IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/brcebe/v1y2015i1p9n20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lean Innovation of Course Unit Contents

Author

Listed:
  • Brad Stelian

    (Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Brad Emilia

    (Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

Designing courses for emerging areas of study is subject to clear challenges. If the envisaged courses are directly paid by the students – as it is the case of this research – they are actually the customers whose requirements have to be satisfied. Traditional approaches for collecting student requirements are not feasible for building up very novel topics. For such cases, an approach for course unit design that respects the lean philosophy is introduced in this paper. Lean is about creation of more value for students with fewer resources; or maximizing value while minimizing waste. The approach is based on the paradigm that, in highly dynamic and strong competitive educational markets, top quality courses must be designed from the very early stages. A hypothesis-based process defines the “content-prototype” of the course, which is further tested via web-based surveys that are directed to potential students. Results are statistically interpreted and a refined course content is formulated. The prototype for the most delicate module of the course is elaborated to test the level of delight of potential students (also called the WOW effect). Lessons learned are then considered to design the “promoter-prototype” of the course. A focus group is then used to test if potential students will feel a special experience interacting with the course content (also known as the KANDO effect). The methodology was experimented to design a master course unit on digital entrepreneurship. Empirical researches reveal the viability of the methodology to extract the appropriate topics of a course in emerging areas of study. Researches also show that a well-piloted strategy for course delivery should be in place to achieve the desired market impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Brad Stelian & Brad Emilia, 2015. "Lean Innovation of Course Unit Contents," Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business Education, Sciendo, vol. 1(1), pages 1-9, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:brcebe:v:1:y:2015:i:1:p:9:n:20
    DOI: 10.1515/cplbu-2015-0020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/cplbu-2015-0020
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/cplbu-2015-0020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Naga Vamsi Krishna Jasti & Rambabu Kodali, 2015. "Lean production: literature review and trends," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(3), pages 867-885, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geandra Alves Queiroz & Paulo Nocera Alves Junior & Isotilia Costa Melo, 2022. "Digitalization as an Enabler to SMEs Implementing Lean-Green? A Systematic Review through the Topic Modelling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Diana Chronéer & Peter Wallström, 2016. "Exploring Waste and Value in a Lean Context," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(10), pages 282-282, September.
    3. Ghobadian, Abby & Talavera, Irene & Bhattacharya, Arijit & Kumar, Vikas & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & O'Regan, Nicholas, 2020. "Examining legitimatisation of additive manufacturing in the interplay between innovation, lean manufacturing and sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 457-468.
    4. Shahsavar, Aria & Sadeghi, J. Kiarash & Shockley, Jeff & Ojha, Divesh, 2021. "On the relationship between lean scheduling and economic performance in shipbuilding: A proposed model and comparative evaluation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    5. Sandra Brosnan & David O’Donnell & Philip O’Regan, 2019. "A performative exploration of the lifeworlds of human capital and financial capital: an intellectual capital case vignette," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(2), pages 321-344, June.
    6. Rohit Kumar Singh & Sachin Modgil, 2023. "Assessment of Lean Supply Chain Practices in Indian Automotive Industry," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 24(1), pages 68-105, February.
    7. Genc, Talat S. & De Giovanni, Pietro, 2020. "Closed-loop supply chain games with innovation-led lean programs and sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 440-456.
    8. Hao Wang & Xiaoxia Zhang & Hui Yuan & Zhiguang Wu & Ming Zhou, 2023. "A Lean Scheduling Framework for Underground Mines Based on Short Interval Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Liu, Fuzhen & He, Chaocheng & Lai, Kee-hung, 2024. "Market reaction to responsible production practices adoption: The role of firm size and financial slack," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    10. Hardcopf, Rick & Liu, Gensheng (Jason) & Shah, Rachna, 2021. "Lean production and operational performance: The influence of organizational culture," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    11. Geng, D. & Evans, S. & Kishita, Y., 2023. "The identification and classification of energy waste for efficient energy supervision in manufacturing factories," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    12. Pearce, Antony & Pons, Dirk & Neitzert, Thomas, 2018. "Implementing lean—Outcomes from SME case studies," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 94-104.
    13. Möldner, Alexander Kurt & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & Kumar, Vikas, 2020. "Exploring lean manufacturing practices' influence on process innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 233-249.
    14. Pearce, Antony & Pons, Dirk, 2019. "Advancing lean management: The missing quantitative approach," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    15. Mirjana Todorović & Milan Čupić & Dejan Jovanović, 2022. "Sustainable Lean Implementation: A Study Of Serbian Companies," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 67(234), pages 81-108, July – Se.
    16. Angelopoulos, Michail & Pollalis, Yannis, 2019. "Use of open data as a tool for successful lean management in public services: evidence from Greece," MPRA Paper 97709, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Antony Pearce & Dirk Pons & Thomas Neitzert, 2023. "Understanding Lean—Statistical Analysis of Perceptions and Self-Deception Regarding Lean Management," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1-43, June.
    18. Rachel Bocquet & Sandra Dubouloz & Tarik Chakor, 2019. "Lean Manufacturing, Human Resource Management and Worker Health: Are there Smart Bundles of Practices along the Adoption Process?," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 113-144.
    19. Marcel F. Assen, 2018. "The moderating effect of management behavior for Lean and process improvement," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, June.
    20. De Giovanni, Pietro & Cariola, Alfio, 2021. "Process innovation through industry 4.0 technologies, lean practices and green supply chains," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:brcebe:v:1:y:2015:i:1:p:9:n:20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.