IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjusxx/v17y2013i1p1-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bus rapid transit - a review

Author

Listed:
  • S. C. Wirasinghe
  • L. Kattan
  • M. M. Rahman
  • J. Hubbell
  • R. Thilakaratne
  • S. Anowar

Abstract

Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) has been demonstrated to provide efficient and effective public transport that can even increase transit ridership and attractiveness within defined urban corridors in both developing and developed countries. The merit of the BRT system lies in its ability to provide a high quality public transit service with limited infrastructure and at a relatively low capital and operating cost. In this paper an attempt is made to review BRT characteristics in some detail. An overview of the elements of BRT systems: the running ways, vehicles, stations, as well as operational control, fare collection and passenger information systems is presented. This paper also discusses how these elements allows BRT services to achieve the speed, capacity, reliability, accessibility and operational safety characteristics that distinguishes such systems from regular express bus services. Each built BRT system is unique and depends on how these basic elements are designed and integrated. Environmental, social and economic impacts, users' perception and modal shift towards BRT have also been critically reviewed. With the presence of local land use and transport policies that support high-density and mixed developments, BRT has been found to attract potential developments around stations and along its corridor, increasing land values and promoting sustainable development. As reported in the literature, the infrastructure costs vary greatly depending on the costs of land acquisition, station design, degree of separation from traffic, technological features and material, labor costs. Thus, BRT capital costs cannot be generalized and must be transferred carefully based on the changes of the input costs that vary from one place to another. The barriers to BRT that block the achievement of significant success in customer satisfaction and ridership gains are mentioned with specific case studies. The review of BRT indicates that in some cases it has similar performance to higher order public transit; however, it still has its unique characteristics that set it apart.

Suggested Citation

  • S. C. Wirasinghe & L. Kattan & M. M. Rahman & J. Hubbell & R. Thilakaratne & S. Anowar, 2013. "Bus rapid transit - a review," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 1-31, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjusxx:v:17:y:2013:i:1:p:1-31
    DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2013.777514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12265934.2013.777514
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/12265934.2013.777514?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rabinovitch, Jonas & Hoehn, John P., 1995. "A Sustainable Urban Transportation System: The "Surface Metro" In Curitiba, Brazil," Working Papers 11886, Environmental and Natural Resources Policy Training Project.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Singh, Harpreet & Kathuria, Ankit, 2023. "Heterogeneity in passenger satisfaction of bus rapid transit system among age and gender groups: A PLS-SEM Multi-group analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 27-41.
    2. Filippova, Olga & Sheng, Mingyue, 2020. "Impact of bus rapid transit on residential property prices in Auckland, New Zealand," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    3. Proboste, Francisco & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Gschwender, Antonio, 2020. "Comparing social costs of public transport networks structured around an Open and Closed BRT corridor in medium sized cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 187-212.
    4. Acton, Blake & Le, Huyen T.K. & Miller, Harvey J., 2022. "Impacts of bus rapid transit (BRT) on residential property values: A comparative analysis of 11 US BRT systems," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    5. Wu, Irene & Pojani, Dorina, 2016. "Obstacles to the creation of successful bus rapid transit systems: The case of Bangkok," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 44-53.
    6. Asgarian, Fariba & Hejazi, Seyed Reza & Khosroshahi, Hossein & Safarzadeh, Soroush, 2024. "Vehicle pricing considering EVs promotion and public transportation investment under governmental policies on sustainable transportation development: The case of Norway," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 204-221.
    7. Levine, Jonathan & Singer, Matan & Merlin, Louis & Grengs, Joe, 2018. "Apples to apples: Comparing BRT and light rail while avoiding the “BRT-Lite” trap," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 20-34.
    8. Gibson, Jaime & Munizaga, Marcela A. & Schneider, Camila & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2016. "Estimating the bus user time benefits of implementing a median busway: Methodology and case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 72-82.
    9. Olesen, Mette & Lassen, Claus, 2016. "Rationalities and materialities of light rail scapes," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 373-382.
    10. Márquez, Luis & Pico, Ricardo & Cantillo, Víctor, 2018. "Understanding captive user behavior in the competition between BRT and motorcycle taxis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1-9.
    11. R. S. Thilakaratne & S. C. Wirasinghe, 2016. "Implementation of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) on an optimal segment of a long regular bus route," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 15-29, March.
    12. Ela Babalik-Sutcliffe & Elif Can Cengiz, 2015. "Bus Rapid Transit System in Istanbul: A Success Story or Flawed Planning Decision?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 792-813, November.
    13. Donghyung Yook & Kevin Heaslip, 2015. "The effect of crowding on public transit user travel behavior in a large-scale public transportation system through modeling daily variations," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(8), pages 935-953, December.
    14. Sung, Hyungun & Choi, Keechoo & Lee, Sugie & Cheon, SangHyun, 2014. "Exploring the impacts of land use by service coverage and station-level accessibility on rail transit ridership," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 134-140.
    15. Mohammad Hadi Almasi & Ali Sadollah & Seungmo Kang & Mohamed Rehan Karim, 2016. "Optimization of an Improved Intermodal Transit Model Equipped with Feeder Bus and Railway Systems Using Metaheuristics Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-27, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manisha Verma & Anurag Priyadarshee, 2015. "Improving Service Delivery through State–Citizen Partnership: The Case of the Ahmedabad Urban Transport System," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 321-336, June.
    2. Taotao Deng & John D. Nelson, 2010. "Recent Developments in Bus Rapid Transit: A Review of the Literature," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 69-96, May.
    3. Deborah L. Bleviss, 2022. "The legacy of Jaime Lerner and Curitiba, Brazil," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(5), September.
    4. Jeroen Klink & Rosana Denaldi, 2012. "Metropolitan Fragmentation and Neo-localism in the Periphery," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(3), pages 543-561, February.
    5. Zhou, Jiangping, 2016. "The transit metropolis of Chinese characteristics? Literature review, interviews, surveys and case studies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 115-125.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjusxx:v:17:y:2013:i:1:p:1-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjus20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.