sensor-derived indicators are comparable to corresponding self-reports. We used sensor (GPS and accelerometer) and self-reported data from 27 healthy older adults (≥67 years) who participated in the MOASIS project over a 30-day period. Based on sensor data we computed three commonly used daily mobility indicators: life space (LS), travel duration using passive (i.e., motorized) modes of transportation (pMOT) and travel duration using active (i.e., non-motorized) modes of transportation (aMOT). We assessed the degree to which these sensor-derived indicators compare to corresponding self-reports at a within-person level, computing intraindividual correlations (iCorrs), subsequently assessing whether iCorrs can be associated with participants’ socio-demographic characteristics on a between-person level. Moderate to large positive mean iCorrs between the respective self-reported and sensor-derived indicators were found (r = 0.75 for LS, 0.51 for pMOT and 0.36 for aMOT). In comparison to sensor-derived indicators, self-reported LS slightly underestimates, while self-reported aMOT as well as pMOT considerably overestimate the amount of daily mobility. Participants with access to a car have higher probabilities of agreement in the pMOT indicator. Sensor-based assessments are promising as they are “objective”, involve less participant burden and observations can be extended over long periods. The findings of this paper help researchers on mobility and aging to estimate the magnitude and direction of potential differences in the assessed variable due to the assessment methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Fillekes, Michelle Pasquale & Röcke, Christina & Katana, Marko & Weibel, Robert, 2019. "Self-reported versus GPS-derived indicators of daily mobility in a sample of healthy older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 193-202.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:220:y:2019:i:c:p:193-202
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953618306440
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brusilovskiy, Eugene & Klein, Louis A. & Salzer, Mark S., 2016. "Using global positioning systems to study health-related mobility and participation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 134-142.
    2. Amit Birenboim & Noam Shoval, 2016. "Mobility Research in the Age of the Smartphone," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 106(2), pages 283-291, March.
    3. Perchoux, Camille & Kestens, Yan & Thomas, Frédérique & Hulst, Andraea Van & Thierry, Benoit & Chaix, Basile, 2014. "Assessing patterns of spatial behavior in health studies: Their socio-demographic determinants and associations with transportation modes (the RECORD Cohort Study)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 64-73.
    4. Meijering, Louise & Weitkamp, Gerd, 2016. "Numbers and narratives: Developing a mixed-methods approach to understand mobility in later life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 200-206.
    5. Michal Isaacson & Noam Shoval & Hans-Werner Wahl & Frank Oswald & Gail Auslander, 2016. "Compliance and data quality in GPS-based studies," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 25-36, January.
    6. Franke, Thea & Winters, Meghan & McKay, Heather & Chaudhury, Habib & Sims-Gould, Joanie, 2017. "A grounded visualization approach to explore sociospatial and temporal complexities of older adults' mobility," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 59-69.
    7. Michal Isaacson & Noam Shoval & Hans-Werner Wahl & Frank Oswald & Gail Auslander, 2016. "Compliance and data quality in GPS-based studies," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 25-36, January.
    8. Eleftheria Giannouli & Otmar Bock & Wiebren Zijlstra, 2018. "Cognitive functioning is more closely related to real-life mobility than to laboratory-based mobility parameters," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 57-65, March.
    9. Paul Kelly & Patricia Krenn & Sylvia Titze & Peter Stopher & Charlie Foster, 2013. "Quantifying the Difference Between Self-Reported and Global Positioning Systems-Measured Journey Durations: A Systematic Review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(4), pages 443-459, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pantelaki, Evangelia & Maggi, Elena & Crotti, Daniele, 2021. "Mobility impact and well-being in later life: A multidisciplinary systematic review," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    2. Brusilovskiy, Eugene & Klein, Louis A. & Townley, Greg & Snethen, Gretchen & McCormick, Bryan & Hiremath, Shivayogi V. & Salzer, Mark S., 2020. "Examining the relationship between community mobility and participation using GPS and self-report data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Delclòs-Alió, Xavier & Miralles-Guasch, Carme, 2017. "Suburban travelers pressed for time: Exploring the temporal implications of metropolitan commuting in Barcelona," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 165-174.
    2. Sturge, Jodi & Klaassens, Mirjam & Lager, Debbie & Weitkamp, Gerd & Vegter, Daan & Meijering, Louise, 2021. "Using the concept of activity space to understand the social health of older adults living with memory problems and dementia at home," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    3. Mercedes Ayuso & Montserrat Guillen & Jens Perch Nielsen, 2019. "Improving automobile insurance ratemaking using telematics: incorporating mileage and driver behaviour data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 735-752, June.
    4. Peter Schantz & Lina Wahlgren & Jane Salier Eriksson & Johan Nilsson Sommar & Hans Rosdahl, 2018. "Estimating duration-distance relations in cycle commuting in the general population," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Lo, A. W.-T. & Houston, D., 2018. "How do compact, accessible, and walkable communities promote gender equality in spatial behavior?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 42-54.
    6. Marta Poblet & Esteban García-Cuesta & Pompeu Casanovas, 2018. "Crowdsourcing roles, methods and tools for data-intensive disaster management," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 1363-1379, December.
    7. Winters, Meghan & Voss, Christine & Ashe, Maureen C. & Gutteridge, Kaitlyn & McKay, Heather & Sims-Gould, Joanie, 2015. "Where do they go and how do they get there? Older adults' travel behaviour in a highly walkable environment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 304-312.
    8. O'Connell, Heather A., 2015. "Where there's smoke: Cigarette use, social acceptability, and spatial approaches to multilevel modeling," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 18-26.
    9. Peter R. Stopher & Asif Ahmed & Wen Liu, 2017. "Travel time budgets: new evidence from multi-year, multi-day data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1069-1082, September.
    10. Jason Y. Scully & Anne Vernez Moudon & Philip M. Hurvitz & Anju Aggarwal & Adam Drewnowski, 2019. "A Time-Based Objective Measure of Exposure to the Food Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, April.
    11. Kamyar Hasanzadeh & Tiina Laatikainen & Marketta Kyttä, 2018. "A place-based model of local activity spaces: individual place exposure and characteristics," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 227-252, July.
    12. Brusilovskiy, Eugene & Klein, Louis A. & Townley, Greg & Snethen, Gretchen & McCormick, Bryan & Hiremath, Shivayogi V. & Salzer, Mark S., 2020. "Examining the relationship between community mobility and participation using GPS and self-report data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    13. Feuillet, Thierry & Bulteau, Julie & Dantan, Sophie, 2021. "Modelling context-specific relationships between neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and private car use," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    14. Yan Kestens & Basile Chaix & Martine Shareck & Julie Vallée, 2016. "Comments on Melis et al . The Effects of the Urban Built Environment on Mental Health: A Cohort Study in a Large Northern Italian City. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health , 2015, 12 , 14898–14915," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-4, February.
    15. Dharmowijoyo, Dimas B.E. & Susilo, Yusak O. & Karlström, Anders & Adiredja, Lili Somantri, 2015. "Collecting a multi-dimensional three-weeks household time-use and activity diary in the Bandung Metropolitan Area, Indonesia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 231-246.
    16. Chiara Calastri & Romain Crastes dit Sourd & Stephane Hess, 2020. "We want it all: experiences from a survey seeking to capture social network structures, lifetime events and short-term travel and activity planning," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 175-201, February.
    17. Marta Poblet & Esteban García-Cuesta & Pompeu Casanovas, 0. "Crowdsourcing roles, methods and tools for data-intensive disaster management," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-17.
    18. Timothée Cuignet & Camille Perchoux & Geoffrey Caruso & Olivier Klein & Sylvain Klein & Basile Chaix & Yan Kestens & Philippe Gerber, 2020. "Mobility among older adults: Deconstructing the effects of motility and movement on wellbeing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 383-401, February.
    19. Tsoleridis, Panagiotis & Choudhury, Charisma F. & Hess, Stephane, 2022. "Deriving transport appraisal values from emerging revealed preference data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 225-245.
    20. Tzuyuan Stessa Chao & Xiaoqin Jiang & Yi Sun & Jheng-Ze Yu, 2021. "A Space-Time Analysis of Rural Older People’s Outdoor Mobility and Its Impact on Self-Rated Health: Evidence from a Taiwanese Rural Village," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-18, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:220:y:2019:i:c:p:193-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.