IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/elg/eebook/357.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

The Economic Status Of Women Under Capitalism

Author

Listed:
  • Janice Peterson
  • Doug Brown

Abstract

The Economic Status of Women under Capitalism shows how institutional economics can be used to analyze the economic oppression of women and to promote progressive social and economic change.

Suggested Citation

  • Janice Peterson & Doug Brown, 1994. "The Economic Status Of Women Under Capitalism," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 357.
    • Handle: RePEc:elg:eebook:357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.e-elgar.com/shop/isbn/9781852788940
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Phillip O’Hara, 2011. "Economic Surplus, Social Reproduction, Nurturance and Love," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 40(1), pages 19-40, April.
    2. William M. Dugger, 1998. "Against Inequality," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 286-303, June.
    3. Phillip Anthony O’Hara, 2006. "The Economic Surplus, Disembedded Economy, and Nurturance Gap—The Contribution of James Ronald Stanfield to Political Economy," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 507-516, June.
    4. Ellen Mutari & Deborah Figart & Marilyn Power, 2001. "Implicit Wage Theories in Equal Pay Debates in the United States," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 23-52.
    5. Zdravka, Todorova, 2009. "Employer of Last Resort Policy and Feminist Economics: Social Provisioning and Socialization of Investment," MPRA Paper 16240, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Okoń-Horodyńska Ewa & Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz Anna, 2015. "Innovation, Innovativeness And Gender - Approaching Innovative Gender," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 62(1), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Gillian Hewitson, 2001. "A Survey of Feminist Economics," Working Papers 2001.01, School of Economics, La Trobe University.
    8. Julian Ellison, 1996. "Commons-Mitchell-Myrdal-Polanyiinstitutionalism: A review of inequality: Radical institutionalist views on race, gender, class, and nation," The Review of Black Political Economy, Springer;National Economic Association, vol. 25(2), pages 103-115, December.
    9. Phillip O’Hara, 2011. "Economic Surplus, Social Reproduction, Nurturance and Love," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 19-40, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eebook:357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.