IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/journl/v13y2020i1p376-394.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proposed Method for Supplier Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Agus Ristono

    (Industrial Engineering Department, UPN "Veteran" Yogyakarta, Indonesia)

  • Tri Wahyuningsih

    (Management Department, UPN "Veteran" Yogyakarta, Indonesia)

  • Eko Junianto

    (Post Graduate Student, Industrial Engineering Department, UPN "Veteran" Yogyakarta, Indonesia)

Abstract

The use of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is frequent in supplier selection. First, AHP is a pairwise comparison between criteria. If the pairwise comparisons are inconsistent, the result is invalid. Thus, the process of comparing criteria must be repeated continuously until valid results are obtained. This process takes time and costs so it is considered inefficient. This research proposes the application of the Hamilton chain process into the pairwise comparison matrix. One criterion is symbolized as a knot, while the arc is symbolized as the pairwise comparison value between the two nodes or the connected criterion. In the network model of the AHP method, each node is connected to all other nodes without exception. Whereas in the proposed method, each criterion or node is compared only once. That said, avoiding inconsistencies can be made. The consistency ratio result of the proposed method is found to be consistent.

Suggested Citation

  • Agus Ristono & Tri Wahyuningsih & Eko Junianto, 2020. "Proposed Method for Supplier Selection," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 13(1), pages 376-394, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:376-394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/download/1955/763
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/1955
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gaurav Khatwani & Gopal Das, 2016. "Evaluating combination of individual pre-purchase internet information channels using hybrid fuzzy MCDM technique: demographics as moderators," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 28-49.
    2. Majid Azizi & Nemat Mohebbi & Rahim Mohebbi Gargari & Mohsen Ziaie, 2015. "A strategic model for selecting the location of furniture factories: a case of the study of furniture," International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1/2), pages 87-108.
    3. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    4. Srikanta Routroy & C.V. Sunil Kumar, 2016. "An approach to develop green capability in manufacturing supply chain," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1), pages 1-28.
    5. Saaty, Thomas L., 2006. "Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/network processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 557-570, January.
    6. Seyedmohsen Hosseini & Abdullah Al Khaled, 2019. "A hybrid ensemble and AHP approach for resilient supplier selection," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 207-228, January.
    7. Maria Do Rosário Cabrita & Rita Frade, 2016. "Supplier selection approach: integrating analytic hierarchy process and supplier risk analysis," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2/3/4), pages 238-261.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tri Wahyuningsih, 2022. "The application of factor analysis (FA) in evaluating supplier selection criteria in PT. Wijaya Karya Beton Tbk and ranking suppliers using integration of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and adapti," Technium, Technium Science, vol. 4(6), pages 11-17.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M Tavana & M A Sodenkamp, 2010. "A fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis model for advanced technology assessment at Kennedy Space Center," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(10), pages 1459-1470, October.
    2. Kuei-Hu Chang & Yung-Chia Chang & Kai Chain & Hsiang-Yu Chung, 2016. "Integrating Soft Set Theory and Fuzzy Linguistic Model to Evaluate the Performance of Training Simulation Systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-29, September.
    3. Yu-Yu Ma & Chia-Liang Lin & Hung-Lung Lin, 2023. "Ranking of Service Quality Index and Solutions for Online English Teaching in the Post-COVID-19 Crisis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Fabio De Felice & Laura Petrillo & Luigi Ranieri & Antonella Petrillo, 2019. "Previous Studies and Differences Between Lean Management and World Class Manufacturing," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(06), pages 1941-1966, November.
    5. Chia-Liang Lin & Jwu-Jenq Chen & Yu-Yu Ma, 2023. "Ranking of Service Quality Solution for Blended Design Teaching Using Fuzzy ANP and TOPSIS in the Post-COVID-19 Era," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-28, March.
    6. Hede, Shantesh & Nunes, Manuel Jose Lopes & Ferreira, Paula Fernanda Varandas & Rocha, Luis Alexandre, 2013. "Incorporating sustainability in decision-making for medical device development," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 276-293.
    7. Jian Wan & Chia-Liang Lin, 2023. "Research on the Service Quality Index and Alternatives Evaluation and Ranking for Online Yue Kiln Celadon Art Education in Post COVID-19 Era," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Kamvysi, Konstantina & Gotzamani, Katerina & Andronikidis, Andreas & Georgiou, Andreas C., 2014. "Capturing and prioritizing students’ requirements for course design by embedding Fuzzy-AHP and linear programming in QFD," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 1083-1094.
    9. Saaty, Thomas L. & Shang, Jennifer S., 2011. "An innovative orders-of-magnitude approach to AHP-based mutli-criteria decision making: Prioritizing divergent intangible humane acts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 703-715, November.
    10. Yi Du & Xiaoyan Wang & Daniele Brombal & Angela Moriggi & Andrew Sharpley & Shujiang Pang, 2018. "Changes in Environmental Awareness and Its Connection to Local Environmental Management in Water Conservation Zones: The Case of Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-24, June.
    11. George Panagopoulos & George Bathrellos & Hariklia Skilodimou & Faini Martsouka, 2012. "Mapping Urban Water Demands Using Multi-Criteria Analysis and GIS," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(5), pages 1347-1363, March.
    12. Juan Esquivel & Guillermo Morales & María Esteller, 2015. "Groundwater Monitoring Network Design Using GIS and Multicriteria Analysis," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(9), pages 3175-3194, July.
    13. R. Duncan McIntosh & Austin Becker, 2020. "Applying MCDA to weight indicators of seaport vulnerability to climate and extreme weather impacts for U.S. North Atlantic ports," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 356-370, September.
    14. Flavio Martins & Maria Fatima Almeida & Rodrigo Calili & Agatha Oliveira, 2020. "Design Thinking Applied to Smart Home Projects: A User-Centric and Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, December.
    15. Jochen Wulf, 2020. "Development of an AHP hierarchy for managing omnichannel capabilities: a design science research approach," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 39-68, April.
    16. Wu, Zhangsheng & Li, Yue & Wang, Rong & Xu, Xu & Ren, Dongyang & Huang, Quanzhong & Xiong, Yunwu & Huang, Guanhua, 2023. "Evaluation of irrigation water saving and salinity control practices of maize and sunflower in the upper Yellow River basin with an agro-hydrological model based method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    17. Fatih Yiğit & Şakir Esnaf, 2021. "A new Fuzzy C-Means and AHP-based three-phased approach for multiple criteria ABC inventory classification," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 1517-1528, August.
    18. D’Inverno, Giovanna & Carosi, Laura & Romano, Giulia & Guerrini, Andrea, 2018. "Water pollution in wastewater treatment plants: An efficiency analysis with undesirable output," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 24-34.
    19. Nermin Kişi, 2019. "A Strategic Approach to Sustainable Tourism Development Using the A’WOT Hybrid Method: A Case Study of Zonguldak, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    20. Pathiraja, Erandathie & Griffith, Garry & Farquharson, Robert & Faggia, Rob, 2019. "The Cost of Climate Change to Agricultural Industries: Coconuts in Sri Lanka," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 10(05), December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP); supplier selection; Hamilton chain; criteria;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:journl:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:376-394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tasente Tanase (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.