IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v179y2024ics014829632400208x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards an evaluation framework for inclusive technological innovation in social and health care services

Author

Listed:
  • Wilson-Nash, Carolyn
  • Pavlopoulou, Ismini
  • McCabe, Louise
  • Gibson, Grant

Abstract

With the COVID-19 pandemic came an influx of digital technologies introduced into the care home sector. Many care homes were not ready for digital changes, and subsequently, the inclusivity of these innovations was variable. We develop a holistic evaluation framework to assess the inclusivity of service innovations, including the well-being of care home residents and employees. We adopt a mixed methods approach using the ‘non-adoption, abandonment, and challenges to scale-up, spread, and sustainability − complexity assessment toolkit’ (NASSS-CAT) to evaluate the introduction of tablet computers into care homes across Scotland and assess the inclusivity of the innovation. The paper offers a theoretical synthesis by indicating how the seven dimensions of the NASSS-CAT can evaluate the six stages of the ladder of inclusive innovation. Results specify how the care home sector could be more inclusive of its residents and staff by co-creating innovation, developing staff training, and supporting the well-being/activities coordinators.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilson-Nash, Carolyn & Pavlopoulou, Ismini & McCabe, Louise & Gibson, Grant, 2024. "Towards an evaluation framework for inclusive technological innovation in social and health care services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:179:y:2024:i:c:s014829632400208x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632400208X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114704?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andries, Petra & Daou, Alain & Verheyden, Laura, 2019. "Innovation as a vehicle for improving socially vulnerable groups’ access to basic provisions: A research note on the development of a questionnaire module," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 281-288.
    2. Christopher Foster & Richard Heeks, 2013. "Conceptualising Inclusive Innovation: Modifying Systems of Innovation Frameworks to Understand Diffusion of New Technology to Low-Income Consumers," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 25(3), pages 333-355, July.
    3. Khaksar, Seyed Mohammad Sadegh & Khosla, Rajiv & Chu, Mei Tai & Shahmehr, Fatemeh S., 2016. "Service Innovation Using Social Robot to Reduce Social Vulnerability among Older People in Residential Care Facilities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 113(PB), pages 438-453.
    4. Evgeny A Klochikhin, 2012. "Linking Development and Innovation: What Does Technological Change Bring to the Society?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 24(1), pages 41-55, February.
    5. Schneider-Kamp, Anna & Fersch, Barbara, 2021. "Detached co-involvement in interactional care: Transcending temporality and spatiality through mHealth in a social psychiatry out-patient setting," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    6. Gerard George & Anita M. McGahan & Jaideep Prabhu, 2012. "Innovation for Inclusive Growth: Towards a Theoretical Framework and a Research Agenda," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(4), pages 661-683, June.
    7. Woodson, Thomas & Alcantara, Julia Torres & do Nascimento, Milena Silva, 2019. "Is 3D printing an inclusive innovation?: An examination of 3D printing in Brazil," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 80, pages 54-62.
    8. Mortazavi, Sina & Eslami, Mohammad H. & Hajikhani, Arash & Väätänen, Juha, 2021. "Mapping inclusive innovation: A bibliometric study and literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 736-750.
    9. Obayashi, Kazuko & Kodate, Naonori & Masuyama, Shigeru, 2020. "Can connected technologies improve sleep quality and safety of older adults and care-givers? An evaluation study of sleep monitors and communicative robots at a residential care home in Japan," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    10. Campanella, Francesco & Serino, Luana & Mustilli, Mario & Crisci, Anna & D'Ambra, Antonello, 2021. "The evaluation of performance in the European public e-health services sector by Generalized Estimating Equations," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    11. Olga Ustyuzhantseva, 2017. "Studies of inclusive innovation in sociotechnical systems: case studies in Russia and India," Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 83-100, January.
    12. Alexander Seifert & Shelia R Cotten & Bo Xie & Deborah Carr, 2021. "A Double Burden of Exclusion? Digital and Social Exclusion of Older Adults in Times of COVID-19 [Attitudes towards and limitations to ICT use in assisted and independent living communities: Finding," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(3), pages 99-103.
    13. Jepson, Ruth Gillian & Dawson, Alison & McCabe, Louise & Greasley-Adams, Corinne & Biggs, Hannah & Bowes, Alison, 2023. "Development of an intervention programme theory to increase movement in care homes for people with cognitive impairment: Care homes achieving realistic movement strategies (CHARMS)," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    14. Richard Heeks & Christopher Foster & Yanuar Nugroho, 2014. "New models of inclusive innovation for development," Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 175-185, October.
    15. Witell, Lars & Snyder, Hannah & Gustafsson, Anders & Fombelle, Paul & Kristensson, Per, 2016. "Defining service innovation: A review and synthesis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2863-2872.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mario Pansera & Fabien Martinez, 2017. "Innovation for development and poverty reduction: an integrative literature review," Post-Print hal-02887777, HAL.
    2. Yunhui Zhao & Zhimin Wang & Taiwen Feng & Ting Kong & Qiansong Zhang, 2022. "Organizational unlearning and inclusive innovation: The moderating role of green control ambidexterity," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 539-555, August.
    3. Calderini, Mario & Fia, Magali & Gerli, Francesco, 2023. "Organizing for transformative innovation policies: The role of social enterprises. Theoretical insights and evidence from Italy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(7).
    4. Hoffecker, Elizabeth, 2021. "Understanding inclusive innovation processes in agricultural systems: A middle-range conceptual model," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    5. Rafael A. Araque-Padilla & Maria Jose Montero-Simo, 2022. "The Dynamics behind the Likelihood of Adopting Inclusive Agrarian Innovations in Disadvantaged Central American Communities," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Sanghamitra Chakravarty & Georgina Mercedes Gómez, 2024. "A Development Lens to Frugal Innovation: Bringing Back Production and Technological Capabilities into the Discourse," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(1), pages 82-101, February.
    7. Amrita Saha & Tommaso Ciarli, 2018. "Innovation, Structural Change, and Inclusion. A Cross Country PVAR Analysis," SPRU Working Paper Series 2018-01, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    8. Aguirre-Bastos, Carlos & Weber, Matthias K., 2018. "Foresight for shaping national innovation systems in developing economies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 186-196.
    9. Harm-Jan Steenhuis & Xin Fang & Tolga Ulusemre, 2020. "Global Diffusion of Innovation during the Fourth Industrial Revolution: The Case of Additive Manufacturing or 3D Printing," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-34, February.
    10. Marlen Gabriele Arnold, 2017. "Inklusive Wertschöpfung auf BOP Märkten [Inclusive value creation in BOP markets]," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 25-32, June.
    11. Ionica Oncioiu & Florentina Raluca Bîlcan & Anca Gabriela Petrescu, 2017. "The Potential Role of Innovative Indian SMEs in Sustainable Growth," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 1(36), pages 196-206, May.
    12. Woodson, Thomas & Alcantara, Julia Torres & do Nascimento, Milena Silva, 2019. "Is 3D printing an inclusive innovation?: An examination of 3D printing in Brazil," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 80, pages 54-62.
    13. Pansera, Mario & Owen, Richard, 2018. "Framing inclusive innovation within the discourse of development: Insights from case studies in India," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 23-34.
    14. Andersen, Allan Dahl & Andersen, Per Dannemand, 2017. "Foresighting for inclusive development," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 227-236.
    15. Mortazavi, Sina & Eslami, Mohammad H. & Hajikhani, Arash & Väätänen, Juha, 2021. "Mapping inclusive innovation: A bibliometric study and literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 736-750.
    16. Octaviano Rojas Luiz & Enzo Barberio Mariano & Hermes Moretti Ribeiro da Silva, 2021. "Pro-Poor Innovations to Promote Instrumental Freedoms: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    17. Victor Mignenan, 2022. "Management of Frugal Innovation Projects: Research Approach and Perspectives," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(4), pages 121-121, April.
    18. Aarti Krishnan & Chistopher Foster, 2018. "A Quantitative Approach to Innovation in Agricultural Value Chains: Evidence from Kenyan Horticulture," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(1), pages 108-135, January.
    19. Michael D. van der Merwe & Sara S. Grobbelaar & Cornelius S. L. Schutte & Konrad H. von Leipzig, 2018. "Toward an Enterprise Growth Framework for Entering the Base of the Pyramid Market: A Systematic Review," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(04), pages 1-34, August.
    20. Rosca, Eugenia & Agarwal, Nivedita & Brem, Alexander, 2020. "Women entrepreneurs as agents of change: A comparative analysis of social entrepreneurship processes in emerging markets," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:179:y:2024:i:c:s014829632400208x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.