IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/jhriss/v21y1986i2p216-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Publishing Performance of U.S. Ph.D. Programs in Economics during the 1970s

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy D. Hogan

Abstract

This paper examines the relative publishing performance of U.S. Ph.D. programs in economics for the 1970-79 period compared with the 1960-69 period. It presents information on performance both on an aggregate basis and in terms of per capita publication figures. In addition to presenting tabulations for the entire group of authors, it separately analyzes the publishing output of "recent" Ph.D.s-those authors identified as being awarded doctorates during or after 1969-70. It also compares the measures of relative publishing performance with several characteristics of the graduate programs such as size, faculty-student ratios, and faculty publication records.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy D. Hogan, 1986. "The Publishing Performance of U.S. Ph.D. Programs in Economics during the 1970s," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 21(2), pages 216-229.
    • Handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:21:y:1986:i:2:p:216-229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/145798
    Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ho Fai Chan & Benno Torgler, 2015. "The implications of educational and methodological background for the career success of Nobel laureates: an investigation of major awards," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 847-863, January.
    2. Okazaki, Koji, 2008. "A note on educational performance of economics graduate programs in East and Southeast Asia," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 92-96, February.
    3. Rebecca Long & Aleta Crawford & Michael White & Kimberly Davis, 2009. "Determinants of faculty research productivity in information systems: An empirical analysis of the impact of academic origin and academic affiliation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(2), pages 231-260, February.
    4. Brian K. Boyd, 2018. "Paradigm development in Chinese management research: The role of research methodology," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 805-827, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:21:y:1986:i:2:p:216-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jhr.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.