IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ1/2015-04-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Response to Innovations in Industrialized Regions: The Russian Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Victoria V. Akberdina

    (Department of Regional Industrial Policy and Economic Security, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; chair Theory of Management and Innovation , Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation)

  • Anatoly V. Grebenkin

    (Department of Regional Industrial Policy and Economic Security, Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; chair Theory of Management and Innovation , Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation)

  • Oleg M. Barbakov

    (Chair Business Informatics and Mathematics , Tyumen State Oil and Gas University, Tyumen, Russian Federation.)

Abstract

The objective of the paper is to provide a rationale for mathematical models that describe a response to innovations (response to innovations) across industrialized regions of Russia. The paper gives an advanced analysis of trends in a development of industrialized regions. Based on the mentioned analysis, the authors have put forward and tested a number of hypotheses. There are the hypothesis for an unbalanced economic development in industrialized regions of various types, the hypothesis for development distinction, inherent to industrialized regions of certain types, the hypothesis for a catalytic role of the government in the innovation dynamics and the hypothesis for the available response to innovations in the economic system. The authors have proposed a methodology for the response to innovations, proved conditions, under which the response appears in the economic system, grounded types of the response to innovations. The authors have also presented mathematical formalization for mechanism for the response to innovations in the regional production system. In an action-oriented section of this paper, the authors have explored the response to innovations in industrialized regions of Russia. The findings given in the paper can be used to justify mechanisms of the regional industrial policy, as well as evaluate a regulatory impact of valid regulatory legal acts.

Suggested Citation

  • Victoria V. Akberdina & Anatoly V. Grebenkin & Oleg M. Barbakov, 2015. "Modeling Response to Innovations in Industrialized Regions: The Russian Experience," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 5(4), pages 910-921.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2015-04-10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/download/1443/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/1443/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olga Romanova & Viktoria Akberdina, 2013. "Methodology and practice of development of hi-tech sector of economy and creation new vacancies in the industrial region," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 152-161.
    2. Viktoria Akberdina & Anatoliy Grebenkin, 2009. "Opportunities of economic development of the Sverdlovsk area in the light of technological multistructure," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 47-53.
    3. Aleksandr Tatarkin & Svetlana Doroshenko, 2011. "Region as a self-developing socio-economic system: crossing the crisis," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 15-23.
    4. Karl Aiginger, 2007. "Industrial Policy: A Dying Breed or A Re-emerging Phoenix," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 297-323, December.
    5. O.A. Romanova (econ@uran.ru ) & A.V. Grebenkin(avgrebenkin48@yandex.ru ) & V.V. Akberdina (akb_vic@mail.ru ), 2011. "Impact of innovation dynamics on regional development of an economic system," Journal "Region: Economics and Sociology", Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering of Siberian Branch of RAS, vol. 1.
    6. Tregenna, Fiona, 2011. "Manufacturing Productivity, Deindustrialization, and Reindustrialization," WIDER Working Paper Series 057, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Viktoria Akberdina & Anatoliy Grebenkin, 2009. "Opportunities of economic development of the Sverdlovsk area in the light of technological multistructure," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 39-46.
    8. Fiona Tregenna, 2011. "Manufacturing Productivity, Deindustrialization, and Reindustrialization," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2011-057, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akberdina, V. V. & Grebenkin, A. V. & Bukhvalov, N. Yu., 2015. "Modeling the innovation resonance in industrialized regions," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 1(4), pages 546-562.
    2. Viktoria Akberdina & Anatoliy Grebenkin & Nikolay Bukhvalov, 2015. "Simulation of Innovative Resonance in the Industrial Regions," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(4), pages 289-308.
    3. Szirmai, Adam & Verspagen, Bart, 2015. "Manufacturing and economic growth in developing countries, 1950–2005," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 46-59.
    4. Andre Lorentz & Tommaso Ciarli & Maria Savona & Marco Valente, 2019. "Structural Transformations and Cumulative Causation: Towards an Evolutionary Micro-foundation of the Kaldorian Growth Model," Working Papers of BETA 2019-15, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    5. Armando J. Garcia Pires & José Pedro Pontes, 2021. "(De)Industrialization, Technology and Transportation," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 527-538, July.
    6. Alberto Botta & Antoine Godin & Marco Missaglia, 2016. "Finance, foreign (direct) investment and dutch disease: the case of Colombia," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 33(2), pages 265-289, August.
    7. Erten, Bilge & Leight, Jessica & Tregenna, Fiona, 2019. "Trade liberalization and local labor market adjustment in South Africa," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 448-467.
    8. Ngwinui Belinda Azenui, 2024. "Why is Labor in the SSA LDCs Moving from One Low Productivity Sector to Another?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(1), pages 216-242, February.
    9. Klimczuk-Kochańska, Magdalena & Skarzyński, Michał & Hogeforster, Jürgen, 2015. "Przyszłość edukacji zawodowej. Kierunki reorientacji i nowe obszary aktywności zawodowej nauczycieli zawodu [The Future of Vocational Education: The Directions of Reorientation and New Areas of Pro," MPRA Paper 75390, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Itaman, Richard E. & Awopegba, Oluwafemi E., 2021. "Finance, oil rent and premature deindustrialisation in Nigeria," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 149-161.
    11. Maria Savona, 2021. "Revisiting High Development Theory to Explain Upgrading Prospects in Business Services Global Value Chains," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(2), pages 206-226, April.
    12. van Neuss, Leif, 2018. "Globalization and deindustrialization in advanced countries," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 49-63.
    13. Nebojsa Stojcic & Zoran Aralica, 2017. "Choosing Right from Wrong: Industrial Policy and (De)industrialization in Central and Eastern Europe," Working Papers 1703, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb.
    14. Gisela Di Meglio & Jorge Gallego & Andrés Maroto & Maria Savona, 2015. "Services in Developing Economies: A new chance for catching-up?," SPRU Working Paper Series 2015-32, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    15. Zoran Aralica & Nebojša Stojčić, 2015. "Regional Patterns of Deindustrialization and Prospects for Reindustrialization in South and Central East European Countries," wiiw Balkan Observatory Working Papers 118, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    16. Ghulam Yahya Khan & Salik Mehboob & Lydia Bares Lopez, 2018. "Deindustrialization and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan," Asian Journal of Economic Modelling, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 6(4), pages 462-475, December.
    17. Naudé, Wim, 2019. "Three Varieties of Africa’s Industrial Future," IZA Discussion Papers 12678, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Borsato, Andrea & Lorentz, André, 2023. "The Kaldor–Verdoorn law at the age of robots and AI," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(10).
    19. Di Meglio, Gisela & Gallego, Jorge, 2022. "Disentangling services in developing regions: A test of Kaldor's first and second laws," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 221-229.
    20. Klimczuk, Andrzej, 2014. "Raport Desk Research: Praktyki wsparcia nauczycieli zawodowych zagrożonych bezrobociem [Desk Research Report: Practices of Supporting Teachers Threatened by Unemployment]," MPRA Paper 63886, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Response to Innovations; Industrialized Regions; Functional Industrial Policy; Government Support Measures;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • C33 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2015-04-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.