IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transp/v45y2022i1p39-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Users and non-users of bikesharing: how do they differ?

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Soltani
  • Andrew Allan
  • Dorina Pojani
  • Fahimeh Khalaj
  • Milad Mehdizadeh

Abstract

What makes some people eschew bikesharing? What distinguishes users from non-users? The present study examines the transport priorities and socio-demographic characteristics of both users and non-users of bikesharing in the context of Adelaide, an Australian metropolis of 1.3 million people. We apply statistical techniques, including Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and two-level Nested Logit (NL) modelling, to original survey data collected in 2018. We find that younger age, digital literacy, full-time work status, household size, and certain transport priority dimensions which we term Safekeeping, Ease, and Fitness, are key factors associated with the likelihood of choosing or shunning bikesharing as a mode of transport.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Soltani & Andrew Allan & Dorina Pojani & Fahimeh Khalaj & Milad Mehdizadeh, 2022. "Users and non-users of bikesharing: how do they differ?," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 39-58, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:45:y:2022:i:1:p:39-58
    DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2021.2017215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03081060.2021.2017215
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03081060.2021.2017215?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Soltani, Ali & Roohani Qadikolaei, Mohsen, 2024. "Space-time analysis of accident frequency and the role of built environment in mitigation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 189-205.
    2. Bo Cao & Abdol Aziz Shahraki, 2023. "Planning of Transportation Infrastructure Networks for Sustainable Development with Case Studies in Chabahar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Ali Soltani & Andrew Allan & Masoud Javadpoor & Jaswanth Lella, 2022. "Space Syntax in Analysing Bicycle Commuting Routes in Inner Metropolitan Adelaide," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:45:y:2022:i:1:p:39-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GTPT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.