IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocxx/v10y2015i1p1-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contextualising the self in contemporary social science

Author

Listed:
  • Charalambos Tsekeris

Abstract

This special issue of Contemporary Social Science provides a variety of perspectives on current thinking on the nature of the self within a sociocultural context. These viewpoints show the self to be, paradoxically, both autonomous and interdependent. It is reflexively open, socially embedded and interactively created. This leads to the proposal that the self is a relational not a metaphysical or essential entity. The present paper, therefore, summarises various developments in current social science thought which explore the dynamic, relational and nonlinear understanding of the self. These mainly involve the consideration of the complex links between agents and structures. The critical interrogation of these links, starting from an agent-based systems perspective, highlights the contextual and dialectic emergence of the self in contemporary society. This provides a fresh interdisciplinary framework for understanding the complex dynamics of both the self and society which has practical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Charalambos Tsekeris, 2015. "Contextualising the self in contemporary social science," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:10:y:2015:i:1:p:1-14
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2015.1010340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21582041.2015.1010340
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21582041.2015.1010340?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John H. Miller & Scott E. Page, 2007. "Social Science in Between, from Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life," Introductory Chapters, in: Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life, Princeton University Press.
    2. John H. Miller & Scott E. Page, 2007. "Complexity in Social Worlds, from Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life," Introductory Chapters, in: Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life, Princeton University Press.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tsekeris, Charalambos & Kaberis, Nikos & Pinguli, Maria, 2015. "The self in crisis: the experience of personal and social suffering in contemporary Greece," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 62362, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Charalambos Tsekeris & Nikos Kaberis & Maria Pinguli, 2015. "Growth, Debt and Sovereignty: The Self in Crisis: The Experience of Personal and Social Suffering in Contemporary Greece," GreeSE – Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe 92, Hellenic Observatory, LSE.
    3. Toby Newstead & Sarah Dawkins & Rob Macklin & Angela Martin, 2020. "The Virtues Project: An Approach to Developing Good Leaders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(4), pages 605-622, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Citera, Emanuele & Sau, Lino, 2019. "Complexity, Conventions and Instability: the role of monetary policy," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201924, University of Turin.
    2. Theodosio, Bruno Miller & Weber, Jan, 2023. "Back to the classics: R-evolution towards statistical equilibria," ifso working paper series 28, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Socioeconomics (ifso).
    3. Jeffery S. McMullen & Dimo Dimov, 2013. "Time and the Entrepreneurial Journey: The Problems and Promise of Studying Entrepreneurship as a Process," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(8), pages 1481-1512, December.
    4. Gräbner, Claudius, 2016. "From realism to instrumentalism - and back? Methodological implications of changes in the epistemology of economics," MPRA Paper 71933, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Niceto S. Poblador, 2011. "The Strategy Dilemma : Why Big Business Moves Seldom Pan Out as Planned," UP School of Economics Discussion Papers 201105, University of the Philippines School of Economics.
    6. Flaminio Squazzoni, 2010. "The impact of agent-based models in the social sciences after 15 years of incursions," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 18(2), pages 197-234.
    7. Fuat Oğuz, 2020. "Hayekian complexity and the role of regulation in electricity markets," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 406-418, October.
    8. Mykola Odrekhivskyi & Orysya Pshyk-Kovalska & Volodymyr Zhezhukha & Iryna Ivanochko, 2022. "Intelligent Management of Enterprise Business Processes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Salter, Alexander William & Tarko, Vlad, 2017. "Polycentric banking and macroeconomic stability," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 365-395, June.
    10. Chandra, Yanto & Wilkinson, Ian F., 2017. "Firm internationalization from a network-centric complex-systems perspective," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 691-701.
    11. Paul Dragos Aligica & Vlad Tarko, 2014. "Institutional Resilience and Economic Systems: Lessons from Elinor Ostrom’s Work," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 56(1), pages 52-76, March.
    12. Paula Dawidowicz, 2012. "The Person on the Street's Understanding of Systems Thinking," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 2-13, January.
    13. A. J. Burns & Clay Posey & James F. Courtney & Tom L. Roberts & Prabhashi Nanayakkara, 0. "Organizational information security as a complex adaptive system: insights from three agent-based models," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    14. Skarda, Ieva & Asaria, Miqdad & Cookson, Richard, 2022. "Evaluating childhood policy impacts on lifetime health, wellbeing and inequality: Lifecourse distributional economic evaluation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    15. Ștefan Ionescu & Ionuț Nica & Nora Chiriță, 2021. "Cybernetics Approach Using Agent-Based Modeling in the Process of Evacuating Educational Institutions in Case of Disasters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-29, September.
    16. S. Gualdi & M. Medo & Y.-C. Zhang, 2011. "Self-organized model of cascade spreading," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 79(1), pages 91-98, January.
    17. Flávia F Feitosa & Quang Bao Le & Paul L G Vlek & Antônio Miguel V Monteiro & Roberta Rosemback, 2012. "Countering Urban Segregation in Brazilian Cities: Policy-Oriented Explorations Using Agent-Based Simulation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 39(6), pages 1131-1150, December.
    18. James Hollway & Jean-Frédéric Morin & Joost Pauwelyn, 2020. "Structural conditions for novelty: the introduction of new environmental clauses to the trade regime complex," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 61-83, March.
    19. James Nolan & Dawn Parker & G. Cornelis Van Kooten & Thomas Berger, 2009. "An Overview of Computational Modeling in Agricultural and Resource Economics," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 57(4), pages 417-429, December.
    20. David A. Broniatowski & Conrad Tucker, 2017. "Assessing causal claims about complex engineered systems with quantitative data: internal, external, and construct validity," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(6), pages 483-496, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:10:y:2015:i:1:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsoc21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.