IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/losutr/v6y2015i1p11-24n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tourism sector, Travel agencies, and Transport Suppliers: Comparison of Different Estimators in the Structural Equation Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Kovačić Nataša

    (University of Rijeka / Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, Opatija, Croatia)

  • Topolšek Darja

    (University of Maribor/Faculty of Logistics, Celje, Slovenia)

  • Dragan Dejan

    (University of Maribor/Faculty of Logistics, Celje, Slovenia)

Abstract

The paper addresses the effect of external integration (EI) with transport suppliers on the efficiency of travel agencies in the tourism sector supply chains. The main aim is the comparison of different estimation methods used in the structural equation modeling (SEM), applied to discover possible relationships between EIs and efficiencies. The latter are calculated by the means of data envelopment analysis (DEA). While designing the structural equation model, the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses are also used as preliminary statistical procedures. For the estimation of parameters of SEM model, three different methods are explained, analyzed and compared: maximum likelihood (ML) method, Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (BMCMC) method, and unweighted least squares (ULS) method. The study reveals that all estimation methods calculate comparable estimated parameters. The results also give an evidence of good model fit performance. Besides, the research confirms that the amplified external integration with transport providers leads to increased efficiency of travel agencies, which might be a very interesting finding for the operational management.

Suggested Citation

  • Kovačić Nataša & Topolšek Darja & Dragan Dejan, 2015. "Tourism sector, Travel agencies, and Transport Suppliers: Comparison of Different Estimators in the Structural Equation Modeling," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 6(1), pages 11-24, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:losutr:v:6:y:2015:i:1:p:11-24:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/jlst-2015-0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jlst-2015-0007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jlst-2015-0007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Golob, Thomas F., 2003. "Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Fuentes, Ramón, 2011. "Efficiency of travel agencies: A case study of Alicante, Spain," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 75-87.
    3. Alamdari, Fariba, 2002. "Regional development in airlines and travel agents relationship," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 8(5), pages 339-348.
    4. Tor Andreassen & Bengt Lorentzen & Ulf Olsson, 2006. "The Impact of Non-Normality and Estimation Methods in SEM on Satisfaction Research in Marketing," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 39-58, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Ory & Patricia Mokhtarian, 2010. "The impact of non-normality, sample size and estimation technique on goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation modeling: evidence from ten empirical models of travel behavior," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 427-445, April.
    2. Ory, David T, 2007. "Structural Equation Modeling of Relative Desired Travel Amounts," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt8mj659fp, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    3. Ory, David Terrance, 2007. "Structural Equation Modeling of Relative Desired Travel Amounts," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7rb3x52m, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Vredin Johansson, Maria & Heldt, Tobias & Johansson, Per, 2006. "The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 507-525, July.
    5. Najaf, Pooya & Thill, Jean-Claude & Zhang, Wenjia & Fields, Milton Greg, 2018. "City-level urban form and traffic safety: A structural equation modeling analysis of direct and indirect effects," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 257-270.
    6. Yang, Yong, 2012. "Agglomeration density and tourism development in China: An empirical research based on dynamic panel data model," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 1347-1359.
    7. Ding, Yu & Lu, Huapu, 2016. "Activity participation as a mediating variable to analyze the effect of land use on travel behavior: A structural equation modeling approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 23-28.
    8. Scheiner, Joachim, 2010. "Social inequalities in travel behaviour: trip distances in the context of residential self-selection and lifestyles," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 679-690.
    9. Shengyi Gao & Patricia Mokhtarian & Robert Johnston, 2008. "Exploring the connections among job accessibility, employment, income, and auto ownership using structural equation modeling," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 42(2), pages 341-356, June.
    10. Jara-Díaz, Sergio & Rosales-Salas, Jorge, 2017. "Beyond transport time: A review of time use modeling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 209-230.
    11. Kroesen, Maarten & van Wee, Bert, 2022. "Understanding how accessibility influences health via active travel: Results from a structural equation model," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    12. Weis, Claude & Axhausen, Kay W., 2009. "Induced travel demand: Evidence from a pseudo panel data based structural equations model," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 8-18.
    13. Chen, Lu & Li, Yong-Quan & Liu, Chih-Hsing, 2019. "How airline service quality determines the quantity of repurchase intention - Mediate and moderate effects of brand quality and perceived value," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 185-197.
    14. Toktaş-Palut, Peral & Baylav, Ecem & Teoman, Seyhan & Altunbey, Mustafa, 2014. "The impact of barriers and benefits of e-procurement on its adoption decision: An empirical analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 77-90.
    15. Machado-León, José Luis & de Oña, Rocío & de Oña, Juan, 2016. "The role of involvement in regards to public transit riders' perceptions of the service," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 34-44.
    16. Golob, Thomas F. & Recker, Wilfred W. & Alvarez, Veronica M., 2004. "Safety aspects of freeway weaving sections," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 35-51, January.
    17. Gustafson, Per, 2012. "Managing business travel: Developments and dilemmas in corporate travel management," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 276-284.
    18. Gao, Shengyi & Mokhtarian, Patricia L. & Johnston, Robert A., 2008. "Non-normality of Data in Structural Equation Models," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7nf8f0v7, University of California Transportation Center.
    19. Nik Aida Suria Nik Zulkifli Ami & Rosadah Abd Majid & Mohd Hanafi Mohd Yasin, 2016. "Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Self-efficacy Instrument among Special Education Teachers," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(2), pages 172-172, February.
    20. Silva, Mafalda C. & Horta, Isabel M. & Leal, Vítor & Oliveira, Vítor, 2017. "A spatially-explicit methodological framework based on neural networks to assess the effect of urban form on energy demand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 386-398.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:losutr:v:6:y:2015:i:1:p:11-24:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.