IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uii/journl/v5y2013i2p99-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Infrastructure, economic growth and inequality in Indonesia land borders

Author

Listed:
  • Bayu Agung Prasetyo
  • Dominicus Savio Priyarsono
  • Sri Mulatsih

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Bogor Agricultural University
    Faculty of Economics and Management, Bogor Agricultural University
    Faculty of Economics and Management, Bogor Agricultural University)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the impacts of infrastructure on economic growth and inequality in Indonesia land borders. Using static panel data regression and panel two stage least square (2SLS) estimation methods, this study shows that social infrastructure can raise per capita income. The social infrastructures being discussed are number of high schools and number of health facilities. Telecommunication facility can also raise per capita income. In addition, income inequality is found to be positively influenced by income per capita growth and industry sector laborer. It also suggests that infrastructure has indirect relation with income inequality through per capita income.

Suggested Citation

  • Bayu Agung Prasetyo & Dominicus Savio Priyarsono & Sri Mulatsih, 2013. "Infrastructure, economic growth and inequality in Indonesia land borders," Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 5(2), pages 99-108, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:uii:journl:v:5:y:2013:i:2:p:99-108
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol5.iss2.art3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.uii.ac.id/JEP/article/download/3518/3111
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journal.uii.ac.id/JEP/article/view/3518/3111
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://dx.doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol5.iss2.art3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. César Calderón & Alberto Chong, 2004. "Volume and Quality of Infrastructure and the Distribution of Income: An Empirical Investigation," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 50(1), pages 87-106, March.
    2. Jan, Sajjad Ahmad & Chani, Muhammad Irfan & Pervaiz, Zahid & Chaudhary, Amatul R., 2012. "Physical infrastructure and economic development in Pakistan," MPRA Paper 37785, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Balazs Egert & Tomasz Kozluk & Douglas Sutherland, 2009. "Infrastructure and Growth: Empirical Evidence," CESifo Working Paper Series 2700, CESifo.
    4. Dulani Seneviratne & Ms. Yan M Sun, 2013. "Infrastructure and Income Distribution in ASEAN-5: What are the Links?," IMF Working Papers 2013/041, International Monetary Fund.
    5. Sahoo, Pravakar & Dash, Ranjan Kumar & Nataraj, Geethanjali, 2010. "Infrastructure development and economic growth in China," IDE Discussion Papers 261, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    6. Groote, Peter & Jacobs, Jan & Sturm, Jan-Egbert, 1999. "Infrastructure and economic development in the Netherlands, 1853–1913," European Review of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 233-251, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sorin-Iulian Cioacă & Silvia-Elena Cristache & Mariana Vuță & Erika Marin & Mihai Vuță, 2020. "Assessing the Impact of ICT Sector on Sustainable Development in the European Union: An Empirical Analysis Using Panel Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Sarastri Mumpuni Ruchba & Ferdy Suhada, 2015. "The impact of regional autonomy and monetary crisis on economic growth in Yogyakarta," Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 7(1), pages 60-68, April.
    3. Muhammad Hidayat & Ranti Darwin & M. Fikry Hadi, 2020. "Does Energy Infrastructure Reduce Inequality Inter-regional in Riau Province, Indonesia?," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(1), pages 160-164.
    4. Amien Makmuri, 2017. "Infrastructure and inequality: An empirical evidence from Indonesia," Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 9(1), pages 29-39, April.
    5. Ernawati Ernawati & Tajuddin Tajuddin & Syamsir Nur, 2021. "Does Government Expenditure Affect Regional Inclusive Growth? An Experience of Implementing Village Fund Policy in Indonesia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-12, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhenxiong Huang & Hangtian Xu & Jianming Li & Nengsheng Luo, 2020. "Has highway construction narrowed the urban–rural income gap? Evidence from Chinese cities," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(3), pages 705-723, June.
    2. Huang, Ruting & Yao, Xin, 2023. "The role of power transmission infrastructure in income inequality: Fresh evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    3. Mohamed Traoré, 2018. "Government spending and inclusive growth in sub-Saharan Africa: A panel VAR analysis," Working Papers hal-01940506, HAL.
    4. Medeiros, Victor & Ribeiro, Rafael Saulo Marques, 2020. "Power infrastructure and income inequality: Evidence from Brazilian state-level data using dynamic panel data models," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    5. Mohamed Traoré, 2018. "Government spending and inclusive growth in sub-Saharan Africa: A panel VAR analysis," CERDI Working papers hal-01940506, HAL.
    6. Bajar, Sumedha. & Rajeev, Meenakshi., 2015. "The impact of infrastructure provisioning on inequality : evidence from India," ILO Working Papers 994882713402676, International Labour Organization.
    7. Getachew, Yoseph Y. & Turnovsky, Stephen J., 2015. "Productive government spending and its consequences for the growth–inequality tradeoff," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 621-640.
    8. Victor Medeiros & Rafael Saulo Marques Ribeiro & Pedro Vasconcelos Maia do Amaral, 2019. "Infrastructure and income inequality: an application to the brazilian case using hierarchical spatial autoregressive models," Textos para Discussão Cedeplar-UFMG 608, Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
    9. Calderon, Cesar & Serven, Luis, 2014. "Infrastructure, growth, and inequality : an overview," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7034, The World Bank.
    10. repec:ilo:ilowps:488271 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Timilsina,Govinda R. & Hochman,Gal & Song,Ze, 2020. "Infrastructure, Economic Growth, and Poverty : A Review," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9258, The World Bank.
    12. Jose Cuesta & Mario Negre & Ana Revenga & Maika Schmidt, 2018. "Tackling Income Inequality: What Works and Why?," Journal of Income Distribution, Ad libros publications inc., vol. 26(1), pages 1-48, March.
    13. Florian Morvillier, 2020. "Infrastructures and the real exchange rate," EconomiX Working Papers 2020-26, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    14. Muhammad Hidayat & Ranti Darwin & M. Fikry Hadi, 2020. "Does Energy Infrastructure Reduce Inequality Inter-regional in Riau Province, Indonesia?," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(1), pages 160-164.
    15. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Hoang, Thi Hong Van & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar & Roubaud, David, 2017. "Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: New evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 199-212.
    16. Rui Manuel Pereira, Alfredo Marvao Pereira and William J. Hausman, 2017. "Railroad Infrastructure Investments and Economic Development in the Antebellum United States," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 42(3), pages 1-16, September.
    17. BADALYAN, Gohar & HERZFELD, Thomas & RAJCANIOVA, Miroslava, 2014. "Transport Infrastructure And Economic Growth: Panel Data Approach For Armenia, Georgia And Turkey," Review of Agricultural and Applied Economics (RAAE), Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak Agricultural University in Nitra, vol. 17(2), pages 1-10, October.
    18. Garikai Makuyana & Nicholas M. Odhiambo, 2019. "Public and private investment and economic growth in Malawi: an ARDL-bounds testing approach," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 673-689, January.
    19. Simplice Asongu & Ndemaze Asongu, 2018. "The comparative exploration of mobile money services in inclusive development," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 45(1), pages 124-139, January.
    20. Leopoldo Laborda & Daniel Sotelsek, 2019. "Effects of Road Infrastructure on Employment, Productivity and Growth: An Empirical Analysis at Country Level," Journal of Infrastructure Development, India Development Foundation, vol. 11(1-2), pages 81-120, June.
    21. Hans Pitlik & Michael Klien & Stefan Schiman, 2017. "Stabilitätskonforme Berücksichtigung nachhaltiger öffentlicher Investitionen," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 60595.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Land borders; infrastructure; economic growth; inequality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • C36 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation
    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
    • O40 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - General
    • O53 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Asia including Middle East
    • I30 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uii:journl:v:5:y:2013:i:2:p:99-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Yuliani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.uii.ac.id/JEP/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.