IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ulp/buopee/v14y2006m07i3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les enjeux du débat sur la direcive service à la lumière des spécificités des services

Author

Listed:
  • Damien Broussolle

    (Institut d’Etudes Politiques, Université de Strasbourg (LaRGE),)

Abstract

La libéralisation du commerce après s’être centrée sur les biens s’intéresse à présent aux services. Au niveau international les négociations de l’Uruguay Round avaient donné lieu à la création d’un accord spécial consacré aux services : l’AGCS (accord général sur le commerce des services) ou GATS en anglais (General Agreement on Trade in services), les négociations ont repris dans le cadre du Doha Round actuel. Dans l’UE, la stratégie de Lisbonne pour une relance du marché unique comporte un volet consacré aux échanges de services, volet qui s’est concrétisé par le projet de directive sur les services, dite Bolkestein. Dans les deux cas l’objectif est de faire disparaître les entraves au commerce des services pour en favoriser le commerce. La démarche engagée aussi bien dans l’UE qu’au niveau international a suscité de nombreuses réticences, elle pose également des problèmes économiques particuliers. En effet les réflexions économiques traditionnelles concernent indifféremment les biens et services, alors que les services connaissent des particularités qui doivent attirer l’attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Damien Broussolle, 2006. "Les enjeux du débat sur la direcive service à la lumière des spécificités des services," Bulletin de l'Observatoire des politiques économiques en Europe, Observatoire des Politiques Économiques en Europe (OPEE), vol. 14(1), pages 9-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ulp:buopee:v:14:y:2006:m:07:i:3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://opee.unistra.fr/Les-enjeux-du-debat-sur-la
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cyrille Schwellnus, 2006. "La directive services : une analyse économique," La Lettre du CEPII, CEPII research center, issue 252.
    2. Peter Hill, 1999. "Tangibles, intangibles and services: a new taxonomy for the classification of output," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 32(2), pages 426-446, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Damien Broussolle, 2006. "The New Approach To International Trade In Services In View Of Services Specificities: Economic And Regulation Issues," Working Papers of LaRGE Research Center 2006-05, Laboratoire de Recherche en Gestion et Economie (LaRGE), Université de Strasbourg.
    2. repec:ulp:buopee:v::y:2006:m:07:i:3 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Michael Peneder, 2003. "Industry Classifications: Aim, Scope and Techniques," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 109-129, March.
    4. Parry, Glenn & Bustinza, Oscar F. & Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran, 2012. "Servitisation and value co-production in the UK music industry: An empirical study of Consumer Attitudes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 320-332.
    5. C. Michael Wernerheim & Christopher A. Sharpe, 2001. "The Potential Bias in Producer Service Employment Estimates: The Case of the Canadian Space Economy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(3), pages 563-591, March.
    6. Fourcroy, Charlotte & Gallouj, Faiz & Decellas, Fabrice, 2012. "Energy consumption in service industries: Challenging the myth of non-materiality," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 155-164.
    7. Harms, Philipp & Shuvalova, Daria, 2020. "Cultural distance and international trade in services: A disaggregate view," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(2).
    8. Álvarez, Inmaculada C. & Barbero, Javier & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Zofío, José L., 2018. "Does Institutional Quality Matter for Trade? Institutional Conditions in a Sectoral Trade Framework," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 72-87.
    9. Djellal, Faridah & Gallouj, FaIz, 2005. "Mapping innovation dynamics in hospitals," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 817-835, August.
    10. Singh, Inderjeet & Lila, Anshu, 2012. "Emerging Structure of Rajasthan Economy in India," MPRA Paper 43522, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 25 Dec 2012.
    11. Castellacci, Fulvio, 2008. "Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6-7), pages 978-994, July.
    12. Leonard I. Nakamura, 2010. "Intangible Assets And National Income Accounting," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 56(s1), pages 135-155, June.
    13. Youngjung Geum & Moon-Soo Kim & Sungjoo Lee, 2017. "Service Technology: Definition and Characteristics Based on a Patent Database," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 147-166, June.
    14. Bruni, Michele, 2022. "Between-Country Global Inequality and Demographic Change," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 56(3), pages 65-85.
    15. Faïz Gallouj & Maria Savona, 2009. "Innovation in services: a review of the debate and a research agenda," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 149-172, April.
    16. Isabelle Rabaud, 2014. "Gains à l'échange de services pour les pays africains : mythe ou réalité ?," Revue française d'économie, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(2), pages 103-142.
    17. Bonatti, Luigi & Felice, Giulia, 2008. "Endogenous growth and changing sectoral composition in advanced economies," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 109-131, June.
    18. Cowan, Robin & Soete, Luc & Tchervonnava, Oxana, 2001. "Knowledge Transfer and the Services Sector in the Context of the New Economy," Research Memorandum 020, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    19. Faïz Gallouj & Céline Merlin-Brogniart & Anne-Catherine Moursli-Provost, 2013. "Public–private partnerships in hospital innovation: what lessons for hospital management?," Chapters, in: Faïz Gallouj & Luis Rubalcaba & Paul Windrum (ed.), Public–Private Innovation Networks in Services, chapter 11, pages 265-302, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. W. Erwin Diewert, 2001. "Which (Old) Ideas on Productivity Measurement Are Ready to Use?," NBER Chapters, in: New Developments in Productivity Analysis, pages 85-102, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    21. Robert J. Hill, 2018. "Peter Hill (1929‐2017): In Memoriam," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 64(1), pages 239-242, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulp:buopee:v:14:y:2006:m:07:i:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/opstrfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.