IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgfmxx/v9y2018i4p364-378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fashion brand green demarketing: Effects on customer attitudes and behavior intentions

Author

Listed:
  • Shina Kim
  • Eunju Ko
  • Sang Jin Kim

Abstract

The authors focus on a fashion brand, Patagonia, to study green demarketing advertising in the fashion industry, a strategy for enhancing sustainability by encouraging consumers to avoid buying unneeded products. The study shows that green demarketing advertising positively affects consumer attitudes and behavior intentions in consumers who have either analytic or intuitive cognitive styles. All cognitive styles react most positively to concrete rather than abstract demarketing advertisements. Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Shina Kim & Eunju Ko & Sang Jin Kim, 2018. "Fashion brand green demarketing: Effects on customer attitudes and behavior intentions," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 364-378, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:9:y:2018:i:4:p:364-378
    DOI: 10.1080/20932685.2018.1503557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20932685.2018.1503557
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20932685.2018.1503557?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Halicki & Piotr Zaborek & Grégoire Meylan, 2024. "Sustainable Fashion Choices: Exploring European Consumer Motivations behind Second-Hand Clothing Purchases," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:9:y:2018:i:4:p:364-378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgfm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.