IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/jfaccp/v4y2024i2p20-33n1002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auditors’ Evolving Responsibilities and the Rising Costs of Professional Negligence: A Comprehensive Examination

Author

Listed:
  • Awolowo Ifedapo Francis

    (Sheffield Hallam University, UK)

  • Garrow Nigel

    (Sheffield Hallam University)

  • Chan Dora

    (Sheffield Hallam University, UK)

  • Oni Anthony

    (Sheffield Hallam University, UK)

  • Abidoye Adenike

    (Sheffield Hallam University, UK)

Abstract

In recent times, professional negligence has taken centre stage in the news. The inability of auditors to uncover fraud in their clients’ financial records has become a topic of intense debate among industry professionals and regulators, with no clear consensus reached thus far. This paper employs a qualitative research approach to delve into the consequences of professional negligence and why auditors will continue to face the consequences of their failure to detect fraud in their clients’ financial records. Our research findings indicate that auditors will continue to bear the brunt of professional negligence until there is a fundamental shift in their mandate, prompting them to assume a more proactive role in detecting fraud within financial statements. The repercussions of professional negligence extend beyond financial losses, encompassing intangible costs that severely tarnish the reputation of the auditing profession.

Suggested Citation

  • Awolowo Ifedapo Francis & Garrow Nigel & Chan Dora & Oni Anthony & Abidoye Adenike, 2024. "Auditors’ Evolving Responsibilities and the Rising Costs of Professional Negligence: A Comprehensive Examination," Journal of Forensic Accounting Profession, Sciendo, vol. 4(2), pages 20-33.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:jfaccp:v:4:y:2024:i:2:p:20-33:n:1002
    DOI: 10.2478/jfap-2024-0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/jfap-2024-0007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/jfap-2024-0007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philmore Alleyne & Michael Howard, 2005. "An exploratory study of auditors’ responsibility for fraud detection in Barbados," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(3), pages 284-303, April.
    2. Grant Gay & Peter Schelluch & Ian Reid, 1997. "Users' Perceptions of the Auditing Responsibilities for the Prevention, Detection and Reporting of Fraud, Other Illegal Acts and Error," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 7(13), pages 51-61, May.
    3. Miguel Alzola, 2017. "Beware of the Watchdog: Rethinking the Normative Justification of Gatekeeper Liability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(4), pages 705-721, February.
    4. Hian Chye Koh & E‐Sah Woo, 1998. "The expectation gap in auditing," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(3), pages 147-154, April.
    5. Jochen Bigus, 2016. "Optimism and auditor liability," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(6), pages 577-600, September.
    6. Ojo, Marianne, 2006. "Eliminating the Audit Expectations Gap : Myth or Reality?," MPRA Paper 232, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Sep 2006.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Smith, Deborah Drummond & Gleason, Kimberly C. & Kannan, Yezen H., 2021. "Auditor liability and excess cash holdings: Evidence from audit fees of foreign incorporated firms," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Dan Åžtirbu & Maria Moraru & Nicoleta Farcane & Rodica Blidisel & Adina Popa, 2009. "Fraud And Error. Auditors' Responsibility Levels," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(11), pages 1-5.
    3. Ritzer-Angerer Petra, 2020. "Was bedeuten die Vertrauensguteigenschaften der Jahresabschlussprüfung für die Regulierung der Wirtschaftsprüferhaftung?," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 69(2), pages 89-119, August.
    4. Khondaker Mizanur Rahman & Marc Bremer, 2016. "Effective Corporate Governance and Financial Reporting in Japan," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 12(Suppl. 1), pages 1-93–122.
    5. Masoud, Najeb, 2017. "An empirical study of audit expectation-performance gap: The case of Libya," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-15.
    6. Chambers, Valerie A. & Reckers, Philip M.J., 2022. "Auditor interventions that reduce auditor liability judgments," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    7. Wang, Yang & Ashton, John K. & Jaafar, Aziz, 2019. "Does mutual fund investment influence accounting fraud?," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 142-158.
    8. DiGabriele, Jim & Ojo, Marianne, 2017. "The efficiency wage hypothesis and the role of corporate governance in firm performance," MPRA Paper 80710, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Taslima Akther & Fengju Xu, 2020. "Existence of the Audit Expectation Gap and Its Impact on Stakeholders’ Confidence: The Moderating Role of the Financial Reporting Council," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, January.
    10. ABILORO, Toba Olakunle ACA & OLORUNFEMI, Oladele Ebenezer, 2021. "Determinants of Fraudulent Financial Reporting in Nigeria: Integrating Fraud Triangle Theory Elements," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(12), pages 288-297, December.
    11. Yan Yan & Juan Gao & Xinying Jiang & Yuqing Geng & Enzhong Lin, 2024. "A Study on a New 5S Model of Decent Work Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-24, January.
    12. Saher Aqel, 2011. "Auditors’ Assessments of Materiality Between Professional Judgment and Subjectivity," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 4(4), pages 72-88, August.
    13. Tomasz Iwanowicz & Bartłomiej Iwanowicz, 2019. "ISA 701 and Materiality Disclosure as Methods to Minimize the Audit Expectation Gap," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, October.
    14. Philip Reckers & Marianne Jennings & D. Jordan Lowe & Kurt Pany, 2007. "Judges' Attitudes toward the Public Accounting Profession," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 625-645.
    15. Deqiang Deng & Chenchen Ye & Fan Wu & Yijing Guo & Hao Li & Changsheng Wang, 2023. "Effect of organizational ethical self-interest climate on unethical accounting behaviour with two different motivations in China: the moderating effect of Confucian ShiZhong Thinking," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Samreen Fahim Babar & Yasir Zeeshan, 2018. "Financial Institutions and Chinese Investment: The Review of China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) Policy," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 4, ejes_v4_i.
    17. Newman WADESANGO & Nasoma DAVID & Lovemore SITSHA, 2024. "Effectiveness of Auditor’s Report as a Medium of Communication to Reduce the Level of the Audit Expectation Gap of Amon Chartered Accountants," CECCAR Business Review, Body of Expert and Licensed Accountants of Romania (CECCAR), vol. 5(7), pages 62-73, July.
    18. Hassan Mansur & Anita Tangl, Dr. Prof., 2018. "How to Bridge the Audit Expectation Gap?," Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS), , vol. 7(2), pages 61-73, April.
    19. Tanko, Muhammad, 2011. "An Empirical Analysis of Audit Expectation Gap in Nigeria," MPRA Paper 49661, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:jfaccp:v:4:y:2024:i:2:p:20-33:n:1002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.