IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v49y2017i8p753-767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An approach based on robust optimization and decision rules for analyzing real options in engineering systems design

Author

Listed:
  • Aakil M. Caunhye
  • Michel-Alexandre Cardin

Abstract

In this article, a novel approach to analyze flexibility and real options in engineering systems design is proposed based on robust optimization and decision rules. A semi-infinite robust counterpart is formulated for a worst-case non-flexible Generation Expansion Planning (GEP) problem taken as a demonstration application. An exact solution methodology is proven by converting the model into an explicit mixed-integer programming model. Strategic capacity expansion flexibility—also referred to as real options—is analyzed in the GEP problem formulation and a multi-stage finite adaptability decision rule is developed to solve the resulting model. Finite adaptability relies on uncertainty set partitions, and in order to avoid arbitrary choices of partitions, a novel heuristic partitioning methodology is developed based on upper-bound paths to guide the partitioning of uncertainty sets. The modeling approach and heuristic partitioning methodology are applied to analyze a realistic GEP problem using data from the Midwestern United States. The case study provides insights on the convergence rates of the proposed heuristic partitioning methodology, decision rule performances, and the value of flexibility compared with non-flexible solutions, showing that explicit considerations of flexibility through real options can yield significant cost savings and improved system performance in the face of uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Aakil M. Caunhye & Michel-Alexandre Cardin, 2017. "An approach based on robust optimization and decision rules for analyzing real options in engineering systems design," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(8), pages 753-767, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:49:y:2017:i:8:p:753-767
    DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2017.1299958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24725854.2017.1299958
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24725854.2017.1299958?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aakil M. Caunhye & Nazli Yonca Aydin & H. Sebnem Duzgun, 2020. "Robust post-disaster route restoration," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(4), pages 1055-1087, December.
    2. Kuznetsova, Elizaveta & Cardin, Michel-Alexandre & Diao, Mingzhen & Zhang, Sizhe, 2019. "Integrated decision-support methodology for combined centralized-decentralized waste-to-energy management systems design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 477-500.
    3. Sixiang Zhao, 2023. "Decision rule-based method in solving adjustable robust capacity expansion problem," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 97(2), pages 259-286, April.
    4. Caunhye, Aakil M. & Cardin, Michel-Alexandre, 2018. "Towards more resilient integrated power grid capacity expansion: A robust optimization approach with operational flexibility," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 20-34.
    5. Abdin, Islam F. & Zio, Enrico, 2018. "An integrated framework for operational flexibility assessment in multi-period power system planning with renewable energy production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 898-914.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:49:y:2017:i:8:p:753-767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.