IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v40y2006i8p847-860.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geography of Domestic Mergers and Acquisitions (M&As): Evidence from Matched Firm-level Data

Author

Listed:
  • Petri Bockerman
  • Eero Lehto

Abstract

Bockerman P. and Lehto E. (2006) Geography of domestic mergers and acquisitions (M&As): evidence from matched firm-level data, Regional Studies 40, 847-860. This paper explores domestic mergers and acquisitions (M&As) from the regional perspective. The Finnish evidence reveals that geographical closeness is a characteristic of great importance for domestic M&As. Thus, a great number of M&As occur within narrowly defined regions. Interestingly, domestic M&As reinforce the core-periphery dimension. The results from the matched firm-level data show that larger companies can overcome geographical boundaries more easily and domestic M&As are more likely to occur in regions that contain a great number of companies. In addition, the results reveal that a strong ability by an acquiring company to monitor the target (measured by the knowledge embodied in human capital or in research and development stock) can support M&As that occur across distant locations. Bockerman P. et Lehto E. (2006) La geographie des F&A nationales; des preuves provenant des donnees aupres des entreprises a niveaux correspondants, Regional Studies 40, -. Cet article cherche a examiner sur le plan regional les fusions et acquisitions (F&A) nationales. Les preuves finlandaises laissent voir que la proximite geographique est une caracteristique non-negligeable pour ce qui est des F&A nationales. Par la suite, nombreuses sont les F&A qui ont lieu au sein des regions rigoureusement delimitees. Il est a noter que les F&A nationales renforcent la notion de centre-peripherie. Les resultats provenant des donnees aupres des entreprises a niveaux correspondants montrent que les plus grandes entreprises peuvent surmonter plus facilement les frontieres geographiques et qu'il est plus probable que les F&A nationales ont lieu dans les regions ou le parc d'entreprises s'avere important. En plus, les resultats laissent voir que la capacite d'un acquereur de surveiller l'entreprise ciblee (mesure en termes de la connaissance incarnee dans le stock de capital humain ou de R & D) peut soutenir les F&A qui ont lieu a travers des pays lointains. Fusions Acquisitions F&A Surveiller Agglomeration Bockerman P. und Lehto E. (2006) Die Geographie der im Inland durchgefuhrten Fusionen und Ubernahmen: Beweise von Daten gleichwertiger Firmen, Regional Studies 40, -. Dieser Aufsatz untersucht im Inland durchgefuhrte Fusionen und Ubernahmen (mergers and acquisitions = M&A) aus regionaler Sicht. Die finnischen Beweise zeigen, dass geographische Nahe von grosster Wichtigkeit fur im Inland durchgefuhrte M&As ist. So finden eine hohe Anzahl M&As innerhalb genau umschriebener Regionen statt. Iinteressanterweise bestarken im Inland vorgenommene Fusionen und Ubernahmen die Dimension vom Kern zur Peripherie. Die Ergebnisse der Daten auf Firmenebene zeigen, dass es grosseren Gesellschaften eher gelingt, geographische Grenzen zu uberwinden, und dass M&As innerhalb eines Landes eher in Regionen stattfinden, in denen eine grosse Anzahl Firmen ansassig ist. Daruber hinaus zeigen die Ergebnisse, dass eine uberzeugende Fahigkeit der Ubernehmergesellschaft, das Ziel zu uberwachen (gemessen an den Kenntnissen, die in Menschenkapital oder in Forschungs- und Entwicklungskapital verkorpert sind), im Stande ist, Fusionen und Ubernahmen uber weite Entfernungen hinweg zu unterstutzen. Fusionen Ubernahmen M&As Uberwachung Ballung Bockerman P. y Lehto E. (2006) Geografia de las FyA nacionales: el ejemplo de datos comparativos entre empresas, Regional Studies 40, -. En este articulo se analizan las fusiones y adquisiciones (FyA) nacionales a partir de una perspectiva regional. El caso de Finlandia demuestra que la proximidad geografica es una caracteristica de vital importancia para las FyA nacionales. Un gran numero de FyA ocurren en regiones bien definidas de extension limitada. Es interesante observar que las FyA nacionales refuerzan la dimension entre periferica y centro. Los resultados de los datos comparativos de las empresas indican que las companias mas grandes son mas capaces de superar las limitaciones geograficas y es mas probable que las FyA nacionales ocurran en las regiones donde hay un alto numero de empresas. Ademas, los resultados indican que si las empresas compradoras tienen la capacidad de controlar el objetivo (medida por el conocimiento personificado en capital humano o en existencias de I + D) podran dar su apoyo a las FyA que ocurren en lugares mas alejados. Fusiones Adquisiciones FyA Control Aglomeracion

Suggested Citation

  • Petri Bockerman & Eero Lehto, 2006. "Geography of Domestic Mergers and Acquisitions (M&As): Evidence from Matched Firm-level Data," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(8), pages 847-860.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:8:p:847-860
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400601043365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343400601043365
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00343400601043365?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lydia Greunz, 2003. "Geographically and technologically mediated knowledge spillovers between European regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 37(4), pages 657-680, December.
    2. Gordon, Roger H & Bovenberg, A Lans, 1996. "Why Is Capital So Immobile Internationally? Possible Explanations and Implications for Capital Income Taxation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(5), pages 1057-1075, December.
    3. James R. Markusen, 2004. "Multinational Firms and the Theory of International Trade," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262633078, April.
    4. Farrell, Joseph & Shapiro, Carl, 1990. "Horizontal Mergers: An Equilibrium Analysis," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(1), pages 107-126, March.
    5. Stephen W. Salant & Sheldon Switzer & Robert J. Reynolds, 1983. "Losses From Horizontal Merger: The Effects of an Exogenous Change in Industry Structure on Cournot-Nash Equilibrium," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 98(2), pages 185-199.
    6. Wolfgang Keller, 2004. "International Technology Diffusion," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 42(3), pages 752-782, September.
    7. Perry, Martin K & Porter, Robert H, 1985. "Oligopoly and the Incentive for Horizontal Merger," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(1), pages 219-227, March.
    8. Noriaki Matsushima, 2001. "Horizontal Mergers and Merger Waves in a Location Model," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 263-286, September.
    9. Ellison, Glenn & Glaeser, Edward L, 1997. "Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 105(5), pages 889-927, October.
    10. Macho-Stadler, Ines & Perez-Castrillo, J. David, 2001. "An Introduction to the Economics of Information: Incentives and Contracts," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199243273.
    11. Eric von Hippel, 1994. ""Sticky Information" and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 429-439, April.
    12. Levy, David T & Reitzes, James D, 1992. "Anticompetitive Effects of Mergers in Markets with Localized Competition," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 427-440, April.
    13. John DiNardo & Justin L. Tobias, 2001. "Nonparametric Density and Regression Estimation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(4), pages 11-28, Fall.
    14. Ashcroft, Brian & Coppins, Barbara & Raeside, Robert, 1994. "The Regional Dimension of Takeover Activity in the United Kingdom," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 41(2), pages 163-175, May.
    15. Mark Grinblatt & Matti Keloharju, 2001. "How Distance, Language, and Culture Influence Stockholdings and Trades," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 56(3), pages 1053-1073, June.
    16. repec:bla:scandj:v:104:y:2002:i:4:p:531-45 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Kevin Morgan, 2004. "The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 3-21, January.
    18. Jensen, Michael C, 1988. "Takeovers: Their Causes and Consequences," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 2(1), pages 21-48, Winter.
    19. repec:bla:scandj:v:95:y:1993:i:1:p:97-109 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Per Botolf Maurseth & Bart Verspagen, 2002. "Knowledge Spillovers in Europe: A Patent Citations Analysis," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 104(4), pages 531-545, December.
    21. repec:bla:ausecp:v:40:y:2001:i:3:p:263-86 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin, Zhi & Yang, Yinan & Zhang, Liguang, 2021. "Geographic proximity and cross-region merger and acquisitions: Evidence from the opening of high-speed rail in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Ron Boschma & Emanuela Marrocu & Raffaele Paci, 2016. "Symmetric and asymmetric effects of proximities. The case of M&A deals in Italy," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 505-535.
    3. Viktor Kvĕtoň & Aleš Bĕlohradský & Jiří Blažek, 2020. "The variegated role of proximities in acquisitions by domestic and international companies in different phases of economic cycles," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(3), pages 583-602, June.
    4. Sidney C. Turner, 2014. "Public Sector Agglomeration in Developed Countries: The Role of Oversight," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 191-210, June.
    5. Wang, Zhe & Jiang, Dianchun & Zhang, Ming, 2024. "Seeking new location advantages: Analysis of emerging digital cross-border M&As—Based on TIMG index," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(2).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petri Böckerman & Eero Lehto, 2004. "Does geography play a role in takeovers? Theory and Finnish micro-level evidence," ERSA conference papers ersa04p15, European Regional Science Association.
    2. Petri Böckerman & Eero Lehto, 2005. "Does Geography Play a Role in Domestic Takeovers? Theory and Finnish Micro-level Evidence," Urban/Regional 0505003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Cosnita-Langlais, Andreea, 2012. "Horizontal market concentration: Theoretical insights from spatial models," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 22-32.
    4. Kjell Erik Lommerud & Odd Rune Straume & Lars Sørgard, 2006. "National versus international mergers in unionized oligopoly," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 37(1), pages 212-233, March.
    5. McCarthy, Killian J. & Aalbers, Hendrik Leendert, 2016. "Technological acquisitions: The impact of geography on post-acquisition innovative performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1818-1832.
    6. J. Peter Neary, 2007. "Cross-Border Mergers as Instruments of Comparative Advantage," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 74(4), pages 1229-1257.
    7. Chen, Jiawei, 2009. "The effects of mergers with dynamic capacity accumulation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 92-109, January.
    8. Petri Böckerman & Eero Lehto, 2006. "Enemy of Labour? Analysing the Employment Effects of Mergers and Acquisitions," Working Papers 221, Työn ja talouden tutkimus LABORE, The Labour Institute for Economic Research LABORE.
    9. Ulus Aysegul & Yildiz Halis M., 2012. "On the Relationship between Tariff Levels and the Nature of Mergers," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-40, December.
    10. Zhang, Min & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2024. "Government reform and innovation performance in China," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122728, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Fridolfsson, Sven-Olof & Stennek, Johan, 2005. "Hold-up of anti-competitive mergers," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 23(9-10), pages 753-775, December.
    12. Brito, Duarte, 2005. "Should alternative mergers or acquisitions be considered by antitrust authorities?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 23(1-2), pages 129-153, February.
    13. Pesendorfer, Martin, 2003. "Horizontal Mergers in the Paper Industry," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 34(3), pages 495-515, Autumn.
    14. Matsushima Noriaki & Sato Yasuhiro & Yamamoto Kazuhiro, 2013. "Horizontal Mergers, Firm Heterogeneity, and R&D Investments," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 959-990, August.
    15. Ziss, Steffen, 2001. "Horizontal mergers and delegation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 19(3-4), pages 471-492, March.
    16. Sergio Currarini & Marco A. Marini, 2015. "Coalitional Approaches to Collusive Agreements in Oligopoly Games," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 83(3), pages 253-287, June.
    17. Jozsef Molnar, 2002. "Preemptive Horizontal Mergers: Theory and Evidence," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 0213, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    18. Olivier Bertrand & Katariina Nilsson Hakkala & Pehr‐Johan Norbäck & Lars Persson, 2012. "Should countries block foreign takeovers of R&D champions and promote greenfield entry?," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(3), pages 1083-1124, August.
    19. Arijit Mukherjee & Umut Erksan Senalp, 2021. "Firm‐productivity and cross border merger," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 838-859, September.
    20. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2007_017 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Eric Giraud‐Héraud & Hakim Hammoudi & Mahdi Mokrane, 2003. "Multiproduct firm behaviour in a differentiated market," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 41-61, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:8:p:847-860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.