IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tpr/restat/v90y2008i4p754-764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nursing Home Quality as a Common Good

Author

Listed:
  • David C. Grabowski

    (Harvard University)

  • Jonathan Gruber

    (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

  • Joseph J. Angelelli

    (Paraprofessional Healthcare Institute)

Abstract

A long-standing assumption among economists is that nursing home quality is common across Medicaid and private-pay patients within a shared facility. However, there has been only limited empirical work addressing this issue. Using a unique individual-level panel of residents of nursing homes from seven states, we exploit both within-facility and within-person variation in payer source and quality to examine this issue. We also test the robustness of these results across states with different Medicaid and private-pay rate differentials. Across various identification strategies, our results are consistent with the assumption of common quality across Medicaid and private-paying patients within facilities. Copyright by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Suggested Citation

  • David C. Grabowski & Jonathan Gruber & Joseph J. Angelelli, 2008. "Nursing Home Quality as a Common Good," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 90(4), pages 754-764, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:90:y:2008:i:4:p:754-764
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/rest.90.4.754
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Sean Shenghsiu & Hirth, Richard A., 2016. "Quality rating and private-prices: Evidence from the nursing home industry," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 59-70.
    2. Andrew T. Ching & Fumiko Hayashi & Hui Wang, 2015. "Quantifying The Impacts Of Limited Supply: The Case Of Nursing Homes," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56(4), pages 1291-1322, November.
    3. Martin B. Hackmann & R. Vincent Pohl & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2024. "Patient versus Provider Incentives in Long-Term Care," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 16(3), pages 178-218, July.
    4. Rahman, Momotazur & Norton, Edward C. & Grabowski, David C., 2016. "Do hospital-owned skilled nursing facilities provide better post-acute care quality?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 36-46.
    5. Craig Garthwaite & Christopher Ody & Amanda Starc, 2020. "Endogenous Quality Investments in the U.S. Hospital Market," NBER Working Papers 27440, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Garthwaite, Craig & Ody, Christopher & Starc, Amanda, 2022. "Endogenous quality investments in the U.S. hospital market," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    7. Karmann, Alexander & Sugawara, Shinya, 2022. "Comparing the German and Japanese nursing home sectors: Implications of demographic and policy differences," CEPIE Working Papers 02/22, Technische Universität Dresden, Center of Public and International Economics (CEPIE).
    8. Martin B. Hackmann, 2019. "Incentivizing Better Quality of Care: The Role of Medicaid and Competition in the Nursing Home Industry," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(5), pages 1684-1716, May.
    9. Thomas Buchmueller & John C. Ham & Lara D. Shore-Sheppard, 2015. "The Medicaid Program," NBER Chapters, in: Economics of Means-Tested Transfer Programs in the United States, Volume 1, pages 21-136, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. John R. Bowblis & Austin C. Smith, 2021. "Occupational Licensing of Social Services and Nursing Home Quality: A Regression Discontinuity Approach," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 74(1), pages 199-223, January.
    11. Haizhen Lin, 2015. "Quality Choice And Market Structure: A Dynamic Analysis Of Nursing Home Oligopolies," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56(4), pages 1261-1290, November.
    12. Nishimura, Y.; Oikawa, M.;, 2017. "Effects of Informal Elderly Care on Labor Supply: Exploitation of Government Intervention on the Supply Side of Elderly Care Market," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 17/02, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    13. Susan Feng Lu & Konstantinos Serfes & Gerard Wedig & Bingxiao Wu, 2021. "Does Competition Improve Service Quality? The Case of Nursing Homes Where Public and Private Payers Coexist," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6493-6512, October.
    14. Ginger Zhe Jin & Ajin Lee & Susan Feng Lu, 2022. "Patient Routing to Skilled Nursing Facilities: The Consequences of the Medicare Reimbursement Rule," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(12), pages 8722-8740, December.
    15. Aaron J. Sojourner & Brigham R. Frandsen & Robert J. Town & David C. Grabowski & Min M. Chen, 2015. "Impacts of Unionization on Quality and Productivity," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 68(4), pages 771-806, August.
    16. Dean D Akinleye & Louise-Anne McNutt & Victoria Lazariu & Colleen C McLaughlin, 2019. "Correlation between hospital finances and quality and safety of patient care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, August.
    17. Susan F. Lu & Huaxia Rui & Abraham Seidmann, 2018. "Does Technology Substitute for Nurses? Staffing Decisions in Nursing Homes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(4), pages 1842-1859, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tpr:restat:v:90:y:2008:i:4:p:754-764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kelly McDougall (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://direct.mit.edu/journals .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.