IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/upravl/v12y2021i5p2-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the state programmes management model in the Russian Federation

Author

Listed:
  • Georgy A. Borshchevskiy

    (The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The research compares the new model of state programmes management in the Russian Federation with the previous one, identifies its advantages and disadvantages and attempts to forecast the avenues for further transformation of programme planning. Methodologically, the study rests on the theories of economic regulation and public administration. The research methods are comparative economic-legal, factor and system analysis, economic and statistical methods for studying time series. The paper analyses the dynamics of statistical indicators used to assess the RF state programmes’ effectiveness amid the key events in the development of programme planning in 2013–2020. The current state programmes regulations are tested for compliance with the basic theories of economic regulation (neoinstitutional, neo-Keynesian, neo-monetary) and public administration (Weberian, New Public Management, Good Governance). The study reveals the unfulfilled potential of state programmes management which necessitated a new model to be developed. The author proves that economically the model equally gravitates towards the neoinstitutional and neo-Keynesian paradigms, and managerially – towards the Weberian and managerial ones. The model’s major advantages are orientation to achieving national development goals; a connection with the budgetary process and the ability to plan expenditures for a period longer than one budget cycle; and the emphasis on the integration between information systems and e-data exchange. At the same time, only half of the recommendations formulated after past programmes evaluation were reflected in the new regulation. Programme planning remains a bureaucratic way of budget expenditures with costs inherent in it. Focusing on the paradigm that best reflects strategic priorities will enhance the effectiveness of the programme management model.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgy A. Borshchevskiy, 2021. "Assessment of the state programmes management model in the Russian Federation," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(5), pages 2-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:12:y:2021:i:5:p:2-20
    DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-5-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://upravlenets.usue.ru/images/93/1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://upravlenets.usue.ru/en/issues-2021/873
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-5-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniela Pasnicu & Gabriela Tudose, 2017. "Methodological Framework for ex-ante Assessment of Active Policies on the Labor Market - Experimental Approach," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 6(1), pages 30-39, March.
    2. Abel Gezevich Aganbegyan, 2019. "Development of the Far East: A National Program in the Context of National Projects," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 3, pages 165-181.
    3. Vladimir Komarov & Varvara Akimova & Vladimir Kotsyubinskiy & Stepan Zemtsov, 2021. "Comparative Analysis Of The Development Approaches To Long-Term Government Strategies In Russia And In The World," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 1, pages 56-74.
    4. Jordi Galí, 2018. "The State of New Keynesian Economics: A Partial Assessment," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 32(3), pages 87-112, Summer.
    5. Eichenbaum, Martin & Rebelo, Sérgio & Trabandt, Mathias, 2022. "Epidemics in the Neoclassical and New-Keynesian Models," CEPR Discussion Papers 14903, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Tikhomirov, Boris I. (Тихомиров, Борис) & Frenkel, Alexander A. (Френкель, Александр), 2017. "On Unified Socio-Economic Policy and Strategic Planning [О Единой Социально-Экономической Политике И Стратегическом Планировании]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 4, pages 82-117, August.
    7. V. L. Tambovtsev, 2021. "Is unified institutional economics possible?," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 1.
    8. Michael Choi & Guillaume Rocheteau, 2021. "New Monetarism in Continuous Time: Methods and Applications," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(634), pages 658-696.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert M. Rosenswig, 2024. "Understanding money; Or, why social and financial accounting should not be conflated," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(1), pages 71-86, January.
    2. Cesar Salinas, 2021. "Epidemics and Informality in Developing Countries," CAEPR Working Papers 2021-002 Classification-E, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
    3. Jason Lennard & Finn Meinecke & Solomos Solomou, 2023. "Measuring inflation expectations in interwar Britain," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 76(3), pages 844-870, August.
    4. Anna Bartocci & Alessandro Notarpietro & Massimiliano Pisani, 2022. "Covid-19 Shock and Fiscal-Monetary Policy Mix in a Monetary Union," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Luigi Paganetto (ed.), Economic Challenges for Europe After the Pandemic, pages 233-266, Springer.
    5. Raza, Hamid & Laurentjoye, Thibault & Byrialsen, Mikael Randrup & Valdecantos, Sebastian, 2023. "Inflation and the role of macroeconomic policies: A model for the case of Denmark," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 32-43.
    6. Goryunov, Alexander & Ageshina, Elena & Lavrentev, Igor & Peretyatko, Polina, 2023. "Estimating the effect of Russia’s development policy in the Far Eastern region: The synthetic control approach," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 72, pages 58-72.
    7. Jaccard, Ivan, 2022. "The trade-off between public health and the economy in the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic," Working Paper Series 2690, European Central Bank.
    8. Zachary Bethune & Guillaume Rocheteau & Tsz-Nga Wong & Cathy Zhang, 2022. "Lending Relationships and Optimal Monetary Policy," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 89(4), pages 1833-1872.
    9. Ray C. Fair, 2019. "Some Important Macro Points," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2165R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Jul 2019.
    10. Acurio Vásconez, Verónica & Damette, Olivier & Shanafelt, David W., 2023. "Macroepidemics and unconventional monetary policy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    11. Azariadis, Costas & Bullard, James & Singh, Aarti & Suda, Jacek, 2019. "Incomplete credit markets and monetary policy," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 83-101.
    12. Shah, Sayar Ahmad & Garg, Bhavesh, 2023. "Testing policy effectiveness during COVID-19: An NK-DSGE analysis," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. Davide Debortoli & Jordi Galí, 2024. "Heterogeneity and Aggregate Fluctuations: Insights from TANK Models," NBER Chapters, in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2024, volume 39, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Antonio Rodriguez‐Lopez, 2021. "Liquidity and the International Allocation of Economic Activity," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 62(2), pages 789-830, May.
    15. Willem Thorbecke, 2020. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the U.S. Economy: Evidence from the Stock Market," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-30, October.
    16. Rocheteau, Guillaume & Wang, Lu, 2023. "Endogenous liquidity and volatility," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    17. В. Tikhomirov I. & Б. Тихомиров И., 2019. "Цифровизация социально-экономического развития: тернистый путь к новому качеству информационного общества // Digital Transformations of Socio-economic Development: a Thorny Path to a New Quality Infor," Экономика. Налоги. Право // Economics, taxes & law, ФГОБУ "Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации" // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 12(4), pages 20-28.
    18. Jacek Rothert, 2021. "Optimal federal transfers during uncoordinated response to a pandemic," GRAPE Working Papers 58, GRAPE Group for Research in Applied Economics.
    19. Assa Cohen & Mahyar Kargar & Benjamin Lester & Pierre-Olivier Weill, 2024. "Inventory, Market Making, and Liquidity in OTC Markets," Working Papers 24-22, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    20. Luisa Corrado & Stefano Grassi & Aldo Paolillo, 2021. "Modelling and Estimating Large Macroeconomic Shocks During the Pandemic," CREATES Research Papers 2021-08, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    state governance; public administration; programme planning; state programme; programme management; programme assessment; programme assessment methodology;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C6 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling
    • H53 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
    • O21 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Planning Models; Planning Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:upravl:v:12:y:2021:i:5:p:2-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.