IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/servic/v30y2008i5p731-748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The tendency of advanced services to co-locate and the implications for regional government policy

Author

Listed:
  • C. Michael Wernerheim

Abstract

If services have a tendency to agglomerate in some places and not in others, does it make sense to attempt to divert them to areas where agglomeration benefits are weak or not present at all? Using a new spatial data set for Canada applied to a stochastic location model [Ellison, G., & Glaeser, E.L. (1997). Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach. Journal of Political Economy , 105 , 889--927], we find that services co-locate with other services and with other industries across space. Agglomeration economies are pronounced, and general rather than industry specific. Services appear no less prone to co-agglomeration than manufacturing industries. The implications for government policy incentives are mixed, suggesting caution.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Michael Wernerheim, 2008. "The tendency of advanced services to co-locate and the implications for regional government policy," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 731-748, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:30:y:2008:i:5:p:731-748
    DOI: 10.1080/02642060802253900
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02642060802253900
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02642060802253900?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barak S. Aharonson & Joel A.C. Baum & Maryann P. Feldman, 2004. "Industrial Clustering and the Returns to Inventive Activity Canadian Biotechnology Firms, 1991-2000," DRUID Working Papers 04-03, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    2. Michael S. Dahl & Christian Ø.R. Pedersen, 2003. "Knowledge Flows through Informal Contacts in Industrial Clusters Myths or Realities?," DRUID Working Papers 03-01, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Blanca de-Miguel-Molina & Jose-Luis Hervas-Oliver & Rafael Boix & Maria De-Miguel-Molina, 2011. "The Importance of Creative Industry Agglomerations in Explaining the Wealth of European Regions," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(8), pages 1263-1280, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julien Pénin, 2005. "Three Consequences of Considering Innovation as a Collective Process and Knowledge as a Collective Good," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(01), pages 15-27.
    2. Ron Boschma & Riccardo Cappelli & Anet Weterings, 2017. "Labour mobility, skill-relatedness and plant survival over the industry life cycle: Evidence from new Dutch plants," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1731, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Dec 2017.
    3. Antoine Bureth & Julien Pénin & Sandrine Wolff, 2010. "Start-Up Creation In Biotechnology: Lessons From The Case Of Four New Ventures In The Upper Rhine Biovalley," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(02), pages 253-283.
    4. Popescul, Daniela, 2011. "The confidentiality – integrity – accessibility triad into the knowledge security: a reassessment from the point of view of the knowledge contribution to innovation," MPRA Paper 51747, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Brinkhoff, Sascha & Suwala, Lech & Kulke, Elmar, 2015. "Managing Innovation in ‘Localities of Learning’ in Berlin and Seville," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 1-31.
    6. Rudiger Wink, 2010. "Transregional Institutional Learning in Europe: Prerequisites, Actors and Limitations," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 499-511.
    7. Emilie-Pauline Gallie, 2009. "Is Geographical Proximity Necessary for Knowledge Spillovers within a Cooperative Technological Network? The Case of the French Biotechnology Sector," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 33-42.
    8. Emilie-Pauline Gallie & Diego Legros, 2007. "How Do Spatial Spillovers Diffuse In Science-Industry Interactions? The Case Of French Biotech Sector," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(8), pages 635-652.
    9. Li Fang, 2019. "Manufacturing Clusters and Firm Innovation," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 33(1), pages 6-18, February.
    10. Li Fang, 2020. "Agglomeration and innovation: Selection or true effect?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(2), pages 423-448, March.
    11. Anders Malmberg & Dominic Power, 2005. "(How) Do (Firms in) Clusters Create Knowledge?," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 409-431.
    12. Thomas Brenner & André Mühlig, 2007. "Factors and Mechanisms Causing the Emergence of Local Industrial Clusters - A Meta-Study of 159 Cases," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2007-23, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    13. Feldman, Maryann & Martin, Roger, 2005. "Constructing jurisdictional advantage," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1235-1249, October.
    14. Alessandro Malipiero & Federico Munari & Maurizio Sobrero, 2005. "Focal Firms as Technological Gatakeepers within Industrial Districts Knowledge Creation and Dissemination in the Italian Packaging Machinery Industry," DRUID Working Papers 05-05, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    15. Rik Wenting & Oedzge Atzema & Koen Frenken, 2008. "Urban Amenities or Agglomeration Economies? Locational Behaviour and Entrepreneurial Success of Dutch Fashion Designers," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 0803, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jan 2008.
    16. Balázs Lengyel & Rikard H. Eriksson, 2017. "Co-worker networks, labour mobility and productivity growth in regions," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(3), pages 635-660.
    17. Barak S. Aharonson & Suleika Bort & Michael Woywode, 2020. "The Influence of Multinational Corporations on International Alliance Formation Behavior of Colocated Start-Ups," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 770-795, May.
    18. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Eriksson, Rikard, 2017. "Job-related Mobility and Plant Performance in Sweden," CEPR Discussion Papers 12018, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Li Fang, 2018. "The Dual Effects of Information Technology Clusters: Learning and Selection," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 32(3), pages 195-209, August.
    20. Bekkers, R. & Gilsing, V.A. & van der Steen, M., 2006. "Determining factors of the effectiveness of IP-based spin-offs : Comparing the Netherlands and the US," Other publications TiSEM 3e40ba18-c59c-46b5-a16a-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:30:y:2008:i:5:p:731-748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FSIJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.