IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/aicuec/v62y2015i1p1-22n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation, Innovativeness And Gender - Approaching Innovative Gender

Author

Listed:
  • Okoń-Horodyńska Ewa

    (Institute of Economics, Finance and Management, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Poland)

  • Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz Anna

    (Institute of Economics, Finance and Management, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

This paper deals with the attempt to search for the sources of creativity in the broad sense in solving problems. These creative solutions become innovations. The ability to develop innovation depends on the multi-dimensional predispositions to solve problems – those found in people, inspired by the market, organised or spontaneous, as well as facilitated or hampered by the state. Yet, the aforementioned factors should be supplemented with one more – gender. In the chapter attention is paid to the multi-dimensional differences stemming from gender, which should be perceived as a positive element, because they are the source of synergy resulting from collaboration among research or business teams in the process of innovation. The chapter introduces the concept of ‘innovative gender’ and its institutional framework. The methodological inspiration is the model known in the literature as the Innovation Genome, the conceptualization of which constitutes a major part of the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Okoń-Horodyńska Ewa & Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz Anna, 2015. "Innovation, Innovativeness And Gender - Approaching Innovative Gender," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 62(1), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:aicuec:v:62:y:2015:i:1:p:1-22:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/aicue-2015-0001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/aicue-2015-0001
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/aicue-2015-0001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janice Peterson & Doug Brown, 1994. "The Economic Status Of Women Under Capitalism," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 357.
    2. Jan Fagerberg, 2006. "What Do We Know About Innovation and Socio-economic Change? Lessons from the TEARI Project," Chapters, in: Louise Earl & Fred Gault (ed.), National Innovation, Indicators and Policy, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Rutherford, Malcolm, 1998. "Veblen's Evolutionary Programme: A Promise Unfulfilled," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 22(4), pages 463-477, July.
    4. Fagerberg, Jan & Mowery, David C. & Nelson, Richard R. (ed.), 2006. "The Oxford Handbook of Innovation," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199286805.
    5. Wilfred Dolfsma, 2009. "Structure, Agency and the Role of Values in Processes of Institutional Change," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Institutions, Communication and Values, chapter 4, pages 30-51, Palgrave Macmillan.
    6. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 2003. "The hidden persuaders: institutions and individuals in economic theory," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 27(2), pages 159-175, March.
    7. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 1998. "The Approach of Institutional Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(1), pages 166-192, March.
    8. Louise Earl & Fred Gault (ed.), 2006. "National Innovation, Indicators and Policy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3774.
    9. Chris Freeman & Luc Soete, 1997. "The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 3rd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 3, volume 1, number 0262061953, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Attila Havas, 2016. "Social and Business Innovations: Are Common Measurement Approaches Possible?," Foresight-Russia Форсайт, CyberLeninka;Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», vol. 10(2 (eng)), pages 58-80.
    2. Geoffrey M. Hodgson & Thorbjørn Knudsen, 2008. "The Complex Evolution of a Simple Traffic Convention: the Functions and Implications of Habit," International Economic Association Series, in: János Kornai & László Mátyás & Gérard Roland (ed.), Institutional Change and Economic Behaviour, chapter 9, pages 178-199, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Eduardo Fernández-Huerga & Ana Pardo & Ana Salvador, 2023. "Compatibility and complementarity between institutional and post-Keynesian economics: a literature review with a particular focus on methodology," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 40(2), pages 413-443, July.
    4. Isabelle Leroux & Paul Muller & Béatrice Plottu & Caroline Widehem, 2014. "Evolution of business models in French ?Pôles de compétitivité?: the role of intermediaries in horticultural varietal creation," ERSA conference papers ersa14p693, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Georgina M. Gómez, 2018. "Why do people want currency? Institutions, habit, and bricolage in an Argentine marketplace," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 413-430, December.
    6. Geoffrey Hodgson, 2002. "The Evolution of Institutions: An Agenda for Future Theoretical Research," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 111-127, June.
    7. Malik, Tariq H., 2013. "National institutional differences and cross-border university–industry knowledge transfer," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 776-787.
    8. Mariana Mazzucato, 2015. "From Market Fixing to Market-Creating: A New Framework for Economic Policy," SPRU Working Paper Series 2015-25, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    9. Adem LEVENT, 2016. "Power, Market and Techno-Structure in John Kenneth Galbraith’s Thought," Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, KSP Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 214-218, June.
    10. Hodgson, Geoffrey M., 2004. "Reclaiming habit for institutional economics," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 651-660, October.
    11. Havas, Attila, 2014. "Types of knowledge and diversity of business-academia collaborations: Implications for measurement and policy," MPRA Paper 65908, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 23 May 2015.
    12. Fernando Barrios Aguirre & Carolina Carcamo Vergara, 2013. "La innovación en la industria manufacturera de la Región Caribe colombiana," Revista Economía y Región, Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar, vol. 7(2), pages 119-147, December.
    13. Geels, Frank W., 2004. "From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6-7), pages 897-920, September.
    14. Bazhal, Iurii, 2013. "Innovation theory of business cycles and economic growth," MPRA Paper 53688, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 14 Feb 2014.
    15. Bazhal, Iurii, 2016. "The Theory of Economic Development of J.A. Schumpeter: Key Features," MPRA Paper 69883, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 25 Feb 2016.
    16. Marcelo Arend & Vinicius Zuniga Fagotti & Glaison Augusto Guerrero & Pedro Cezar Dutra Fonseca & Julimar da Silva Bichara, 2023. "Development strategies and path dependence: Institutional elements for making sense of Brazil's falling behind and South Korea's forging ahead," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 76(305), pages 155-180.
    17. Ritchie, Holly A., 2016. "Unwrapping Institutional Change in Fragile Settings: Women Entrepreneurs Driving Institutional Pathways in Afghanistan," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 39-53.
    18. Havas, Attila, 2011. "Governing policy processes and foresight," MPRA Paper 38119, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Szirmai, Adam, 2008. "Explaining Success and Failure in Development," MERIT Working Papers 2008-013, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    20. Joana Costa & João C.O. Matias, 2020. "Open Innovation 4.0 as an Enhancer of Sustainable Innovation Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:aicuec:v:62:y:2015:i:1:p:1-22:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.