IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ecocul/v21y2024i2p91-106n1006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Baltic Sea Region Countries’ Progress in Leave-No-One-Behind

Author

Listed:
  • Pikturnaite Ilvija

    (Klaipedos valstybine kolegija/Higher Education Institution, Klaipeda, Lithuania)

  • Pauzuoliene Jurgita

    (Klaipedos valstybine kolegija/Higher Education Institution, Klaipeda, Lithuania)

  • Anastasiadis Foivos

    (Department of Agribusiness and Supply Chain Management, Agricultural University of Athens 1 km of Old National Road Thiva-Elefsis, GR32200 Thiva, , Greece)

  • Tsoulfas Giannis T.

    (Department of Agribusiness and Supply Chain Management, Agricultural University of Athens, 1 km of Old National Road Thiva-Elefsis, GR32200 Thiva, , Greece)

Abstract

Research purpose. The purpose of this study is to analyse the progress of the Baltic Sea Region countries in implementing the LNOB in a short-term trend. The study seeks to identify the stability of progress in a five-year period and examine which LNOB index dimensions and the sustainable development goals pose the greatest challenges in ensuring the inclusion of all members of society. Design / Methodology / Approach. The qualitative research method, document analysis was applied in the research. The analysis of Europe Sustainable Development Reports (further – SDRs) (2019-2023 period) was completed to identify the Baltic Sea Region countries’ progress in achieving the LNOB Index in the short-term trend. This analytical approach allowed a comprehensive examination of the progress recorded in the LNOB index. Through meticulous evaluation, dynamic changes unfolding over the specified five-year timeframe were unveiled, providing valuable insights into inclusive sustainable development in the Baltic Sea Region countries. Findings. Five-year period data on the Baltic Sea Region’s LNBO and SDG indicators show positive progress as the number of above-EU average countries is rising and the gap between the best and worst performers is narrowing. However, the LNOB progress is very uneven as the countries experienced some development and some regression (Finland decreased by 0.8 points, while Lithuania improved by 8 points). The analysis of LNOB dimensions revealed some challenges. In the dimension of poverty and material deprivation, countries have shown a declining trend due to lower trends for SDG2 Zero Hunger and SDG12 Responsible Consumption and Production. In the dimension of income inequality Denmark and Sweden have even worsened their trends due to the stagnating situation SDG8 Decent Work and Economic Growth and SDG10 Reduced inequalities. The dimension of Access To and Quality of Services have decreased due to declining trends in SDG4 Quality education. These findings indicate that even developed countries are vulnerable to global and national challenges. Originality / Value / Practical implications. The originality of this topic lies in our approach to a detailed assessment of the progress of the countries of the Baltic Sea region using the LNOB index and the forecasted trends in achieving sustainable development goals. Rather than focusing solely on specific targets or indicators, we take a holistic approach by analysing the LNOB Index, providing insights into the region’s commitment to sustainable development. We performed a detailed analysis of the LNOB index of the Baltic Sea region countries, based on the four dimensions of the index, and highlighted progress and challenges in the field of sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Pikturnaite Ilvija & Pauzuoliene Jurgita & Anastasiadis Foivos & Tsoulfas Giannis T., 2024. "Baltic Sea Region Countries’ Progress in Leave-No-One-Behind," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 21(2), pages 91-106.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ecocul:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:91-106:n:1006
    DOI: 10.2478/jec-2024-0021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/jec-2024-0021
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/jec-2024-0021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paulina Schiappacasse & Bernhard Müller & Le Thuy Linh, 2019. "Towards Responsible Aggregate Mining in Vietnam," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Pina Puntillo, 2023. "Circular economy business models: Towards achieving sustainable development goals in the waste management sector—Empirical evidence and theoretical implications," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 941-954, March.
    3. R. Ebrahimi & S. Choobchian & H. Farhadian & I. Goli & E. Farmandeh & H. Azadi, 2022. "Investigating the effect of vocational education and training on rural women’s empowerment," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Bárbara Galleli & Elder Semprebon & Joyce Aparecida Ramos dos Santos & Noah Emanuel Brito Teles & Mateus Santos de Freitas-Martins & Raquel Teodoro da Silva Onevetch, 2021. "Institutional Pressures, Sustainable Development Goals and COVID-19: How Are Organisations Engaging?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    5. Sagarika Dey & Priyanka Devi, 2019. "Impact of TVET on Labour Market Outcomes and Women’s Empowerment in Rural Areas: A Case Study from Cachar District, Assam," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 13(3), pages 357-371, December.
    6. Maria Sassi, 2020. "A SEM Approach to the Direct and Indirect Links between WaSH Services and Access to Food in Countries in Protracted Crises: The Case of Western Bahr-el-Ghazal State, South Sudan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-13, November.
    7. Olga Stepanova & Magdalena Romanov, 2021. "Urban Planning as a Strategy to Implement Social Sustainability Policy Goals? The Case of Temporary Housing for Immigrants in Gothenburg, Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Michel, Hanno, 2020. "From local to global: The role of knowledge, transfer, and capacity building for successful energy transitions," Discussion Papers, Research Group Digital Mobility and Social Differentiation SP III 2020-603, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    9. Hervé Corvellec & Johan Hultman & Anne Jerneck & Susanne Arvidsson & Johan Ekroos & Niklas Wahlberg & Timothy W. Luke, 2021. "Resourcification: A non‐essentialist theory of resources for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 1249-1256, November.
    10. Wilson Charles Wilson & Maja Slingerland & Frederick P. Baijukya & Hannah Zanten & Simon Oosting & Ken E. Giller, 2021. "Integrating the soybean-maize-chicken value chains to attain nutritious diets in Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(6), pages 1595-1612, December.
    11. Jones, Lindsey & d'Errico, Marco, 2019. "Whose resilience matters? Like-for-like comparison of objective and subjective evaluations of resilience," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Bin Xue & Bingsheng Liu & Tao Liang & Dong Zhao & Tao Wang & Xingbin Chen, 2022. "A heterogeneous decision criteria system evaluating sustainable infrastructure development: From the lens of multidisciplinary stakeholder engagement," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 556-579, August.
    13. Sudheesh Ramapurath Chemmencheri, 2016. "Social Protection as a Human Right in South Asia," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 10(2), pages 236-252, August.
    14. Ingrid Boas & Frank Biermann & Norichika Kanie, 2016. "Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: towards a nexus approach," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 449-464, June.
    15. Joyeeta Gupta & Louis Lebel, 0. "Access and allocation in earth system governance: lessons learnt in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
    16. Guo, Jiaqi & Wang, Qiang & Li, Rongrong, 2024. "Can official development assistance promote renewable energy in sub-Saharan Africa countries? A matter of institutional transparency of recipient countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    17. Kinyondo, Abel Alfred & Ntegwa, Magashi Joseph & Masawe, Cresencia Apolinary, 2022. "Socioeconomic Inequality in Maternal Healthcare Services: The Case of Tanzania," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 10(01), January.
    18. Francesco Bandarin & Enrico Ciciotti & Marco Cremaschi & Giovanna Madera & Paolo Perulli & Diana Shendrikova, 2020. "Which Future for Cities after COVID-19 An international Survey," Reports, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, October.
    19. Thore, Sten, 2022. "Sustainable development goal deficits and the Covid 19 pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Thilsted, Shakuntala Haraksingh & Thorne-Lyman, Andrew & Webb, Patrick & Bogard, Jessica Rose & Subasinghe, Rohana & Phillips, Michael John & Allison, Edward Hugh, 2016. "Sustaining healthy diets: The role of capture fisheries and aquaculture for improving nutrition in the post-2015 era," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 126-131.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    sustainable development; Leave No One Behind; Sustainable Development Reports; Baltic Sea Region countries.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ecocul:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:91-106:n:1006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.