IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/techni/v4y2022i6p58-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling and fault detection of a turbofan engine by deep-learning approach

Author

Listed:
  • Offole Florence

Abstract

Throughout the world, thousands of passengers travel by air, their quality depends on that of the equipment used. Predictive maintenance is increasingly used to estimate. The remaining useful life of system components and in particular turbofan engines as an essential component. It is used to predict failure before it occurs, optimize component design, extend equipment life, and reduce maintenance costs. However, the algorithms proposed in the literature to date to determine the remaining useful life lack precision with a quadratic error around 20 while the physical models have errors of the order of 0.02. The problem here is how to increase the accuracy of predicting the remaining useful life of a turbofan engine. The objective of this study is to develop a more realistic and accurate algorithm for calculating the remaining useful life of a turbofan engine. To do this, we considered the degradation of the high pressure compressor and the fan as essential organs of the turbojet engine and we used deep learning, known for its high precision linked to a great capacity for extracting information. More specifically, it involved acquiring data on a turbojet engine in operation, pre-processing this data, developing the prediction model, training the model and finally validating the approach in comparison with other diagnostic methods. and to model these defects. We compared two deep learning architectures per application against the CMAPSS dataset to assess their performance. The LSTM architecture we developed prevailed with an RMSE of 13.76, well positioned compared to the literature architecture.

Suggested Citation

  • Offole Florence, 2022. "Modeling and fault detection of a turbofan engine by deep-learning approach," Technium, Technium Science, vol. 4(6), pages 58-83.
  • Handle: RePEc:tec:techni:v:4:y:2022:i:6:p:58-83
    DOI: 10.47577/technium.v4i6.7107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/technium/article/view/7107
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/technium/article/view/7107/2477
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47577/technium.v4i6.7107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Zeqi & Bin Liang, & Wang, Xueqian & Lu, Weining, 2017. "Remaining useful life prediction of aircraft engine based on degradation pattern learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 74-83.
    2. Liliane Pintelon & Alejandro Parodi-Herz, 2008. "Maintenance: An Evolutionary Perspective," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Complex System Maintenance Handbook, chapter 2, pages 21-48, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Xiang & Ding, Qian & Sun, Jian-Qiao, 2018. "Remaining useful life estimation in prognostics using deep convolution neural networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1-11.
    2. Hamzeh Soltanali & Mehdi Khojastehpour & Siamak Kheybari, 2023. "Evaluating the critical success factors for maintenance management in agro-industries using multi-criteria decision-making techniques," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 949-968, June.
    3. Zhuang, Jichao & Jia, Minping & Ding, Yifei & Ding, Peng, 2021. "Temporal convolution-based transferable cross-domain adaptation approach for remaining useful life estimation under variable failure behaviors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    4. Costa, Nahuel & Sánchez, Luciano, 2022. "Variational encoding approach for interpretable assessment of remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    5. Bo, Yimin & Bao, Minglei & Ding, Yi & Hu, Yishuang, 2024. "A DNN-based reliability evaluation method for multi-state series-parallel systems considering semi-Markov process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    6. Bae, Jinwoo & Xi, Zhimin, 2022. "Learning of physical health timestep using the LSTM network for remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    7. J.P. Sprong & X. Jiang & H. Polinder, 2020. "Deployment of Prognostics to Optimize Aircraft Maintenance – A Literature Review," Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 5(4), pages 26-37, May.
    8. Xu, Zhaoyi & Saleh, Joseph Homer, 2021. "Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    9. Youdao Wang & Yifan Zhao, 2022. "Multi-Scale Remaining Useful Life Prediction Using Long Short-Term Memory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Zhang, Wei & Li, Xiang & Ma, Hui & Luo, Zhong & Li, Xu, 2021. "Transfer learning using deep representation regularization in remaining useful life prediction across operating conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    11. Cao, Yudong & Ding, Yifei & Jia, Minping & Tian, Rushuai, 2021. "A novel temporal convolutional network with residual self-attention mechanism for remaining useful life prediction of rolling bearings," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    12. Feng, Tingting & Li, Shichao & Guo, Liang & Gao, Hongli & Chen, Tao & Yu, Yaoxiang, 2023. "A degradation-shock dependent competing failure processes based method for remaining useful life prediction of drill bit considering time-shifting sudden failure threshold," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    13. Goossens, Adriaan J.M. & Basten, Rob J.I., 2015. "Exploring maintenance policy selection using the Analytic Hierarchy Process; An application for naval ships," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 31-41.
    14. Xiang, Sheng & Qin, Yi & Liu, Fuqiang & Gryllias, Konstantinos, 2022. "Automatic multi-differential deep learning and its application to machine remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    15. Li, Xiang & Zhang, Wei & Ding, Qian, 2019. "Deep learning-based remaining useful life estimation of bearings using multi-scale feature extraction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 208-218.
    16. Francesco Corman & Sander Kraijema & Milinko Godjevac & Gabriel Lodewijks, 2017. "Optimizing preventive maintenance policy: A data-driven application for a light rail braking system," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(5), pages 534-545, October.
    17. Yuanju Qu & Zengtao Hou, 2022. "Degradation principle of machines influenced by maintenance," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 1521-1530, June.
    18. González-Muñiz, Ana & Díaz, Ignacio & Cuadrado, Abel A. & García-Pérez, Diego, 2022. "Health indicator for machine condition monitoring built in the latent space of a deep autoencoder," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    19. Chen, Zhen & Li, Yaping & Xia, Tangbin & Pan, Ershun, 2019. "Hidden Markov model with auto-correlated observations for remaining useful life prediction and optimal maintenance policy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 123-136.
    20. Yan, Tao & Lei, Yaguo & Li, Naipeng & Wang, Biao & Wang, Wenting, 2021. "Degradation modeling and remaining useful life prediction for dependent competing failure processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:techni:v:4:y:2022:i:6:p:58-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Maria Golita (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.