IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/manmar/v18y2023is1p340-354n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Type-2 Q-rung Orthopair CoCoSo method for Workplace Design Problems on the Metaverse

Author

Listed:
  • Erik Adem

    (Tarsus University, Mersin, Turkey)

  • Kuvvetli Birsen Irem

    (Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye, Turkey)

  • Kuvvetli Yusuf

    (Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey)

  • Hamidy Sakhi Mohammad

    (Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey)

Abstract

The development of technology is changing and transforming business models in the production and service sectors around the world. Especially in this age when the fourth industrial revolution is effective with different instruments such as artificial intelligence, internet of things, and cyber physical systems, the necessity of physical presence of people in the workplaces is gradually decreasing. Like many things developed in the virtual world, the virtual arrangement of workplaces is a very innovative undertaking. It is clear that the advantage of time and cost are the main reasons for the positive reception of the idea of workplace design in the metaverse environment. In this article, the criteria for workplace design in the metaverse environment of a company operating in the IT sector were examined and alternative metaverse platforms for workplace design using these criteria were evaluated. CoCoSo method based on the Interval Type-2 q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets is used in making the evaluations. Among the 6 criteria seen as important in the study, privacy and security, size and scale, and functionality were the three most important criteria. Among the alternative platforms evaluated, Rooom and Voxels are the first two platforms to be preferred.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik Adem & Kuvvetli Birsen Irem & Kuvvetli Yusuf & Hamidy Sakhi Mohammad, 2023. "The Type-2 Q-rung Orthopair CoCoSo method for Workplace Design Problems on the Metaverse," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 18(s1), pages 340-354, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:18:y:2023:i:s1:p:340-354:n:5
    DOI: 10.2478/mmcks-2023-0018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2023-0018
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/mmcks-2023-0018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greenberg, Penelope Sue & Greenberg, Ralph H. & Antonucci, Yvonne Lederer, 2007. "Creating and sustaining trust in virtual teams," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 325-333.
    2. Adem Pınar & Rouyendegh Babak Daneshvar & Yavuz Selim Özdemir, 2021. "q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy TOPSIS Method for Green Supplier Selection Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yumei Luo & Qiongwei Ye, 2019. "Understanding Consumers’ Loyalty to an Online Outshopping Platform: The Role of Social Capital and Perceived Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Meng-Shan Tsai & Chi-Cheng Chang, 2014. "Exploring the Effects of Individual Emotional Regulation, Interpersonal Interaction, and Collaboration on Learning Behavior in Technology Industry," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(7), pages 844-861, July.
    3. Kasabov, Edward, 2016. "Unknown, surprising, and economically significant: The realities of electronic word of mouth in Chinese social networking sites," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 642-652.
    4. Zakaria, Norhayati & Mohd Yusof, Shafiz Affendi, 2020. "Crossing Cultural Boundaries Using the Internet: Toward Building a Model of Swift Trust Formation in Global Virtual Teams," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(1).
    5. Ketchen Jr., David J. & Craighead, Christopher W. & Buckley, M. Ronald, 2008. "Time bandits: How they are created, why they are tolerated, and what can be done about them," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 141-149.
    6. Aamir Ali Chughtai, 2021. "A Closer Look at the Relationship between Life Satisfaction and Job Performance," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(2), pages 805-825, April.
    7. Xusen Cheng & Guopeng Yin & Aida Azadegan & Gwendolyn Kolfschoten, 2016. "Trust Evolvement in Hybrid Team Collaboration: A Longitudinal Case Study," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 267-288, March.
    8. Moon, Sangkil & Kim, Moon-Yong & Iacobucci, Dawn, 2021. "Content analysis of fake consumer reviews by survey-based text categorization," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 343-364.
    9. Mihaela Daniela MOCANU, 2014. "Virtual Teams €“ An Opportunity In The Context Of Globalization," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 4(1), pages 47-53, March.
    10. Nabila JAWADI, 2014. "Developpement De La Confiance Dans Les Equipes Virtuelles : Analyse Des Effets Des Comportements De Communication," Working Papers 2014-344, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    11. Tatham, Peter & Kovács, Gyöngyi, 2010. "The application of "swift trust" to humanitarian logistics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(1), pages 35-45, July.
    12. Jackowska, Marta & Lauring, Jakob, 2021. "What are the effects of working away from the workplace compared to using technology while being at the workplace? Assessing work context and personal context in a global virtual setting," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1).
    13. Omid Jadidi & Fatemeh Firouzi & John S. Loucks & Yong Shin Park, 2022. "Multi-criteria supplier selection problem with fuzzy demand: a newsvendor model," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 375-394, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:manmar:v:18:y:2023:i:s1:p:340-354:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.