IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/upravl/v13y2022i3p2-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The principal–agent problem amid digital transformation

Author

Listed:
  • Evgeny V. Popov

    (Ural Institute of Management (RANEPA), Ekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Viktoriya L. Simonova

    (Ural Institute of Management (RANEPA), Ekaterinburg, Russia)

  • Vitaly V. Cherepanov

    (Ural Institute of Management (RANEPA), Ekaterinburg, Russia)

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of digital technologies, the economic nature and essence of digital transformation remain understudied. The article examines the aspects of the principal–agent problem amid digital transformation, which implies replacing a person or analogue machines with digital technologies. Transformation is needed to gain additional economic advantages or improve the flexibility of the organization’s activities within the concept of Industry 4.0. The research demonstrates that the underlying economic reason for digital transformation is to solve the problem of information asymmetry and overcome the principal–agent conflict through the use of digital technologies. The concept of digital transformation and the principles of the principal–agent theory constitute the methodological basis of the study. Among the research methods were generalization, the inductive method of knowledge formation, and the assessment of the conclusions’ completeness with the involvement of theorists and practitioners in the field under consideration. The study allowed broadening the understanding of the principal–agent theory: establishing the roles of a human agent and a machine agent, as well as highlighting the essential economic aspects of digital transformation. The results obtained can be used to create digital transformation methodologies and research on the organization of labour in this field.

Suggested Citation

  • Evgeny V. Popov & Viktoriya L. Simonova & Vitaly V. Cherepanov, 2022. "The principal–agent problem amid digital transformation," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 13(3), pages 2-15, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:13:y:2022:i:3:p:2-15
    DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-3-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/97/1n.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/en/issues-2022/1022
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-3-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asheem Shrestha & Jolanta Tamošaitienė & Igor Martek & M Reza Hosseini & David J Edwards, 2019. "A Principal-Agent Theory Perspective on PPP Risk Allocation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Kim, Eun-Sung, 2020. "Deep learning and principal–agent problems of algorithmic governance: The new materialism perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Maren Gierlich-Joas & Thomas Hess & Rahild Neuburger, 2020. "More self-organization, more control—or even both? Inverse transparency as a digital leadership concept," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 921-947, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lijuan Wu & Shanyue Jin, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability: From a Corporate Governance Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.
    2. König, Pascal D. & Wenzelburger, Georg, 2021. "The legitimacy gap of algorithmic decision-making in the public sector: Why it arises and how to address it," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Weber, Ellen & Büttgen, Marion & Bartsch, Silke, 2022. "How to take employees on the digital transformation journey: An experimental study on complementary leadership behaviors in managing organizational change," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 225-238.
    4. Turgut Karakose & Ibrahim Kocabas & Ramazan Yirci & Stamatios Papadakis & Tuncay Yavuz Ozdemir & Murat Demirkol, 2022. "The Development and Evolution of Digital Leadership: A Bibliometric Mapping Approach-Based Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Juliana Salvadorinho & Leonor Teixeira, 2023. "Happy and Engaged Workforce in Industry 4.0: A New Concept of Digital Tool for HR Based on Theoretical and Practical Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-29, February.
    6. Jinjin Wang & Jiadi Yang, 2022. "Culture shaping and value realization of digital media art under Internet+," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(3), pages 1124-1133, December.
    7. Kim, Eun-Sung & Oh, Yoehan & Yun, Gi Woong, 2023. "Sociotechnical challenges to the technological accuracy of computer vision: The new materialism perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    8. Valentin Zieglmeier & Maren Gierlich-Joas & Alexander Pretschner, 2022. "Increasing Employees' Willingness to Share: Introducing Appeal Strategies for People Analytics," Papers 2209.05387, arXiv.org.
    9. Jolanta Tamošaitienė & Vahidreza Yousefi & Hamed Tabasi, 2021. "Project Portfolio Construction Using Extreme Value Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, January.
    10. Gabriel Castelblanco & Jose Guevara & Harrison Mesa & Diego Flores, 2020. "Risk Allocation in Unsolicited and Solicited Road Public-Private Partnerships: Sustainability and Management Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, June.
    11. Borch, Christian, 2022. "Machine learning, knowledge risk, and principal-agent problems in automated trading," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    12. Christiono Utomo & Sulfiah Dwi Astarini & Dewa Made Satriya Wibawa Mertha & Yani Rahmawati & Aqsha & Cahyono Bintang Nurcahyo & Maulita Nahdiyah, 2022. "Decision Factors of Stakeholder Integration in Connected Construction for Circular Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Vu Minh Ngo & Huan Huu Nguyen & Hiep Cong Pham & Long Hoang Nguyen, 2024. "Engage or retreat? Exploring the determinants of participation in Climate Finance public-private partnerships," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(7), pages 1-30, July.
    14. Milosavljević, Miloš & Radovanović, Sandro & Delibašić, Boris, 2023. "What drives the performance of tax administrations? Evidence from selected european countries," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    15. Yan Wang & Yujie Wang & Xiuyu Wu & Jiwang Li, 2020. "Exploring the Risk Factors of Infrastructure PPP Projects for Sustainable Delivery: A Social Network Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-26, May.
    16. Lima, Sónia & Brochado, Ana & Marques, Rui Cunha, 2021. "Public-private partnerships in the water sector: A review," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    17. Peter Agyekum Boateng, PhD, 2023. "Engage, Explore, Enlighten: Proposing an Interactive Visualization and Analysis Model (IVAm) in Quantitative Research," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(12), pages 1701-1711, December.
    18. Juan Tan & Jinyu Wei, 2024. "Configurational Analysis of ESG Performance, Innovation Intensity, and Financial Leverage: a Study on Total Factor Productivity in Chinese Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 13803-13827, September.
    19. Hongqiang Wang & Qiaoyan Lin & Yingjie Zhang, 2022. "Risk Cost Measurement of Value for Money Evaluation Based on Case-Based Reasoning and Ontology: A Case Study of the Urban Rail Transit Public-Private Partnership Projects in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, May.
    20. Pamela Akinyi Oyieyo & Charles M. Rambo & Anne Ndiritu, 2020. "Ranking the prevalence of construction cost overrun risk factors in completion of public-private partnership projects: A case of the Sondu-Miriu hydro-electric power project in Kenya," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(5), pages 351-356, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    digital transformation; principal–agent problem; machine agent; human agent; digital agent; physical agent; information asymmetry; principal–agent conflict; digital twin;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B53 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Austrian
    • O39 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Other
    • P42 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Productive Enterprises; Factor and Product Markets; Prices

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:13:y:2022:i:3:p:2-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.