IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/upravl/v13y2022i6p44-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial state and investment attractiveness of Russian public companies: The effect of ESG factors

Author

Listed:
  • Irina S. Belik

    (Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Anton S. Dutsinin

    (AO Tekhnologii doveriya – Audit, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Natalia L. Nikulina

    (Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the RAS, Ekaterinburg, Russia)

Abstract

In the last decade, the ESG (environmental, social, governance) paradigm has been actively developing in commercial organization management and investment decision-making. The article examines the impact of ESG factors on the financial state and investment attractiveness of Russian public companies. The concepts of sustainable development and corporate governance constitute the theoretical framework of the research. To analyze the impact of ESG factors on the financial state and investment attractiveness of Russian public companies, we used multiple linear regression models using the least squares method. The empirical evidence is data on 80 organizations from RAEX ESG Ranking of Russian companies based on reports for 2020. A statistically significant positive relationship was found between EBITDA and return on assets, dividend yield, cash flows and ESG factors, as well as a statistically significant negative relationship was found between the price/earnings multiplier, beta coefficient and ESG factors. The study demonstrates that there is a mixed statistically significant relationship between the indicator of financial leverage and ESG factors. At that, ESG factors, which are positioned as necessary and having a positive influence on companies’ activities, can threaten both their financial state and investment attractiveness. Further ESG research imply a more detailed study of the model for assessing the impact of ESG factors on a company’s financial performance and the possibility of integrating financial and non-financial reporting standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Irina S. Belik & Anton S. Dutsinin & Natalia L. Nikulina, 2022. "Financial state and investment attractiveness of Russian public companies: The effect of ESG factors," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 13(6), pages 44-55, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:13:y:2022:i:6:p:44-55
    DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-6-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/100/4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/en/issues-2022/1147
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-6-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sadok El Ghoul & Omrane Guedhami & Hakkon Kim & Kwangwoo Park, 2018. "Corporate Environmental Responsibility and the Cost of Capital: International Evidence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 335-361, May.
    2. Bela S. Bataeva & Aglaya D. Kokurina & Nikita A. Karpov, 2021. "The impact of ESG reporting on the financial performance of Russian public companies," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(6), pages 20-32, October.
    3. Gregory, Richard Paul, 2022. "ESG activities and firm cash flow," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qian, Kun & Shi, Bingjie & Song, Yunling & Wu, Hao, 2023. "ESG performance and loan contracting in an emerging market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Song, Yunling & Wu, Hao & Ma, Yan, 2023. "Does ESG performance affect audit pricing? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Boubaker, Sabri & Liu, Pei-Zhi & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Ma, Chao-Qun, 2024. "Do anti-corruption campaigns affect corporate environmental responsibility? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Wei Peng & Baogui Xin & Yekyung Kwon, 2019. "Optimal Strategies of Product Price, Quality, and Corporate Environmental Responsibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-24, November.
    5. Ballester, Laura & González-Urteaga, Ana & Shen, Long, 2024. "Green bond issuance and credit risk: International evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    6. Driss, Hamdi & Drobetz, Wolfgang & El Ghoul, Sadok & Guedhami, Omrane, 2024. "The Sustainability committee and environmental disclosure: International evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 602-625.
    7. Mohammed Benlemlih & M. Arif & M. Nadeem, 2023. "Institutional Ownership and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Comparative Study of the UK and the USA," Post-Print hal-04435468, HAL.
    8. Zhao, Hong & Jin, Dawei & Li, Hui & Wang, Haizhi, 2021. "Affiliated bankers on board and firm environmental management: U.S. evidence," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    9. Massimo Mariani & Fabio Pizzutilo & Alessandra Caragnano & Marianna Zito, 2021. "Does it pay to be environmentally responsible? Investigating the effect on the weighted average cost of capital: Environmental commitment and the cost of capital," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1854-1869, November.
    10. Ramzi Benkraiem & Sabri Boubaker & Asif Saeed, 2022. "How does corporate social responsibility engagement affect the information content of stock prices?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(5), pages 1266-1289, July.
    11. He, Guanming & Li, Zhichao & Yu, Ling & Zhou, Zhanqiang, 2023. "Contribution to poverty alleviation: A waste or benefit for corporate financing?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    12. Umar, Muhammad & Mirza, Nawazish & Rizvi, Syed Kumail Abbas & Naqvi, Bushra, 2022. "ESG scores and target price accuracy: Evidence from sell-side recommendations in BRICS," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. Ratajczak Piotr & Mikołajewicz Grzegorz, 2021. "The impact of environmental, social and corporate governance responsibility on the cost of short-and long-term debt," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 74-96, June.
    14. Hasan, Iftekhar & Noth, Felix & Tonzer, Lena, 2023. "Cultural norms and corporate fraud: Evidence from the Volkswagen scandal," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    15. Benjamin Lynch & Martha O'Hagan‐Luff, 2024. "Relative corporate social performance and cost of equity capital: International evidence," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(3), pages 2882-2910, July.
    16. Shih, Yi-Cheng & Wang, Yao & Zhong, Rui & Ma, Yi-Ming, 2021. "Corporate environmental responsibility and default risk: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    17. Zhu, Minghao & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Zhou, Honggeng, 2021. "Diversify or concentrate: The impact of customer concentration on corporate social responsibility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    18. Zhenghui Li & Gaoke Liao & Khaldoon Albitar, 2020. "Does corporate environmental responsibility engagement affect firm value? The mediating role of corporate innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1045-1055, March.
    19. Yu, Xiaojun & Li, Qiang & Zhang, Lin, 2024. "Major government customer and corporate environmental responsibility: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    20. Maximilian Focke, 2022. "Do sustainable institutional investors influence senior executive compensation structures according to their preferences? Empirical evidence from Europe," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1109-1121, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:13:y:2022:i:6:p:44-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.