IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ecocul/v21y2024i2p180-198n1012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship Between Venture Capital, Financial Innovation, And Operating Performance In Nigerian Fintech Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Olayiwola John

    (Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria)

  • Ajide Folorunsho

    (University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria)

  • Oyeyemi Jumoke

Abstract

Research Purpose. The research aimed to assess the interrelationships among venture capital funding, financial innovation, and operating performance within Nigerian fintech firms. It sought to investigate both the direct associations between these variables and the potential mediating role of financial innovation on the connection between venture capital funding and operating performance, with a focus on understanding their collective impact on the Nigerian fintech landscape. This is essential because the way business is done could be transformed by encouraging fintech innovations which will increase productivity and efficiency. Design / Methodology / Approach. To accomplish this, the study employed a primary data collection method via a questionnaire distributed to senior management personnel in two hundred FinTech companies. 220 senior management participants were purposively selected, and the gathered data underwent meticulous analysis using Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) alongside various methodologies, including weighted mean scores, Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio (HTMT), Fornell-Larcker square’s average variance extracted, Cronbach alpha, composite reliability (CR), and percentage variance. Findings. The findings revealed that the direct influence of venture capital funding on financial innovation yielded non-significant results (R2=0.220, β=0.274, t=1.116, p=0.264). Conversely, the direct impact of financial innovation (FI) on operating performance (OP) exhibited significant results (R2=0.401, β=0.559, t=5.989, p=0.000). Notably, the study discovered that venture capital funding (VC) was statistically insignificant (β=0.274, t=0.3913, p=0.362) in predicting the operating performance of fintech firms in Nigeria. Originality / Value / Practical Implications. The research established that financial innovation plays a pivotal role in augmenting the operating performance of fintech firms in Nigeria. This study addresses a gap in the literature by investigating the impact of venture capital funding and financial innovation on Nigerian fintech firms’ operational performance. It concludes that financial innovation significantly drives operational excellence, while venture capital funding has an insignificant impact, with financial innovation not substantially mediating its influence on performance. The findings underscore the significance of introducing innovative financial products and services, fostering the adoption of a cashless economy, harnessing emerging technologies such as blockchain and Artificial Intelligence, and enhancing financial literacy and awareness. These factors collectively contribute to bolstering the operating performance of fintech enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Olayiwola John & Ajide Folorunsho & Oyeyemi Jumoke, 2024. "Relationship Between Venture Capital, Financial Innovation, And Operating Performance In Nigerian Fintech Firms," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 21(2), pages 180-198.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ecocul:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:180-198:n:1012
    DOI: 10.2478/jec-2024-0027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/jec-2024-0027
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/jec-2024-0027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Loughran, Tim & Ritter, Jay R, 1997. "The Operating Performance of Firms Conducting Seasoned Equity Offerings," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(5), pages 1823-1850, December.
    2. Brahmadev Panda & N. M. Leepsa, 2017. "Agency theory: Review of Theory and Evidence on Problems and Perspectives," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 10(1), pages 74-95, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sian Owen & Jo-Ann Suchard, 2013. "The impact of venture capital/private equity investment on the performance of IPOs in Australia," Chapters, in: Mario Levis & Silvio Vismara (ed.), Handbook of Research on IPOs, chapter 19, pages 400-420, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Tsukioka, Yasutomo & Yanagi, Junya & Takada, Teruko, 2018. "Investor sentiment extracted from internet stock message boards and IPO puzzles," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 205-217.
    3. Andres, Christian & Cumming, Douglas & Karabiber, Timur & Schweizer, Denis, 2014. "Do markets anticipate capital structure decisions? — Feedback effects in equity liquidity," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 133-156.
    4. Kim, Donghan & Kim, Jun Sik & Seo, Sung Won, 2018. "What options to trade and when: Evidence from seasoned equity offerings," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 70-96.
    5. Amrou Awaysheh & Randall A. Heron & Tod Perry & Jared I. Wilson, 2020. "On the relation between corporate social responsibility and financial performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(6), pages 965-987, June.
    6. George Georgakopoulos & Kanellos Toudas & Evangelos I. Poutos & Theodoros Kounadeas & Stefanos Tsavalias, 2022. "Capital Structure, Corporate Governance, Equity Ownership and Their Impact on Firms’ Profitability and Effectiveness in the Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-10, May.
    7. David J. Brophy & Paige P. Ouimet & Clemens Sialm, 2004. "PIPE Dreams? The Performance of Companies Issuing Equity Privately," NBER Working Papers 11011, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. An Yan & Debarshi Nandy & Thomas Chemmanur, 2004. "Why Issue Mandatory Convertibles? Theory and Empirical Evidence," Econometric Society 2004 North American Winter Meetings 456, Econometric Society.
    9. Wadhwa, Kavita & Syamala, Sudhakara Reddy, 2019. "Role of market timing and market conditions: Evidence from seasoned equity offerings," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 555-566.
    10. Baldacchino & P.J. & Callus & A. & Tabone & N. & Ellul & L. & Grima & S., 2022. "The Barriers and Effectiveness of Management Monitoring by Maltese Listed Boards*," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 12(2), pages 92-127.
    11. Luc Renneboog & Peter G. Szilagyi, 2008. "Corporate Restructuring and Bondholder Wealth," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 14(4), pages 792-819, September.
    12. Patricia M. Dechow & Amy P. Hutton & Richard G. Sloan, 2000. "The Relation between Analysts' Forecasts of Long†Term Earnings Growth and Stock Price Performance Following Equity Offerings," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 1-32, March.
    13. Farida Farida* & Adhika Ramadhan & Ratih Wijayanti, 2019. "The Influence of Good Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Value: Evidence from Indonesia," International Journal of Economics and Financial Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(7), pages 177-183, 07-2019.
    14. Linn, Scott C. & Switzer, Jeannette A., 2001. "Are cash acquisitions associated with better postcombination operating performance than stock acquisitions?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 1113-1138, June.
    15. Michael J. Alderson & Brian L. Betker, 2000. "The Long-Run Performance Of Companies That Withdraw Seasoned Equity Offerings," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 23(2), pages 157-178, June.
    16. Bradshaw, Mark T. & Richardson, Scott A. & Sloan, Richard G., 2006. "The relation between corporate financing activities, analysts' forecasts and stock returns," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1-2), pages 53-85, October.
    17. John, Kose & Mateti, Ravi S. & Vasudevan, Gopala & Amira, Khaled, 2016. "Investor protection and firm value: Evidence from PIPE offerings," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 78-89.
    18. Jyh-Dean Hwang, 2013. "Are There Valuation and Operating Performance Gains from International Cross Listing? Evidence from Taiwan’s Depositary Receipt Issuers," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 3(2), pages 137-163, December.
    19. DeAngelo, Harry & DeAngelo, Linda & Stulz, René M., 2010. "Seasoned equity offerings, market timing, and the corporate lifecycle," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 275-295, March.
    20. Mahla Afghahi & Farzaneh Nassirzadeh & Davood Askarany, 2024. "Exploring the impact of customer concentration on stock price crash risk," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Venture Capital; Financial innovation; Operating; Fintech companies; PLS-SEM; Nigeria.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O16 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ecocul:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:180-198:n:1012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.