IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/cejopp/v17y2023i1p14-26n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Platform for Collaboration: The Views of Civil Society Organisations on a Local Compact

Author

Listed:
  • Kolmodin Sophie

    (Risk and Crisis Research Center (RCR). Mid Sweden University, SE-831 25, Östersund Sweden)

Abstract

A considerable degree of collaboration between civil society organisations (CSOs) and governmental organisations (GOs) occurs in various collaborative areas, such as collaborative platforms, that aim to increase mutual understanding and reach shared solutions to complex social challenges. However, little is known regarding how CSOs relate to and discuss the starting conditions for participating in collaborative platforms. By highlighting the perspectives of CSOs supporting refugees, this article shows that the starting conditions affect whether CSOs decide to participate. Nevertheless, the starting conditions are also essential for their general understanding of the platform’s aim and purpose, thus affecting more than the initial decision to participate or not. A primary barrier to their participation is the political agenda behind the platform and what role CSOs think they should have in society. Consequently, the inclusive ‘whole society approach’ that collaborative platforms intend to create might be out of reach before starting the collaboration.

Suggested Citation

  • Kolmodin Sophie, 2023. "A Platform for Collaboration: The Views of Civil Society Organisations on a Local Compact," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 14-26, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:cejopp:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:14-26:n:2
    DOI: 10.2478/cejpp-2023-0002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2023-0002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/cejpp-2023-0002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan S. Davies, 2007. "The Limits of Partnership: An Exit-Action Strategy for Local Democratic Inclusion," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55, pages 779-800, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan Davies, 2014. "Rethinking urban power and the local state: Hegemony, domination and resistance in neoliberal cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(15), pages 3215-3232, November.
    2. Jonathan S. Davies & Madeleine Pill, 2012. "Hollowing Out Neighbourhood Governance? Rescaling Revitalisation in Baltimore and Bristol," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(10), pages 2199-2217, August.
    3. Jonathan S Davies, 2012. "Network Governance Theory: A Gramscian Critique," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(11), pages 2687-2704, November.
    4. Gillian Bristow & Tom Entwistle & Frances Hines & Steve Martin, 2008. "New Spaces for Inclusion? Lessons from the ‘Three‐Thirds’ Partnerships in Wales," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 903-921, December.
    5. Nettelbladt, Gala, 2023. "Negotiating counterstrategies against the far right in Cottbus, Germany: shifting relations between the state and civil society," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Latest Ar, pages 1-20.
    6. Andrew Kythreotis, 2010. "Local strategic partnerships: a panacea for voluntary interest groups to promote local environmental sustainability? The UK context," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(4), pages 187-193.
    7. Sandro Busso, 2018. "Away from Politics? Trajectories of Italian Third Sector after the 2008 Crisis," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-20, November.
    8. Wiebren Kuindersma & Froukje G Boonstra, 2010. "The Changing Role of the State in Dutch Regional Partnerships," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 28(6), pages 1045-1062, December.
    9. Valeria Guarneros‐Meza & Mike Geddes, 2010. "Local Governance and Participation under Neoliberalism: Comparative Perspectives," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 115-129, March.
    10. Ioannis Chorianopoulos, 2009. "Tackling Social Exclusion in Greece: Citizenship and Participatory Governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 27(3), pages 527-545, June.
    11. Michael Buser, 2014. "Democratic Accountability and Metropolitan Governance: The Case of South Hampshire, UK," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(11), pages 2336-2353, August.
    12. Jonathan S Davies & André Spicer, 2015. "Interrogating Networks: Towards an Agnostic Perspective on Governance Research," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(2), pages 223-238, April.
    13. Anita Kokx & Ronald van Kempen, 2009. "Joining Forces in Urban Restructuring: Dealing with Collaborative Ideals and Role Conflicts in Breda, the Netherlands," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(5), pages 1234-1250, May.
    14. Debbie Becher, 2010. "The Participant's Dilemma: Bringing Conflict and Representation Back In," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 496-511, September.
    15. Heike Doering, 2014. "Competing Visions of Community: Empowerment and Abandonment in the Governance of Coalfield Regeneration," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 1003-1018, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:cejopp:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:14-26:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.