IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/servic/v24y2004i6p19-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does perception matter?: an empirical analysis of donor behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Adrian Sargeant
  • Douglas C. West
  • John B. Ford

Abstract

This article provides the first empirically based marketing model of the perceptions of givers and the resulting impact on donations. Within nonprofit marketing there is a considerable amount of extant research to support the view that both extrinsic and intrinsic variables can be used to separate givers and non-givers to charities. However, they are less useful in explaining how individuals select between the charitable alternatives and in understanding how people determine and apportion support. Perceptual factors offer more utility in this regard. Structural equations models are presented based on a survey of over 2,300 active and lapsed donors that link a series of perceptual determinants to four relevant charity performance measures: the total amount given to charity, the number of gifts given, the giving lifetime between the individual and the charity, and the amount given yearly. Marketing management implications are identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrian Sargeant & Douglas C. West & John B. Ford, 2004. "Does perception matter?: an empirical analysis of donor behaviour," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 19-36, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:24:y:2004:i:6:p:19-36
    DOI: 10.1080/0264206042000299167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0264206042000299167
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0264206042000299167?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Drevs, Florian & Gebele, Christoph & Tscheulin, Dieter K., 2014. "The patient perspective of clinical training—An empirical study about patient motives to participate," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 74-83.
    2. Claudia Townsend & Darren DahlEditor & Page MoreauAssociate Editor, 2017. "The Price of Beauty: Differential Effects of Design Elements with and without Cost Implications in Nonprofit Donor Solicitations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(4), pages 794-815.
    3. Noussair, Charles & Habetinova, Lenka, 2015. "Charitable Giving, Emotions, and the Default Effect," Other publications TiSEM 76d93ea1-ef4a-4fc6-b6ef-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Lenka Fiala & Charles N. Noussair, 2017. "Charitable Giving, Emotions, And The Default Effect," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(4), pages 1792-1812, October.
    5. Tripathi, Sanjeev & Agrawal, Kopal, 2015. "A Study on the Not-for-Profit Route to Olympic Gold," IIMA Working Papers WP2015-03-03, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    6. Adam Saifer, 2021. "Philanthropic Nation Branding, Ideology, and Accumulation: Insights from the Canadian Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 559-576, October.
    7. Lucía Melián-Alzola & Josefa D. Martín-Santana, 2020. "Service quality in blood donation: satisfaction, trust and loyalty," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 14(1), pages 101-129, March.
    8. Christian Schultz & Sabine Einwiller & Jens Seiffert-Brockmann & Wolfgang Weitzl, 2019. "When Reputation Influences Trust in Nonprofit Organizations. The Role of Value Attachment as Moderator," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 159-170, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:24:y:2004:i:6:p:19-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FSIJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.