IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v54y2016i10p2965-2975.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aligning workload control theory and practice: lot splitting and operation overlapping issues

Author

Listed:
  • Nuno O. Fernandes
  • Martin J. Land
  • S. Carmo-Silva

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of lot splitting in the context of workload control (WLC). Past studies on WLC assumed that jobs released to the shop floor proceed through the different stages of processing without being split. However, in practice, large jobs are often split into smaller transfer sublots so that they can move more quickly and independently through the production process and allow operations overlapping relating to the same job. This paper assesses the performance of different lot splitting policies for job release and dispatching strategies under lot splitting. A new dispatching rule was designed to specifically take advantage of lot splitting and operations overlapping in the context of WLC. Discrete-event simulation is used to assess system performance in relation to the ability to provide shorter delivery times and on time deliveries. Results highlight the importance of releasing the sublots of the same job together and demonstrate that combining an effective lot splitting policy with an appropriate dispatching rule can enhance the performance of production systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuno O. Fernandes & Martin J. Land & S. Carmo-Silva, 2016. "Aligning workload control theory and practice: lot splitting and operation overlapping issues," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(10), pages 2965-2975, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:54:y:2016:i:10:p:2965-2975
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1143134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2016.1143134
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2016.1143134?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Davide Mezzogori & Giovanni Romagnoli & Francesco Zammori, 2021. "Defining accurate delivery dates in make to order job-shops managed by workload control," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 956-991, December.
    2. Onay, Anita & Stampfer, Christina & Missbauer, Hubert, 2023. "A behavioral perspective on workload control concepts: The influence of order release on operators’ reaction behavior," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    3. Matthias Thürer & Nuno O. Fernandes & Mark Stevenson & Cristovao Silva & Silvio Carmo-Silva, 2019. "POLC-A: an assessment of POLCA’s authorization element," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(6), pages 2435-2447, August.
    4. Kaustav Kundu & Martin J. Land & Alberto Portioli-Staudacher & Jos A. C. Bokhorst, 2021. "Order review and release in make-to-order flow shops: analysis and design of new methods," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 750-782, September.
    5. Matthias Thürer & Mark Stevenson, 2021. "Material handling and order release control in high-variety make-to-order shops: an assessment by simulation," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 494-506, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:54:y:2016:i:10:p:2965-2975. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.