IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ecoman/v8y2016i1p55-61n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Options for quantitative assessment of types of commercial real estate leases

Author

Listed:
  • Ginevičius Tomas

    (Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Faculty of Transport Engineering, Lithuania)

Abstract

Facing increasing business volumes and internationalisation, office lease issue is becoming increasingly relevant to business enterprises. They become an integral part of the business which determines the outcome of commercial activities. Current assessment methodologies for types of office leases are flawed because they lack comprehensiveness and they are not linked to the objective of a lease, that is improvement of business deliverables. The methods for quantitative assessment of lease types are flawed. The objective of this article is developing a hierarchical system of indicators in connection with commercial real estate (office) leases adapted for quantitative assessment using multi-criteria methods. As a result of the research, it has been obtained that such system contains three categories: economic, premises and environmental. 12 indicators fall into the first one, 24 - into the second and 16 - into the third one.

Suggested Citation

  • Ginevičius Tomas, 2016. "Options for quantitative assessment of types of commercial real estate leases," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 55-61, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ecoman:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:55-61:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/emj-2016-0006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/emj-2016-0006
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/emj-2016-0006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Franz Fuerst & Anna‐Maija Grandy, 2012. "Rational expectations?," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(2), pages 159-174, March.
    2. Sacramento, Claudia A. & Fay, Doris & West, Michael A., 2013. "Workplace duties or opportunities? Challenge stressors, regulatory focus, and creativity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 141-157.
    3. Zhang, Xiaoling, 2015. "Green real estate development in China: State of art and prospect agenda—A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-13.
    4. Piet Eichholtz & Nils Kok & John M. Quigley, 2010. "Doing Well by Doing Good? Green Office Buildings," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(5), pages 2492-2509, December.
    5. Fuerst, Franz & McAllister, Pat, 2011. "Eco-labeling in commercial office markets: Do LEED and Energy Star offices obtain multiple premiums?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(6), pages 1220-1230, April.
    6. Gang-Zhi Fan & Zsuzsa Huszár & Weina Zhang, 2013. "The Relationships between Real Estate Price and Expected Financial Asset Risk and Return: Theory and Empirical Evidence," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 568-595, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carroll, James & Denny, Eleanor & Lyons, Ronan C. & Petrov, Ivan, 2024. "Better energy cost information changes household property investment decisions: Evidence from a nationwide experiment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    2. Parkinson, Aidan & De Jong, Robert & Cooke, Alison & Guthrie, Peter, 2013. "Energy performance certification as a signal of workplace quality," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1493-1505.
    3. Fuerst, Franz & Shimizu, Chihiro, 2016. "Green luxury goods? The economics of eco-labels in the Japanese housing market," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 108-122.
    4. Gliedt, Travis & Hoicka, Christina E., 2015. "Energy upgrades as financial or strategic investment? Energy Star property owners and managers improving building energy performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 430-443.
    5. Franco, Sofia F. & Cutter, W. Bowman, 2022. "The determinants of non-residential real estate values with special reference to environmental local amenities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    6. Florian Fizaine & Pierre Voye & Catherine Baumont, 2018. "Does the Literature Support a High Willingness to Pay for Green Label Buildings? An Answer with Treatment of Publication Bias," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 128(5), pages 1013-1046.
    7. Rocco Curto & Elena Fregonara, 2019. "Monitoring and Analysis of the Real Estate Market in a Social Perspective: Results from the Turin’s (Italy) Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Prashant Das & Jonathan A. Wiley, 2014. "Determinants of premia for energy-efficient design in the office market," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 64-86, March.
    9. David Sundfors & Magnus Bonde, 2015. "Monitoring Green Buildings: A Case Study of Solutions in Experimental Buildings," LARES lares_2015_1191-1322-1-rv, Latin American Real Estate Society (LARES).
    10. Bienert, Sven, . "METASTUDIE :NACHHALTIGKEIT CONTRA RENDITE? Die Implikationen nachhaltigen Wirtschaftens für offene Immobilienfonds am Beispiel der Deka Immobilien Investment GmbH und der WestInvest GmbH," Beiträge zur Immobilienwirtschaft, University of Regensburg, Department of Economics, number 14, August.
    11. Simcoe, Timothy & Toffel, Michael W., 2014. "Government green procurement spillovers: Evidence from municipal building policies in California," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 411-434.
    12. Yong Tu, 2018. "Urban debates for climate change after the Kyoto Protocol," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(1), pages 3-18, January.
    13. Danielle C. Sanderson & Victoria M. Edwards, 2014. "What Tenants Want: UK occupiers' requirements when renting commercial property and strategic implications for landlords," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2014-03, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    14. Alexander Reichardt, 2014. "Operating Expenses and the Rent Premium of Energy Star and LEED Certified Buildings in the Central and Eastern U.S," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 413-433, October.
    15. Ramos, A. & Gago, A. & Labandeira, X. & Linares, P., 2015. "The role of information for energy efficiency in the residential sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(S1), pages 17-29.
    16. Junichiro Onishi & Yongheng Deng & Chihiro Shimizu, 2021. "Green Premium in the Tokyo Office Rent Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Fuerst, Franz & Gabrieli, Tommaso & McAllister, Patrick, 2017. "A green winner's curse? Investor behavior in the market for eco-certified office buildings," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 137-146.
    18. Liu, Nan & Zhao, Yuan & Ge, Jiaqi, 2018. "Do renters skimp on energy efficiency during economic recessions? Evidence from Northeast Scotland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 164-175.
    19. Franz Fuerst & Constantine Kontokosta & Pat McAllister, 2011. "Taking the LEED? Analyzing Spatial Variations in Market Penetration Rates of Eco-Labeled Properties," Real Estate & Planning Working Papers rep-wp2011-01, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    20. Fuerst, Franz & McAllister, Patrick, 2011. "The impact of Energy Performance Certificates on the rental and capital values of commercial property assets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 6608-6614, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ecoman:v:8:y:2016:i:1:p:55-61:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.