IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v15y2021i1p494-504n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking leadership models after COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Abramiuc Todoran Teodora

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Popa Raluca Andreea

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Leadership models in the times of COVID-19 is surely the topic of the hour, yet this hour might last for some few years. By the end of it, we will reach the point of no return and a new set of rules and paradigms would have been created. Many researchers and leadership representatives investigate this topic. The available and reviewed literature is rather shaping the discrepancies of the past-embedded practices, as opposed to the current challenges. In this context of constant change, the current paper is aiming to investigate some current leadership practices, which are targeting the level of productivity, different ways of working and communicating in the work from home context. Moreover, the research would be setting the stage for something that is not there yet, in the current leadership patterns. The research methodology based on top management and senior leaders’ interviews, covering multiple industries from Romania, like banking, energy, manufacturing at large scale and outsourcing. The questions were designed to investigate the realities on their new job definition, from a personal perspective, as people managers and the business value outcomes envisioned in the new scheme of work. The theoretical contribution of the paper is to define a set of guidelines and filtering areas of leadership focus. The set of information gathered for new business metrics of performance, the ownership, efficiency and business value creation is pushed at all levels. One major change is the new definition of discipline, shifting from authority into entrepreneurial attitudes.

Suggested Citation

  • Abramiuc Todoran Teodora & Popa Raluca Andreea, 2021. "Rethinking leadership models after COVID-19," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 494-504, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:494-504:n:6
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2021-0045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2021-0045
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2021-0045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sahebjamnia, Navid & Torabi, S. Ali & Mansouri, S. Afshin, 2018. "Building organizational resilience in the face of multiple disruptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 63-83.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Maria Corrales-Estrada & Loyda Lily Gómez-Santos & Cesar Augusto Bernal-Torres & Jaime Eric Rodriguez-López, 2021. "Sustainability and Resilience Organizational Capabilities to Enhance Business Continuity Management: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-25, July.
    2. Yingqi Liu & Ruijun Chen & Fei Zhou & Shuang Zhang & Juan Wang, 2021. "Analysis of the Influencing Factors of Organizational Resilience in the ISM Framework: An Exploratory Study Based on Multiple Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Yuan, Ruizhi & Luo, Jun & Liu, Martin J. & Yu, Jiang, 2022. "Understanding organizational resilience in a platform-based sharing business: The role of absorptive capacity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 85-99.
    4. Seyedmohsen Hosseini & Dmitry Ivanov, 2022. "A new resilience measure for supply networks with the ripple effect considerations: a Bayesian network approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 581-607, December.
    5. Ali Torabi, S. & Shokr, Iman & Tofighi, Saeideh & Heydari, Jafar, 2018. "Integrated relief pre-positioning and procurement planning in humanitarian supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 123-146.
    6. Antonio Miceli & Birgit Hagen & Maria Pia Riccardi & Francesco Sotti & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2021. "Thriving, Not Just Surviving in Changing Times: How Sustainability, Agility and Digitalization Intertwine with Organizational Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    7. João Paulo Santos Aragão & Marcele Elisa Fontana, 2022. "Outsourcing Strategies in Public Services under Budgetary Constraints: Analysing Perceptions of Public Managers," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 61-77, March.
    8. Xin Huang & Huitong Yang & Peijin Yang, 2024. "The Impact of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions on Corporate Organisational Resilience: Insights from Dynamic Capability Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Wang, Feng & Tian, Jin & Shi, Chenli & Ling, Jiamu & Chen, Zian & Xu, Zhengguo, 2024. "A multi-stage quantitative resilience analysis and optimization framework considering dynamic decisions for urban infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    10. Margherita, Alessandro & Heikkilä, Marikka, 2021. "Business continuity in the COVID-19 emergency: A framework of actions undertaken by world-leading companies," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 683-695.
    11. Ismail Gölgeci & Harun Emre Yildiz & Ulf Andersson, . "The rising tensions between efficiency and resilience in global value chains in the post-COVID-19 world," UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    12. Saheeb Ahmed Kayani & Salman Sagheer Warsi & Raja Awais Liaqait, 2023. "A Smart Decision Support Framework for Sustainable and Resilient Supplier Selection and Order Allocation in the Pharmaceutical Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-30, March.
    13. Weijia Li & Ziyang Liu, 2023. "Social, Environmental, and Governance Factors on Supply-Chain Performance with Mediating Technology Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Reihaneh Hajishirzi & Carlos J. Costa & Manuela Aparicio, 2022. "Boosting Sustainability through Digital Transformation’s Domains and Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, February.
    15. Malgorzata Slawinska & Sebastian Kubasinski, 2021. "Designing the Conditions for the Proactive Attitude of Employees to Increase Organizational Resilience," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 5), pages 697-708.
    16. Safinaz H. Abourokbah & Reem M. Mashat & Mohammad Asif Salam, 2023. "Role of Absorptive Capacity, Digital Capability, Agility, and Resilience in Supply Chain Innovation Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, February.
    17. Mohammad Najarian & Gino J. Lim, 2019. "Design and Assessment Methodology for System Resilience Metrics," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1885-1898, September.
    18. Haibo Chen & Zongjun Wang & Xuesong Yu & Qin Zhong, 2022. "Research on the Anti-Risk Mechanism of Mask Green Supply Chain from the Perspective of Cooperation between Retailers, Suppliers, and Financial Institutions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2019. "Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 285-307.
    20. Ahmad Jafari Ghezelhesar & Ali Bozorgi-Amiri, 2022. "A novel approach to selection of resilient measures portfolio under disruption and uncertainty: a case study of e-payment service providers," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5477-5527, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:15:y:2021:i:1:p:494-504:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.