IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v26y2021i1p514-526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Therapeutic robots as a technological intervention in residential environments for older adults: Uses, limitations and ethical concerns

Author

Listed:
  • Rosa Redolat

    (Department of Psychobiology, Faculty of Psychology and Logopedy, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain,)

  • Mercedes Fernandez-Rios

    (Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Logopedy, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

The use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) is one of the innovative responses to the high prevalence of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative disorders. A more holistic approach to the field of gerontology is being adopted, including robotics as an expanding field in the care of the elderly. Our main aim is to review how new technologies can provide opportunities for sensory stimulation and social participation for older adults. We also discuss the transformation of the models of care (from more traditional medical models to person-centered care models) reviewing the use of social robots as a valuable tool in interventions in different residential environments. Robotic technology aimed at the support and care for older adults has shown benefits in areas such as communication, social interaction and quality of life. The review of recent literature also suggests that the use of social robots presents some limitations (robots should be designed to meet the real needs of patients and we need to take into account their impact on health and environment) and ethical concerns (data protection or fear that robots will end up replacing contact among humans) that must be considered when applying these new technologies. It is concluded that social robots can be considered as promising tools for use in people with AD, both from the perspective of the patients and their caregivers, offering cost-effective solutions. New technologies should not aim to replace humans but rather could be a complementary tool for the management and provision of care.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosa Redolat & Mercedes Fernandez-Rios, 2021. "Therapeutic robots as a technological intervention in residential environments for older adults: Uses, limitations and ethical concerns," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 26(1), pages 514-526, Decembrie.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:26:y:2021:i:1:p:514-526
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/5114/1900
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/5114
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khaksar, Seyed Mohammad Sadegh & Khosla, Rajiv & Chu, Mei Tai & Shahmehr, Fatemeh S., 2016. "Service Innovation Using Social Robot to Reduce Social Vulnerability among Older People in Residential Care Facilities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 113(PB), pages 438-453.
    2. Hod Lipson, 2019. "Robots on the run," Nature, Nature, vol. 568(7751), pages 174-175, April.
    3. Benedicte S Strøm & Siri Ytrehus & Ellen‐Karine Grov, 2016. "Sensory stimulation for persons with dementia: a review of the literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(13-14), pages 1805-1834, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arsenyan, Jbid & Mirowska, Agata & Piepenbrink, Anke, 2023. "Close encounters with the virtual kind: Defining a human-virtual agent coexistence framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Chiang, Ai-Hsuan & Trimi, Silvana & Lo, Yu-Ju, 2022. "Emotion and service quality of anthropomorphic robots," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    3. Ding, Bin & Li, Yameng & Miah, Shah & Liu, Wei, 2024. "Customer acceptance of frontline social robots—Human-robot interaction as boundary condition," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    4. Yao, Qi & Hu, Chao & Zhou, Wenkai, 2024. "The impact of customer privacy concerns on service robot adoption intentions: A credence/experience service typology perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    5. Luca M. Possati, 2020. "Algorithmic unconscious: why psychoanalysis helps in understanding AI," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Toms, G. & Verity, F. & Orrell, A., 2019. "Social care technologies for older people: Evidence for instigating a broader and more inclusive dialogue," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    7. Kim, Rachel H. & Gaukler, Gary M. & Lee, Chang Won, 2016. "Improving healthcare quality: A technological and managerial innovation perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 113(PB), pages 373-378.
    8. Skare, Marinko & Porada-Rochoń, Małgorzata, 2022. "Technology and social equality in the United States," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    9. Tan, Si Ying & Taeihagh, Araz & Tripathi, Abhas, 2021. "Tensions and antagonistic interactions of risks and ethics of using robotics and autonomous systems in long-term care," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    10. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & A. Sharma & Nripendra P. Rana & M. Giannakis & P. Goel & Vincent Dutot, 2023. "Evolution of Artificial Intelligence Research in Technological Forecasting and Social Change: Research Topics, Trends, and Future Directions," Post-Print hal-04292607, HAL.
    11. Frank, Darius-Aurel & Otterbring, Tobias, 2023. "Being seen… by human or machine? Acknowledgment effects on customer responses differ between human and robotic service workers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    12. Clarissa Giebel & Bram de Boer & Mark Gabbay & Caroline Watkins & Neil Wilson & Hilary Tetlow & Hilde Verbeek, 2022. "Developing a Meaningful Garden Space in a Care Home with Staff and Family Members: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-11, June.
    13. Pei-Yao Su & Zi-Ying Zhao & Qi-Gan Shao & Pei-Yuan Lin & Zhe Li, 2023. "The Construction of an Evaluation Index System for Assistive Teaching Robots Aimed at Sustainable Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-24, September.
    14. Baudier, Patricia & de Boissieu, Elodie & Duchemin, Marie-Hélène, 2023. "Source Credibility and Emotions generated by Robot and Human Influencers: The perception of luxury brand representatives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    15. Borghi, Matteo & Mariani, Marcello M., 2022. "The role of emotions in the consumer meaning-making of interactions with social robots," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    16. Wilson-Nash, Carolyn & Pavlopoulou, Ismini & McCabe, Louise & Gibson, Grant, 2024. "Towards an evaluation framework for inclusive technological innovation in social and health care services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    17. Xiaoyi Jin & Yanjun Liu & Zhaoyuan Hu & Wei Du, 2021. "Vulnerable Older Adults’ Identification, Geographic Distribution, and Policy Implications in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-19, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    aged; Alzheimer disease; technology; caregiver; robotics; dementia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:26:y:2021:i:1:p:514-526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.