IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/izvest/v20y2019i1p78-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valuation of higher education institution’s intellectual capital: The issue of methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Pavel A. Novgorodov

    (Novosibirsk state University of Economics and management "NINH" (NSUEM))

Abstract

The paper aims to ground the directions for developing a methodology for valuation of higher education institutions and their intellectual capital. Assessment of investments’ efficiency in this sphere encounters significant difficulties primarily due to non-commercial nature and a wide spectrum of heterogeneous results of higher education institutions’ activities. The author proves that the results delivered by universities’ intellectual capital can be measured and expressed in monetary terms. The development of a methodology for valuation of universities and their intellectual capital allows comparing expenditures and universities’ performance in the form of their intellectual capital increase and clarify the principles of financing higher education institutions from the state budget. The research methodology includes existing methods for measuring intellectual capital, including the group of methods within revenue-based, costbased and comparative approaches. The researcher looks at the possibilities and limitations of Development of Industrial Markets and Enterprises applying existing approaches and methods for valuation of universities, their intellectual capital and its particular elements. The conclusion is made that value-based methods can be applied to the measurement of higher education institutions’ intellectual capital. The author reasons the directions for their modification to ensure correct valuation of universities and their intellectual capital for the purposes of financing and developing the higher education system as a whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Pavel A. Novgorodov, 2019. "Valuation of higher education institution’s intellectual capital: The issue of methodology," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 20(1), pages 78-94, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:url:izvest:v:20:y:2019:i:1:p:78-94
    DOI: 10.29141/2073-1019-2019-20-1-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jne.usue.ru/images/download/81/6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://jne.usue.ru/en/issues-2019/786
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2073-1019-2019-20-1-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Przemysław Dominiak & Jacek Mercik & Agata Szymańska, 2013. "Comparative analysis of methods of measuring a company's intellectual capital," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 23(1), pages 17-28.
    2. Strack, Rainer & Villis, Ulrich, 2002. "RAVE(TM):: Integrated Value Management for Customer, Human, Supplier and Invested Capital," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 147-158, April.
    3. Yolanda Ramírez & à ngel Tejada & Silvia Gordillo, 2013. "Recognition of intellectual capital importance in the university sector," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 3(4), pages 27-41, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saqer Sulimas Al-Tahat & Alaa Jaber Matarneh & Osama Abdul Moneim Ali, 2019. "The Impact of the Intellectual Capital of the University Administration in Achieving the Quality of Education," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(2), pages 137-154, February.
    2. Juhi Kamakoty & Sandeep Singh, 2023. "PHEISQUAL: A Scale to Measure Service Quality of Professional Higher Educational Institute From Faculty Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    3. Przemysław Dominiak & Jacek Mercik & Agata Szymańska, 2016. "A synthetic indicator of a company’s level of intellectual capital as a hidden value," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 26(3), pages 5-20.
    4. Friederike Wall & Gernot Mödritscher, 2012. "Integrationsnotwendigkeiten im Controlling bei der Transformation zum Lösungsanbieter," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(65), pages 128-152, January.
    5. Paul Andon & Jane Baxter & Habib Mahama, 2005. "The Balanced Scorecard: Slogans, Seduction, and State of Play," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 15(35), pages 29-38, March.
    6. O. V. Nedoluzhko & K. S. Solodukhin, 2024. "Quantitative Assessment of University’s Intellectual Capital Based on Fuzzy Model," University Management: Practice and Analysis, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and, vol. 28(1).
    7. Zuhair A. Al-Hemyari & Abdullah M. Al-Sarmi, 2018. "Information Management Model for Intellectual Capital of HEIs in Oman: Theoretical Quantitative Approach and Practical Results," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-38, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    higher education institution; intellectual capital; valuation; valuation methods.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • H5 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:izvest:v:20:y:2019:i:1:p:78-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.