IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v57y2019i15-16p4805-4827.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disassembly line balancing problem: a review of the state of the art and future directions

Author

Listed:
  • Eren Özceylan
  • Can B. Kalayci
  • Aşkıner Güngör
  • Surendra M. Gupta

Abstract

The disassembly line balancing (DLB) problem assigns the set of tasks to each workstation for each product to be disassembled and aims at attaining several objectives, such as minimising the number of workstations, ensuring similar idle time at each workstation and removing hazardous parts/highly demanded components at the earliest moments possible. Over the past two decades, the DLB problem and its variants have grown ever more popular for researchers and practitioners of environmentally conscious manufacturing. Yet, the problem characteristics and assumptions vary widely and there is no literature review to classify the existing articles accordingly. Hence, a comprehensive literature review of recent and state-of-the-art papers is vital to draw a framework of the past, and to shed light on future directions. To do so, 116 studies published in proceedings and journals since 1999 are selected and reviewed. The papers are then analysed and categorised to construct a useful foundation of past research. Finally, trends and gaps in the literature are identified to clarify and to suggest future research opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Eren Özceylan & Can B. Kalayci & Aşkıner Güngör & Surendra M. Gupta, 2019. "Disassembly line balancing problem: a review of the state of the art and future directions," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(15-16), pages 4805-4827, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:57:y:2019:i:15-16:p:4805-4827
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1428775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2018.1428775
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2018.1428775?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Weckenborg, Christian & Schumacher, Patrick & Thies, Christian & Spengler, Thomas S., 2024. "Flexibility in manufacturing system design: A review of recent approaches from Operations Research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 413-441.
    2. Hu, Peng & Chu, Feng & Dolgui, Alexandre & Chu, Chengbin & Liu, Ming, 2024. "Integrated multi-product reverse supply chain design and disassembly line balancing under uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    3. Shafiee, Mohammad & Zare-Mehrjerdi, Yahia & Govindan, Kannan & Dastgoshade, Sohaib, 2022. "A causality analysis of risks to perishable product supply chain networks during the COVID-19 outbreak era: An extended DEMATEL method under Pythagorean fuzzy environment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    4. Peng Hu & Feng Chu & Yunfei Fang & Peng Wu, 2022. "Novel distribution-free model and method for stochastic disassembly line balancing with limited distributional information," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1423-1446, July.
    5. Ömer Faruk Yılmaz & Büşra Yazıcı, 2022. "Tactical level strategies for multi-objective disassembly line balancing problem with multi-manned stations: an optimization model and solution approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(2), pages 1793-1843, December.
    6. Wenjie Wang & Guangdong Tian & Gang Yuan & Duc Truong Pham, 2023. "Energy-time tradeoffs for remanufacturing system scheduling using an invasive weed optimization algorithm," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 1065-1083, March.
    7. Diefenbach, Johannes & Stolletz, Raik, 2022. "Stochastic assembly line balancing: General bounds and reliability-based branch-and-bound algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 589-605.
    8. Boysen, Nils & Schulze, Philipp & Scholl, Armin, 2022. "Assembly line balancing: What happened in the last fifteen years?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 797-814.
    9. Özden Tozanlı & Elif Kongar & Surendra M. Gupta, 2020. "Evaluation of Waste Electronic Product Trade-in Strategies in Predictive Twin Disassembly Systems in the Era of Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-33, July.
    10. Jianhua Cao & Xuhui Xia & Lei Wang & Zelin Zhang & Xiang Liu, 2019. "A Novel Multi-Efficiency Optimization Method for Disassembly Line Balancing Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2022. "Hybridizations in line balancing problems: A comprehensive review on new trends and formulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    12. Junkai He & Feng Chu & Feifeng Zheng & Ming Liu, 2021. "A green-oriented bi-objective disassembly line balancing problem with stochastic task processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 71-93, January.
    13. Süleyman Mete & Faruk Serin & Zeynel Abidin Çil & Erkan Çelik & Eren Özceylan, 2023. "A comparative analysis of meta-heuristic methods on disassembly line balancing problem with stochastic time," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 321(1), pages 371-408, February.
    14. Yicong Gao & Shanhe Lou & Hao Zheng & Jianrong Tan, 2023. "A data-driven method of selective disassembly planning at end-of-life under uncertainty," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 565-585, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:57:y:2019:i:15-16:p:4805-4827. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.