IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ura/ecregj/v1y2012i3p125-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional criteria for the assessment of intellectual products` potential realization in the venture financing system

Author

Listed:
  • Tatyana Volkova

    (Institute of Economics)

  • Marina Kuznetsova

    (Institute of Economics)

Abstract

The objective of the research is to elaborate institutional criteria for the assessment of intellectual products` potential realization in the venture financing system which are not presented in the existing works on venture investments. Research methodology is based on synthesis of institutional and new institutional economics theory, theories of innovations, uncertainty and risk, management of innovations. Essential characteristics of venture financing are structured in the paper, its treatment as an economic category is suggested. A number of common institutional criteria for the assessment of intellectual products` potential feasibility in the system of venture financing are outlined and grounded. The structure of institutional field of venture financing (by the example of Sverdlovsk region) is elaborated with consideration of projected development and coevolution of formal and informal institutions as a favorable environment for drawing into economic turnover and commercialization of technological developments and projects. Analytical investigation of structural elements for creation of institutional field of venture financing in Sverdlovsk region is performed, a range of common and specific problems, contradictions and recommendations are outlined. The paper introduces institutional criteria for the assessment of intellectual products` potential feasibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatyana Volkova & Marina Kuznetsova, 2012. "Institutional criteria for the assessment of intellectual products` potential realization in the venture financing system," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 125-133.
    • Handle: RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2012:i:3:p:125-133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economyofregion.ru/Data/Issues/ER2012/September_2012/ERSeptember2012_125_133.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aleksandr Tatarkin & Svetlana Doroshenko, 2011. "Region as a self-developing socio-economic system: crossing the crisis," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 15-23.
    2. Tatyana Volkova, 2006. "Commercialization of intellectual products of the scientific sphere: institutional analysis," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 98-111.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yevgeniy Animitsa, 2012. "Outlines of the theory of urban agglomerations' self-development," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 231-235.
    2. Victoria V. Akberdina & Anatoly V. Grebenkin & Oleg M. Barbakov, 2015. "Modeling Response to Innovations in Industrialized Regions: The Russian Experience," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 5(4), pages 910-921.
    3. Vadim Kabanov & Aleksandr Zhilnikov & Tatiana Zablotskaya, 2018. "Financial Guarantees of the Regional Budget are Growth Potential for the Investments in Fixed Capital," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 315-325.
    4. Vladimir Borodin, 2012. "Increasing the self-development potential of SFO’s regions," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 83-89.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ura:ecregj:v:1:y:2012:i:3:p:125-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Naydenov (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.economyofregion.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.