IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/otamic/v12y2020i1p2158-2169n11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organisational culture of construction companies in Lagos State, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Alao T.O.

    (Department of Building, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-ife, Ibadan, Oyo Nigeria)

  • Aina O.O.

    (Professor, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-ife, Nigeria)

Abstract

The study investigated the cultural features of construction companies in Lagos state and determined the organisational culture profile of the construction companies in the study area, with a view to providing information that could enhance the organisational performance of Nigeria construction firms. Primary data were sourced through the administration of 196 structured questionnaires to 98 construction companies (i.e., two questionnaires per company) represented by their construction professionals and administrative staff. The information elicited from the returned 140 questionnaires (71% return rate) included features of organisational culture and dominant characteristic element of organisational culture profile of the construction companies. Data collected for this study were analysed using percentages, factor analysis and mean score (MS). The result showed a dominant organisational cultural feature of strategic direction explaining 17.73% variance in respondent’s perception. However, communication (9.66%), adaptability (8.43%) and employee involvement (6.88%) were also relevant. The organisational culture profile showed a predominant market culture (MC) with focus on production and goal accomplishment (MS = 3.62), a hierarchy culture (HC) of a coordinator, organiser and efficiency expert (MS = 3.60) and an ad hoc culture with strategic emphasis on dynamics and readiness (MS = 3.56). The family type of culture is undermined within the companies (MS = 3.47). The study concluded that strategic direction being a MC feature corroborates a predominant MC revealed by assessing organisational culture of construction companies in Lagos state, Nigeria.

Suggested Citation

  • Alao T.O. & Aina O.O., 2020. "Organisational culture of construction companies in Lagos State, Nigeria," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 2158-2169, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:otamic:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:2158-2169:n:11
    DOI: 10.2478/otmcj-2020-0012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/otmcj-2020-0012
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/otmcj-2020-0012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tamar Gutner & Alexander Thompson, 2010. "The politics of IO performance: A framework," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 227-248, September.
    2. N. A. Ankrah & D. A. Langford, 2005. "Architects and contractors: a comparative study of organizational cultures," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 595-607.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Zürn & Alexandros Tokhi & Martin Binder, 2021. "The International Authority Database," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(4), pages 430-442, September.
    2. Tadie Degie Yigzaw & Kidane Mengisteab, 2024. "Ethiopia’s and Kenya’s Use of Military Force as an Instrument of Foreign Policy in Post-1991 Somalia," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 80(1), pages 133-148, March.
    3. Martin Binder & Monika Heupel, 2020. "Rising Powers, UN Security Council Reform, and the Failure of Rhetorical Coercion," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 93-103, October.
    4. Zbigniew Brodziński & Piotr Bórawski & James W Dunn, 2017. "Development of Non-Governmental Organizations in Poland," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 11(4), December.
    5. Sanderink, Lisa & Nasiritousi, Naghmeh, 2020. "How institutional interactions can strengthen effectiveness: The case of multi-stakeholder partnerships for renewable energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    6. Andrew Lugg, 2024. "Re-contracting intergovernmental organizations: Membership change and the creation of linked intergovernmental organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 545-577, September.
    7. Moser, Fabian & Bump, Jesse B., 2022. "Assessing the World Health Organization: What does the academic debate reveal and is it democratic?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    8. Heidi Hardt, 2018. "Who matters for memory: Sources of institutional memory in international organization crisis management," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 457-482, September.
    9. Coen, David & Kreienkamp, Julia & Tokhi, Alexandros & Pegram, Tom, 2022. "Making global public policy work: A survey of international organization effectiveness," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(5), pages 656-668.
    10. Ryan Federo & Angel Saz-Carranza, 2017. "Devising Strategic Plans to improve Organizational Performance of Intergovernmental Organizations," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(2), pages 202-212, May.
    11. Oscar Widerberg & Frank Laerhoven, 2014. "Measuring the autonomous influence of an international bureaucracy: the Division for Sustainable Development," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 303-327, November.
    12. Baltag, Dorina and Michael Smith, 2015. "EU and member states diplomacies in Moldova and Ukraine: Examining EU diplomatic performance post-Lisbon," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 19, January.
    13. Manfred Elsig, 2010. "The World Trade Organization at work: Performance in a member-driven milieu," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 345-363, September.
    14. Steffek, Jens, 2014. "The democratic output legitimacy of international organizations," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2014-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    15. Manuela Moschella, 2014. "Monitoring Macroeconomic Imbalances: Is EU Surveillance More Effective than IMF Surveillance?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(6), pages 1273-1289, November.
    16. David Coen & Julia Kreienkamp & Alexandros Tokhi & Tom Pegram, 2022. "Making global public policy work: A survey of international organization effectiveness," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(5), pages 656-668, November.
    17. Mark Pollack & Emilie Hafner-Burton, 2010. "Mainstreaming international governance: The environment, gender, and IO performance in the European Union," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 285-313, September.
    18. Ms. Ghada Fayad & Chengyu Huang & Yoko Shibuya & Peng Zhao, 2020. "How Do Member Countries Receive IMF Policy Advice: Results from a State-of-the-art Sentiment Index," IMF Working Papers 2020/007, International Monetary Fund.
    19. Julia Gray & Jonathan Slapin, 2012. "How effective are preferential trade agreements? Ask the experts," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 309-333, September.
    20. Zürn, Michael & Tokhi, Alexandros & Binder, Martin, 2021. "The International Authority Database," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(4), pages 430-442.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:otamic:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:2158-2169:n:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.