IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/mosaro/v33y2019i3p71-98n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovative Behavior of the Poznań Agglomeration Inhabitants in the Transport Services Market

Author

Listed:
  • Sojkin Bogdan

    (University of Economics in Poznań)

  • Michalak Szymon

    (University of Economics in Poznań, Katedra Marketingu Produktu)

Abstract

The development of information and communication technologies, including in particular the modern development of mobile technologies, has an undeniable impact on people’s lives and, consequently, on consumers’ market behaviour. The growing popularity and capabilities of mobile devices, as well as the increasing availability of mobile Internet access, mean that in many markets companies are redefining their business models, in which the activities conducted via the Internet play an increasingly important role. This is particularly visible on the market of individual and public transport services, where thanks to mobile devices, as well as in consistency with trends in consumer market behaviours and the development of cities in accordance with the smart city concept, for several years now we can observe the emergence of innovative alternatives to traditional forms of transport. The pace of appearance of product innovations on the market depends, of course, to a large extent on the level of acceptance of innovation by consumers. The aim of the article is to determine the degree of innovativeness of the inhabitants of the Poznań agglomeration in the use of transport solutions available in Poznań. The research part presents the results of own research conducted in 2019 on a sample of 795 respondents. They showed that the inhabitants of the Poznań agglomeration are not afraid to use product innovations on the market of transport services and use them to a greater extent than in the case of the general population.

Suggested Citation

  • Sojkin Bogdan & Michalak Szymon, 2019. "Innovative Behavior of the Poznań Agglomeration Inhabitants in the Transport Services Market," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 33(3), pages 71-98, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:mosaro:v:33:y:2019:i:3:p:71-98:n:4
    DOI: 10.2478/minib-2019-0044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/minib-2019-0044
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/minib-2019-0044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taneli Vaskelainen & Laura Piscicelli, 2018. "Online and Offline Communities in the Sharing Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Steven Kane Curtis & Matthias Lehner, 2019. "Defining the Sharing Economy for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valeria Andreoni, 2020. "The Trap of Success: A Paradox of Scale for Sharing Economy and Degrowth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Manuel Sánchez-Pérez & Nuria Rueda-López & María Belén Marín-Carrillo & Eduardo Terán-Yépez, 2021. "Theoretical dilemmas, conceptual review and perspectives disclosure of the sharing economy: a qualitative analysis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 1849-1883, October.
    3. Suzanne, Elodie & Absi, Nabil & Borodin, Valeria, 2020. "Towards circular economy in production planning: Challenges and opportunities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 168-190.
    4. Thomas Derave & Tiago Princes Sales & Frederik Gailly & Geert Poels, 2022. "Sharing Platform Ontology Development: Proof-of-Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, February.
    5. Eirini Triantafyllidou & Anastasia Zabaniotou, 2022. "From Theory to Praxis: ‘Go Sustainable Living’ Survey for Exploring Individuals Consciousness Level of Decision-Making and Action-Taking in Daily Life Towards a Green Citizenship," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 113-139, March.
    6. Jianjia He & Thi Hoai Thuong Mai, 2021. "The Circular Economy: A Study on the Use of Airbnb for Sustainable Coastal Development in the Vietnam Mekong Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Michaël Distelmans & Ilse Scheerlinck, 2021. "Institutional Strategies in the Ridesharing Economy: A Content Analysis Based on Uber’s Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-25, July.
    8. Igor M. Stepnov & Yulia A. Kovalchuk, 2020. "Measuring value created by business models in the sharing economy," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(5), pages 58-69, November.
    9. Kusumastuti, Ratih Dyah & Nurmala, N. & Rouli, Juliana & Herdiansyah, Herdis, 2022. "Analyzing the factors that influence the seeking and sharing of information on the smart city digital platform: Empirical evidence from Indonesia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    10. Haoxiao Li & Haoyu Wen, 2019. "How Is Motivation Generated in Collaborative Consumption: Mediation Effect in Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, January.
    11. Dalia Perkumienė & Milita Vienažindienė & Biruta Švagždienė, 2021. "The Sharing Economy towards Sustainable Tourism: An Example of an Online Transport-sharing Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, October.
    12. Alessandra Chiarini & Lorenzo Compagnucci, 2022. "Blockchain, Data Protection and P2P Energy Trading: A Review on Legal and Economic Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Ilse Hellemans & Amanda J. Porter & Damla Diriker, 2022. "Harnessing digitalization for sustainable development: Understanding how interactions on sustainability‐oriented digital platforms manage tensions and paradoxes," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 668-683, February.
    14. Bo Wei & Wenfei Liu & Chong Shao & Yong Yang & Yanbing Su & Zhaoyuan Wu, 2023. "Energy Storage Sharing for Multiple Services Provision: A Computable Combinatorial Auction Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    15. Jenny Palm & Karolina Södergren & Nancy Bocken, 2019. "The Role of Cities in the Sharing Economy: Exploring Modes of Governance in Urban Sharing Practices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Rafael Laurenti & Jagdeep Singh & Joao Miguel Cotrim & Martina Toni & Rajib Sinha, 2019. "Characterizing the Sharing Economy State of the Research: A Systematic Map," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-21, October.
    17. Fritze, Martin P. & Benkenstein, Martin & Belk, Russell & Peck, Joann & Wirtz, Jochen & Claus, and Bart, 2021. "Commentaries on the Sharing Economy: Advancing New Perspectives," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 5(1), pages 3-19.
    18. Xufeng Liu & Hongmin Chen, 2020. "Sharing Economy: Promote Its Potential to Sustainability by Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, January.
    19. Halberstadt, Jantje & Kollhoff, Sophia & Kraus, Sascha & Dhir, Amandeep, 2022. "Early bird or early worm? First-mover (dis)advantages and the success of web-based social enterprises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    20. Magdalena Wojcik-Jurkiewicz & Aleksandra Lubicz-Posochowska & Marzena Czarnecka & Grzegorz Kinelski & Beata Sadowska, 2021. "Legal Aspects of Sharing Economy: The Case of Games’ Platforms," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 1196-1210.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:mosaro:v:33:y:2019:i:3:p:71-98:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.