IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v12y2018i1p829-842n74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intergenerational gap dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Radulescu Madalina Mirela

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ghinea Valentina Mihaela

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Cantaragiu Ramona

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Diversity, sustainability and change are words nowadays commonly encountered in business practice and theory. Businesses face multiple challenges in regards to complexity, innovation, creativity, digitalization and out of the box thinking. However, what underlies these challenges is dealing with a very diverse workforce comprised of multiple generations with very different takes in regards to employment, career development, team work, authority and many other organizational aspects. Basically, business continuity nowadays depends in a large degree on the ability to manage the workforce comprised of employees belonging to the Silents, the Baby Boomers, Generation X and Generation Y, and to prepare for the entrance on the labor market of Generation Z, the first generation that grew up in the digital world. Classification into generations is not without its contestations, but it continues nonetheless to be an important determinant of the way in which businesses design their human resources strategies. Based on a quantitative survey of the opinions of employees from various backgrounds in regards to intergenerational dynamics and conflicts, the present research uncovers the relevancy of the classification into generations for the human resources practices. The research also provides an insight into the main challenges that arise from the existence of differences in the points of view of these four main generations and concludes with a series of recommendations for human resources managers and leaders in general. The article’s innovativeness lies in the fact that it emphasizes the need for the development of human resources strategies which take in consideration all the generations in an equal manner, thus criticizing the current trends in human resources practice which rely on the development of programs specifically targeted to certain generations.

Suggested Citation

  • Radulescu Madalina Mirela & Ghinea Valentina Mihaela & Cantaragiu Ramona, 2018. "Intergenerational gap dynamics," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 829-842, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:829-842:n:74
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2018-0074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2018-0074
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2018-0074?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wongupparaj, Peera & Wongupparaj, Rangsirat & Kumari, Veena & Morris, Robin G., 2017. "The Flynn effect for verbal and visuospatial short-term and working memory: A cross-temporal meta-analysis," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 71-80.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wongupparaj, Peera & Wongupparaj, Rangsirat & Morris, Robin G. & Kumari, Veena, 2023. "Seventy years, 1000 samples, and 300,000 SPM scores: A new meta-analysis of Flynn effect patterns," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Egeland, Jonathan, 2022. "The ups and downs of intelligence: The co-occurrence model and its associated research program," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Meisenberg, Gerhard & Lynn, Richard, 2023. "Ongoing trends of human intelligence," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    4. Gibbons, Aisa & Warne, Russell T., 2019. "First publication of subtests in the Stanford-Binet 5, WAIS-IV, WISC-V, and WPPSI-IV," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 9-18.
    5. Protzko, John, 2020. "Kids These Days! Increasing delay of gratification ability over the past 50 years in children," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    6. Lazaridis, Alexandros & Vetter, Marco & Pietschnig, Jakob, 2022. "Domain-specificity of Flynn effects in the CHC-model: Stratum II test score changes in Germanophone samples (1996–2018)," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:829-842:n:74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.