IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v14y2020i1p1109-1120n104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

IoT Communication Security Issues for Companies: Challenges, Protocols and The Web of Data

Author

Listed:
  • Zamfiroiu Alin

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, National Institute for Research-Development in Informatics Bucharest)

  • Iancu Bogdan

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Boja Catalin

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Georgescu Tiberiu-Marian

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Cartas Cosmin

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Popa Marius

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Toma Cristian Valeriu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This article analyzes and highlights the security perspective of Internet of Things (IoT) connected devices and their communication challenges, as IoT is considered one of the key emerging fields in Industry 4.0. The IoT architectures can consist of physical systems, virtual ones or even hybrids, combining a collection of different physically active things, sensors, cloud services, specific IoT protocols, communication layers, users and developers. On top of all, it is the business layer, because the scope of the entire IoT environment is to deliver data, to monitor and to facilitate the management of complex processes. In order to facilitate the data exchange between the IoT layers, there have been developed a series of protocols particular to the IoT domain. As in many IT related fields, the solutions are not perfect from the data security and privacy perspectives, many challenges being still open research issues. As the two concepts of IoT and Cloud of Things are connected, bringing real world data into the Cloud to process it, raises Cloud Computing security concerns regarding the privacy and security of data. Although in recent years, many efforts have been made to improve Cloud Computing security, there are risks that need to be taken into consideration. From the Web of Data’s point of view, things are even more prone to security risks. Because privacy is one of the fundamental right of digital users, it is extremely important for new technologies to comply with privacy regulations and policies, such as the new European data protection and privacy frameworks. In this context, companies must take into account standards, challenges and new trends in IoT. In the absence of specific measures, raw or processed data can be easily stolen from the Web of Data. In this paper we analyze and present the main protocols of communication in the IoT field from a data security perspective. Also, we do a review of the main architectures that can improve the security of the communication between IoT devices and the Cloud data storage.

Suggested Citation

  • Zamfiroiu Alin & Iancu Bogdan & Boja Catalin & Georgescu Tiberiu-Marian & Cartas Cosmin & Popa Marius & Toma Cristian Valeriu, 2020. "IoT Communication Security Issues for Companies: Challenges, Protocols and The Web of Data," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 1109-1120, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:1109-1120:n:104
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2020-0104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2020-0104
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2020-0104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Razvan Bologa & Ana-Ramona Lupu & Catalin Boja & Tiberiu Marian Georgescu, 2017. "Sustaining Employability: A Process for Introducing Cloud Computing, Big Data, Social Networks, Mobile Programming and Cybersecurity into Academic Curricula," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreja Mihailović & Julija Cerović Smolović & Ivan Radević & Neli Rašović & Nikola Martinović, 2021. "COVID-19 and Beyond: Employee Perceptions of the Efficiency of Teleworking and Its Cybersecurity Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Evin Özkan & Neda Azizi & Omid Haass, 2021. "Leveraging Smart Contract in Project Procurement through DLT to Gain Sustainable Competitive Advantages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Julian Marius Müller & Daniel Kiel & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2018. "What Drives the Implementation of Industry 4.0? The Role of Opportunities and Challenges in the Context of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Jung Eon Kwon, 2019. "Work Volition and Career Adaptability as Predictors of Employability: Examining a Moderated Mediating Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Judit Nagy & Judit Oláh & Edina Erdei & Domicián Máté & József Popp, 2018. "The Role and Impact of Industry 4.0 and the Internet of Things on the Business Strategy of the Value Chain—The Case of Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-25, September.
    6. Rimalini Gadekar & Bijan Sarkar & Ashish Gadekar, 2022. "Key performance indicator based dynamic decision-making framework for sustainable Industry 4.0 implementation risks evaluation: reference to the Indian manufacturing industries," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(1), pages 189-249, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:1109-1120:n:104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.