IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v10y2010i6p622-637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global regime and national change

Author

Listed:
  • XINYUAN DAI

Abstract

This article sheds light on the design of the global climate change regime by drawing lessons from the literature produced by international cooperation, international institutions and other international regimes in diverse issue areas. It is argued that sound policy implications for the design of a global climate change regime require a solid understanding of how (in what ways and under what conditions) international instruments influence national governments and domestic policies. While scholars and policy-makers alike often look towards strong and powerful international institutions such as the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, and the World Trade Organization for design inspiration, the majority of international institutions are those that in fact lack enforcement power. Despite these shortcomings, many of these international institutions often influence national policies in a variety of indirect but effective ways. At the heart of these indirect mechanisms is the mobilization of domestic action. Utilizing and further empowering stakeholders (decentralized and spreading over various levels) is thus the key. The indirect channels of institutional influence are particularly relevant to climate change and provide policy implications for the design of the global climate change regime.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyuan Dai, 2010. "Global regime and national change," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(6), pages 622-637, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:10:y:2010:i:6:p:622-637
    DOI: 10.3763/cpol.2010.0146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.3763/cpol.2010.0146
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3763/cpol.2010.0146?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Risse, 1999. "International Norms and Domestic Change: Arguing and Communicative Behavior in the Human Rights Area," Politics & Society, , vol. 27(4), pages 529-559, December.
    2. Carlo Carraro & Christian Egenhofer (ed.), 2007. "Climate and Trade Policy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12693.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fergus Green, 2018. "Anti-fossil fuel norms," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 103-116, September.
    2. Aviel Verbruggen, 2011. "A Turbo Drive for the Global Reduction of Energy-Related CO 2 Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Alexandra E. Cirone & Johannes Urpelainen, 2013. "Trade sanctions in international environmental policy: Deterring or encouraging free riding?," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 30(4), pages 309-334, September.
    4. Katarina Buhr & Susanna Roth & Peter Stigson, 2014. "Climate Change Politics through a Global Pledge-and-Review Regime: Positions among Negotiators and Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard Stewart & Michael Oppenheimer & Bryce Rudyk, 2013. "A new strategy for global climate protection," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 120(1), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Pistorius, Till & Reinecke, Sabine, 2013. "The interim REDD+ Partnership: Boost for biodiversity safeguards?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 80-86.
    3. Stephen, Matthew D., 2015. "‘Can you pass the salt?’ The legitimacy of international institutions and indirect speech," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 21(4), pages 768-792.
    4. Christoph Engel & Michael Kurschilgen, 2011. "The Coevolution of Behavior and Normative Expectations. Customary Law in the Lab," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2011_32, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    5. Anne van Aaken & Janis Antonovics & Anne Aaken, 2016. "Is International Law Conducive To Preventing Looming Disasters?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7, pages 81-96, May.
    6. Eberwein, Wolf-Dieter, 2004. "Humanitäre Hilfe - Krieg und Terror: Kontinuität und Wandel eines Politikfeldes," Discussion Papers, Research Group International Politics P 04-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    7. Marschinski, Robert & Flachsland, Christian & Jakob, Michael, 2012. "Sectoral linking of carbon markets: A trade-theory analysis," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 585-606.
    8. Carlo Carraro, 2014. "International environmental cooperation," Chapters, in: Giles Atkinson & Simon Dietz & Eric Neumayer & Matthew Agarwala (ed.), Handbook of Sustainable Development, chapter 26, pages 418-431, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Thomas Kuhn & Radomir Pestow & Anja Zenker, 2019. "Building Climate Coalitions on Preferential Free Trade Agreements," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(2), pages 539-569, October.
    10. Juliane Reinecke & Shaz Ansari, 2016. "Taming Wicked Problems: The Role of Framing in the Construction of Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 299-329, May.
    11. Christoph Engel, 2010. "An Experimental Contribution to the Theory of Customary (International) Law," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2010_13, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    12. Huang, Wei Ming & Lee, Grace W.M., 2009. "Feasibility analysis of GHG reduction target: Lessons from Taiwan's energy policy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2621-2628, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:10:y:2010:i:6:p:622-637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.