IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/organi/v50y2017i4p325-338n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation Leaders, Modest Innovators and Non-innovative SMEs in Slovakia: Key Factors and Barriers of Innovation Activity

Author

Listed:
  • Lesáková Ľubica

    (Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Faculty of Economics, Tajovského 10, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia)

  • Gundová Petra

    (Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Faculty of Economics, Tajovského 10, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia)

  • Kráľ Pavol

    (Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Faculty of Economics, Tajovského 10, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia)

  • Ondrušová Andrea

    (Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Faculty of Economics, Tajovského 10, Banská Bystrica, Slovakia)

Abstract

Background and Purpose: The field of innovation represents for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) a fundamental challenge. If the number of innovative SMEs is to rise, it is necessary to identify key factors determining their innovation activity and eliminate the innovation barriers. The main purpose of the paper is to present the results of primary research focused on identification (evaluation) of key factors and barriers determining innovation activities in Slovak SMEs. The division of SMEs into three groups of enterprises: innovation leaders, modest innovators and non-innovators enables to identify the differences in managers’ perception of the main factors and barriers determining innovation activities in various types of SMEs and to formulate policy implications for Slovak SMEs.Design/Methodology/Approach: Results of the empirical research were processed using MS Excel and the statistical analysis of the data in R3.2.4. statistical system was done. For statistical tests we assumed significance level (α = 0.1).Results: Evaluating the importance of the key factors a majority of enterprises (64.71%) indicated financial resources as the most important factor for the innovations. There is no statistically significant difference in individual (analysed) factors between innovation leaders, non-innovators and innovation followers (modest innovators). The results gained from Fisher exact test (p-value = 0.11) indicated a small difference in evaluating the significance of individual barriers between innovation leaders, non-innovators and modest innovators. Majority of enterprises also see as the main barriers to develop innovation activities bureaucracy and corruption and inappropriate state support of innovation activities.Conclusion: The main implications (conclusion) coming from the research are basic recommendations for state policy makers as well as SME’s managers to foster innovation activities in enterprises. They refer to the areas of financial resources, high-quality human resources, cooperation and participation of SMEs in different networks and clusters, systematic institutional support to SMEs, well-created vision and clearly formulated aims, and willingness of enterprises to innovate. Recommendations are summarised following the results of factor’s and barrier’s evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Lesáková Ľubica & Gundová Petra & Kráľ Pavol & Ondrušová Andrea, 2017. "Innovation Leaders, Modest Innovators and Non-innovative SMEs in Slovakia: Key Factors and Barriers of Innovation Activity," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 50(4), pages 325-338, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:organi:v:50:y:2017:i:4:p:325-338:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/orga-2017-0024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/orga-2017-0024
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/orga-2017-0024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katarzyna Kozioł-Nadolna, 2020. "The Role of a Leader in Stimulating Innovation in an Organization," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:organi:v:50:y:2017:i:4:p:325-338:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.