IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/upravl/v13y2022i2p34-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decent work in non-financial reporting of Russian companies: Assessing the disclosure quality

Author

Listed:
  • Evgeniya V. Nekhoda

    (National Research Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia)

  • Nurali U. Arabov

    (Samarkand State University, Samarkand, Republic of Uzbekistan)

  • Aleksandr L. Bogdanov

    (National Research Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia)

  • Maria V. German

    (National Research Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia)

  • Tatyana V. Kuklina

    (National Research Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia)

Abstract

Non-financial reporting is the key institution for monitoring the provision of decent work for employees. The analysis of Russian companies’ reports has shown that the low quality of decent work disclosures is attributed to the lack of data and collection and calculation methods. The article examines the current practices for evaluating non-financial reporting, presents the author’s approach to assessing the quality of decent work disclosures and reveals the relationship between the completeness of disclosed information and companies’ performance. Methodologically, the study rests upon the concept of corporate governance. Among the research methods used are quantitative, qualitative (content) and statistical analysis. The proposed assessment approach was tested at metallurgical and mining enterprises, which allowed identifying main gaps between the companies’ ranking positions and the practical provision of decent work for employees. A positive relationship was revealed between the completeness of disclosed information about decent work and the companies’ financial performance as well as labor productivity. The authors come up with recommendations for state regulation in the field of non-financial reporting. The proposed approach allows conducting a fair assessment of the depth of disclosure in non-financial reporting and comparing the levels of provision with decent work in different companies, which together will contribute to improving the effectiveness of the positioning strategy and formation of its unique socially oriented image.

Suggested Citation

  • Evgeniya V. Nekhoda & Nurali U. Arabov & Aleksandr L. Bogdanov & Maria V. German & Tatyana V. Kuklina, 2022. "Decent work in non-financial reporting of Russian companies: Assessing the disclosure quality," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 13(2), pages 34-56, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:34-56
    DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-2-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/96/3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://upravlenets.usue.ru/en/issues-2022/992
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-2-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stewart Jones & Geoff Frost & Janice Loftus & Sandra Laan, 2007. "An Empirical Examination of the Market Returns and Financial Performance of Entities Engaged in Sustainability Reporting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(41), pages 78-87, March.
    2. Hina Ismail & Muhammad A. Saleem & Sadaf Zahra & Muhammad S. Tufail & Rao Akmal Ali, 2021. "Application of Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Principles for Measuring Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure: Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-19, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pavel A. Mikhnenko, 2022. "Transformation of the largest Russian companies’ business vocabulary in annual reports: Data Mining," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 13(5), pages 17-33, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert A. Kingwara, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Financial Performance of Firms in Kenya: A Stakeholder Approach," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(3), pages 90-115, September.
    2. Nazim Hussain, 2015. "Impact of Sustainability Performance on Financial Performance: An Empirical Study of Global Fortune (N100) Firms," Working Papers 1, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    3. Stewart Jones & Sandra van der Laan & Geoff Frost & Janice Loftus, 2008. "The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Investment Funds in Australia," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 80(2), pages 181-203, June.
    4. Moonsoo Kang & K. G. Viswanathan & Nancy A. White & Edward J. Zychowicz, 2022. "Sustainability Efforts, Index Recognition, and Stock Performance," Springer Books, in: Marielle de Jong & Dan diBartolomeo (ed.), Risks Related to Environmental, Social and Governmental Issues (ESG), pages 45-57, Springer.
    5. Luania Gomez Gutierrez, 2023. "The Value Relevance of Repetitive Information—Is the Expected Social and Environmental Disclosure Informational?," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 1-1, July.
    6. Wei Yu & Ying Zheng, 2020. "The disclosure of corporate social responsibility reports and sales performance in China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(2), pages 1239-1270, June.
    7. Shan Xu & Duchi Liu, 2018. "Do Financial Markets Care about Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure? Further Evidence from China," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(1), pages 79-103, March.
    8. Zuo, Jian & Zillante, George & Wilson, Lou & Davidson, Kathryn & Pullen, Stephen, 2012. "Sustainability policy of construction contractors: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 3910-3916.
    9. Han, Wu & Zhuangxiong, Yu & Jie, Li, 2018. "Corporate social responsibility, product market competition, and product market performance," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 75-91.
    10. Kathleen Herbohn & Julie Walker & Huay Yien Monica Loo, 2014. "Corporate Social Responsibility: The Link Between Sustainability Disclosure and Sustainability Performance," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 50(4), pages 422-459, December.
    11. Hooks, Jill & van Staden, Chris J., 2011. "Evaluating environmental disclosures: The relationship between quality and extent measures," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 200-213.
    12. Nazim Hussain & Ugo Rigoni & René P. Orij, 2018. "Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 411-432, May.
    13. Li‐Chun Kuo & Chia‐Lin Lee & Yun‐Ting Lee, 2022. "The impact of voluntary assurance of CSR reports on firms' operating performance: Evidence from Taiwan," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 4041-4054, December.
    14. Debidutta Pattnaik & Satish Kumar & Bruce Burton, 2021. "Thirty Years of The Australian Accounting Review: A Bibliometric Analysis," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(2), pages 150-164, June.
    15. Keysa Manuela Cunha de Mascena & Adalberto Americo Fischmann & João Maurício Gama Boaventura, 2018. "Stakeholder Prioritization in Brazilian Companies Disclosing GRI Reports," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 15(1), pages 17-32, January.
    16. Fernando Gómez-Bezares & Wojciech Przychodzen & Justyna Przychodzen, 2016. "Corporate Sustainability and Shareholder Wealth—Evidence from British Companies and Lessons from the Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Razvan HOINARU & Daniel BUDA & Jonel SUBIC & Adela JANSEN, 2023. "Financial and Non-Financial Disclosures for Agriculture: is there any Connection in between GRI 13 and IAS 41?," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(2), pages 158-172, May.
    18. Carmelo Reverte, 2016. "Corporate social responsibility disclosure and market valuation: evidence from Spanish listed firms," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 411-435, March.
    19. Maria del Mar Miralles‐Quiros & Jose Luis Miralles‐Quiros & Irene Guia Arraiano, 2017. "Are Firms that Contribute to Sustainable Development Valued by Investors?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1), pages 71-84, January.
    20. Max Goettsche & Tobias Steindl & Simon Gietl, 2016. "Do Customers Affect the Value Relevance of Sustainability Reporting? Empirical Evidence on Stakeholder Interdependence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 149-164, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    corporate governance; decent work; non-financial reporting; GRI 400 standard; reporting quality; sustainable development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J81 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - Working Conditions
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:34-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.