IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tjsmxx/v13y2019i1p55-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strengthening the reporting of empirical simulation studies: Introducing the STRESS guidelines

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Monks
  • Christine S. M. Currie
  • Bhakti Stephan Onggo
  • Stewart Robinson
  • Martin Kunc
  • Simon J. E. Taylor

Abstract

This study develops a standardised checklist approach to improve the reporting of discrete-event simulation, system dynamics and agent-based simulation models within the field of Operational Research and Management Science. Incomplete or ambiguous reporting means that many simulation studies are not reproducible, leaving other modellers with an incomplete picture of what has been done and unable to judge the reliability of the results. Crucially, unclear reporting makes it difficult to reproduce or reuse findings. In this paper, we review the evidence on the quality of model reporting and consolidate previous work. We derive general good practice principles and three 20-item checklists aimed at Strengthening The Reporting of Empirical Simulation Studies (STRESS): STRESS-DES, STRESS-ABS and STRESS-SD for discrete-event simulation, agent-based simulation and system dynamics, respectively. Given the variety of simulation projects, we provide usage and troubleshooting advice to cover a wide range of situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Monks & Christine S. M. Currie & Bhakti Stephan Onggo & Stewart Robinson & Martin Kunc & Simon J. E. Taylor, 2019. "Strengthening the reporting of empirical simulation studies: Introducing the STRESS guidelines," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 55-67, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:55-67
    DOI: 10.1080/17477778.2018.1442155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17477778.2018.1442155
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17477778.2018.1442155?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nieqing Cao & Austin Marcus & Lubna Altarawneh & Soongeol Kwon, 2023. "Priority-based replenishment policy for robotic dispensing in central fill pharmacy systems: a simulation-based study," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 344-362, June.
    2. Nguyen, Le Khanh Ngan & Howick, Susan & Megiddo, Itamar, 2024. "A framework for conceptualising hybrid system dynamics and agent-based simulation models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1153-1166.
    3. Monks, Thomas & Harper, Alison & Anagnostou, Anastasia & Taylor, Simon J.E., 2022. "Open Science for Computer Simulation," OSF Preprints zpxtm, Center for Open Science.
    4. Maren S. Barth & Katharina Palm & Henrik Andersson & Tobias A. Granberg & Anders N. Gullhav & Andreas Krüger, 2024. "Emergency exit layout planning using optimization and agent-based simulation," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-25, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tjsmxx:v:13:y:2019:i:1:p:55-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tjsm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.